Mesa Air Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mesa Air Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Mesa Air Group Inc (MESA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.83 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($211.57 Million) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Mesa Air Group Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Mesa Air Group Inc (1991–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Mesa Air Group Inc from 1991 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Mesa Air Group Inc across 28 annual periods. Check Mesa Air Group Inc (MESA) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Mesa Air Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1991–2025)
Mesa Air Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1991 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mesa Air Group Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Mesa Air Group Inc (MESA) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | $34.24 Million | $486.62 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.07x | $34.24 Million | $486.62 Million | ▲ +304.0% |
| 2023 | -0.03x | $-24.09 Million | $698.43 Million | ▼ -308.4% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $13.36 Million | $807.43 Million | ▼ -87.9% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $132.87 Million | $968.55 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $174.66 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | $151.68 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▲ +36.5% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $118.94 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +64.6% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $74.73 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▼ -31.1% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $104.49 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▲ +94.7% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $41.67 Million | $849.55 Million | ▼ -47.8% |
| 2007 | 0.09x | $101.67 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▲ +652.6% |
| 2006 | -0.02x | $-16.58 Million | $974.00 Million | ▼ -175.7% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $22.27 Million | $991.00 Million | ▼ -52.9% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $47.33 Million | $992.63 Million | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | $54.63 Million | $357.19 Million | ▲ +1789.6% |
| 2002 | -0.01x | $-2.37 Million | $262.28 Million | ▼ -106.4% |
| 2001 | 0.14x | $45.03 Million | $320.86 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2000 | 0.14x | $33.25 Million | $240.35 Million | ▲ +33.8% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | $31.76 Million | $307.34 Million | ▲ +297.9% |
| 1998 | -0.05x | $-18.27 Million | $349.85 Million | ▼ -325.1% |
| 1997 | 0.02x | $10.97 Million | $472.78 Million | ▼ -75.5% |
| 1996 | 0.09x | $43.05 Million | $453.82 Million | ▼ -57.9% |
| 1995 | 0.23x | $42.99 Million | $190.84 Million | ▲ +13.0% |
| 1994 | 0.20x | $37.00 Million | $185.60 Million | ▼ -1.2% |
| 1993 | 0.20x | $37.10 Million | $183.90 Million | ▼ -1.9% |
| 1992 | 0.21x | $28.00 Million | $136.10 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 1991 | 0.20x | $7.10 Million | $36.20 Million | — |