MGE Energy Inc (MGEE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Latest as of March 2026:
0.04x
MGE Energy Inc (MGEE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $80.69 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.84 Billion) in one year. Explore MGEE long-term investments to assets to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
0.04x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities
Operating Cash Flow
$80.69 Million
USD
Total Liabilities
$1.84 Billion
USD
Data as of
Mar 2026
Most recent filing
MGE Energy Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for MGE Energy Inc across 62 annual periods. Also explore MGE Energy Inc (MGEE) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for MGE Energy Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for MGE Energy Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is MGE Energy Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.14x | $263.23 Million | $1.85 Billion | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | $277.78 Million | $1.60 Billion | ▲ +12.4% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $237.56 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $237.56 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▲ +44.5% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $153.74 Million | $1.44 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $153.74 Million | $1.44 Billion | ▲ +4.7% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $137.53 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $137.53 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | $172.44 Million | $1.28 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | $172.44 Million | $1.28 Billion | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | $130.47 Million | $1.23 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | $130.47 Million | $1.23 Billion | ▼ -18.5% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $153.04 Million | $1.17 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $153.04 Million | $1.17 Billion | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $132.99 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $132.99 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▼ -9.8% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $147.51 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $147.51 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $141.19 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $141.19 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | $128.76 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | $128.76 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -15.0% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | $140.27 Million | $961.55 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | $140.27 Million | $961.55 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $146.00 Million | $1.01 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $146.00 Million | $1.01 Billion | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $130.77 Million | $907.93 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $130.77 Million | $907.93 Million | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2010 | 0.16x | $124.03 Million | $792.81 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.16x | $124.03 Million | $792.81 Million | ▲ +3.5% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | $117.91 Million | $780.09 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | $117.91 Million | $780.09 Million | ▲ +59.8% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | $74.71 Million | $790.07 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | $74.71 Million | $790.07 Million | ▼ -15.6% |
| 2007 | 0.11x | $76.59 Million | $683.86 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.11x | $76.59 Million | $683.86 Million | ▼ -32.7% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $101.04 Million | $606.88 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $101.04 Million | $606.88 Million | ▲ +91.5% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $49.83 Million | $573.02 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $49.83 Million | $573.02 Million | ▼ -31.7% |
| 2004 | 0.13x | $62.31 Million | $489.17 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.13x | $62.31 Million | $489.17 Million | ▼ -14.8% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | $68.60 Million | $458.62 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | $68.60 Million | $458.62 Million | ▲ +5.9% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | $56.73 Million | $401.52 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | $56.73 Million | $401.52 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2001 | 0.23x | $74.68 Million | $325.16 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.23x | $74.68 Million | $325.16 Million | ▲ +78.5% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | $47.77 Million | $371.29 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | $47.77 Million | $371.29 Million | ▼ -33.9% |
| 1999 | 0.19x | $60.30 Million | $309.80 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.19x | $60.30 Million | $309.80 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 1998 | 0.25x | $70.50 Million | $284.00 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.25x | $70.50 Million | $284.00 Million | ▲ +77.0% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | $40.80 Million | $290.90 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | $40.80 Million | $290.90 Million | ▼ -11.4% |
| 1996 | 0.16x | $48.30 Million | $305.10 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.16x | $48.30 Million | $305.10 Million | ▼ -6.3% |
| 1995 | 0.17x | $50.80 Million | $300.80 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.17x | $50.80 Million | $300.80 Million | ▲ +20.8% |
| 1994 | 0.14x | $41.00 Million | $293.20 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.14x | $41.00 Million | $293.20 Million | — |
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.