NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-838.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($39.97 Million) in one year. See NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock across 27 annual periods. Also explore NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.73x | $-10.66 Million | $14.66 Million | ▼ -8.7% |
| 2024 | -0.67x | $-11.73 Million | $17.54 Million | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2023 | -0.58x | $-17.30 Million | $29.80 Million | ▲ +52.0% |
| 2022 | -1.21x | $-6.15 Million | $5.09 Million | ▼ -187.7% |
| 2021 | -0.42x | $-4.73 Million | $11.26 Million | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2020 | -0.36x | $-3.05 Million | $8.36 Million | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2019 | -0.70x | $-4.36 Million | $6.23 Million | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2018 | -0.76x | $-6.09 Million | $8.04 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2017 | -1.26x | $-10.67 Million | $8.46 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2016 | -1.21x | $-10.97 Million | $9.05 Million | ▲ +54.0% |
| 2015 | -2.64x | $-17.32 Million | $6.56 Million | ▼ -210.0% |
| 2014 | -0.85x | $-1.56 Million | $1.84 Million | ▼ -224.2% |
| 2013 | -0.26x | $-413.17K | $1.57 Million | ▲ +68.7% |
| 2012 | -0.84x | $-1.15 Million | $1.38 Million | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2011 | -1.76x | $-1.99 Million | $1.13 Million | ▲ +76.4% |
| 2010 | -7.45x | $-1.07 Million | $144.27K | ▼ -44.5% |
| 2009 | -5.15x | $-259.57K | $50.36K | ▼ -200.6% |
| 2008 | -1.71x | $-188.63K | $109.99K | ▲ +58.2% |
| 2007 | -4.10x | $-329.02K | $80.17K | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2006 | -3.48x | $-297.57K | $85.61K | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2005 | -3.93x | $-199.61K | $50.77K | ▲ +40.2% |
| 2004 | -6.57x | $-237.85K | $36.20K | ▼ -1405.4% |
| 2003 | -0.44x | $-32.03K | $73.39K | ▲ +41.1% |
| 2002 | -0.74x | $-22.20K | $29.98K | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2001 | -0.81x | $-26.45K | $32.68K | ▼ -2853.1% |
| 2000 | -0.03x | $-1.42K | $51.80K | ▲ +85.7% |
| 1999 | -0.19x | $-9.79K | $51.09K | — |