NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.13x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.38 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($34.57 Million) in one year. Explore NB long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock across 27 annual periods. Also explore NB total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see NB stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.73x | $-10.66 Million | $14.66 Million | ▼ -8.7% |
| 2024 | -0.67x | $-11.73 Million | $17.54 Million | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2023 | -0.58x | $-17.30 Million | $29.80 Million | ▲ +52.0% |
| 2022 | -1.21x | $-6.15 Million | $5.09 Million | ▼ -187.7% |
| 2021 | -0.42x | $-4.73 Million | $11.26 Million | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2020 | -0.36x | $-3.05 Million | $8.36 Million | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2019 | -0.70x | $-4.36 Million | $6.23 Million | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2018 | -0.76x | $-6.09 Million | $8.04 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2017 | -1.26x | $-10.67 Million | $8.46 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2016 | -1.21x | $-10.97 Million | $9.05 Million | ▲ +54.0% |
| 2015 | -2.64x | $-17.32 Million | $6.56 Million | ▼ -210.0% |
| 2014 | -0.85x | $-1.56 Million | $1.84 Million | ▼ -224.2% |
| 2013 | -0.26x | $-413.17K | $1.57 Million | ▲ +68.7% |
| 2012 | -0.84x | $-1.15 Million | $1.38 Million | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2011 | -1.76x | $-1.99 Million | $1.13 Million | ▲ +76.4% |
| 2010 | -7.45x | $-1.07 Million | $144.27K | ▼ -44.5% |
| 2009 | -5.15x | $-259.57K | $50.36K | ▼ -200.6% |
| 2008 | -1.71x | $-188.63K | $109.99K | ▲ +58.2% |
| 2007 | -4.10x | $-329.02K | $80.17K | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2006 | -3.48x | $-297.57K | $85.61K | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2005 | -3.93x | $-199.61K | $50.77K | ▲ +40.2% |
| 2004 | -6.57x | $-237.85K | $36.20K | ▼ -1405.4% |
| 2003 | -0.44x | $-32.03K | $73.39K | ▲ +41.1% |
| 2002 | -0.74x | $-22.20K | $29.98K | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2001 | -0.81x | $-26.45K | $32.68K | ▼ -2853.1% |
| 2000 | -0.03x | $-1.42K | $51.80K | ▲ +85.7% |
| 1999 | -0.19x | $-9.79K | $51.09K | — |