NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.13x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.38 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($34.57 Million) in one year. See NB FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock. Check how high is NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.73x | $-10.66 Million | $14.66 Million | ▼ -8.7% |
| 2024 | -0.67x | $-11.73 Million | $17.54 Million | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2023 | -0.58x | $-17.30 Million | $29.80 Million | ▲ +52.0% |
| 2022 | -1.21x | $-6.15 Million | $5.09 Million | ▼ -187.7% |
| 2021 | -0.42x | $-4.73 Million | $11.26 Million | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2020 | -0.36x | $-3.05 Million | $8.36 Million | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2019 | -0.70x | $-4.36 Million | $6.23 Million | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2018 | -0.76x | $-6.09 Million | $8.04 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2017 | -1.26x | $-10.67 Million | $8.46 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2016 | -1.21x | $-10.97 Million | $9.05 Million | ▲ +54.0% |
| 2015 | -2.64x | $-17.32 Million | $6.56 Million | ▼ -210.0% |
| 2014 | -0.85x | $-1.56 Million | $1.84 Million | ▼ -224.2% |
| 2013 | -0.26x | $-413.17K | $1.57 Million | ▲ +68.7% |
| 2012 | -0.84x | $-1.15 Million | $1.38 Million | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2011 | -1.76x | $-1.99 Million | $1.13 Million | ▲ +76.4% |
| 2010 | -7.45x | $-1.07 Million | $144.27K | ▼ -44.5% |
| 2009 | -5.15x | $-259.57K | $50.36K | ▼ -200.6% |
| 2008 | -1.71x | $-188.63K | $109.99K | ▲ +58.2% |
| 2007 | -4.10x | $-329.02K | $80.17K | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2006 | -3.48x | $-297.57K | $85.61K | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2005 | -3.93x | $-199.61K | $50.77K | ▲ +40.2% |
| 2004 | -6.57x | $-237.85K | $36.20K | ▼ -1405.4% |
| 2003 | -0.44x | $-32.03K | $73.39K | ▲ +41.1% |
| 2002 | -0.74x | $-22.20K | $29.98K | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2001 | -0.81x | $-26.45K | $32.68K | ▼ -2853.1% |
| 2000 | -0.03x | $-1.42K | $51.80K | ▲ +85.7% |
| 1999 | -0.19x | $-9.79K | $51.09K | — |