NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock cash flow-to-debt ratio. NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.13x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.38 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($34.57 Million) in one year. Check how high is NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (1999–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock from 1999 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock across 27 annual periods. Check NB cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2025)
NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see NB cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.73x | $-10.66 Million | $14.66 Million | ▼ -8.7% |
| 2024 | -0.67x | $-11.73 Million | $17.54 Million | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2023 | -0.58x | $-17.30 Million | $29.80 Million | ▲ +52.0% |
| 2022 | -1.21x | $-6.15 Million | $5.09 Million | ▼ -187.7% |
| 2021 | -0.42x | $-4.73 Million | $11.26 Million | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2020 | -0.36x | $-3.05 Million | $8.36 Million | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2019 | -0.70x | $-4.36 Million | $6.23 Million | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2018 | -0.76x | $-6.09 Million | $8.04 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2017 | -1.26x | $-10.67 Million | $8.46 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2016 | -1.21x | $-10.97 Million | $9.05 Million | ▲ +54.0% |
| 2015 | -2.64x | $-17.32 Million | $6.56 Million | ▼ -210.0% |
| 2014 | -0.85x | $-1.56 Million | $1.84 Million | ▼ -224.2% |
| 2013 | -0.26x | $-413.17K | $1.57 Million | ▲ +68.7% |
| 2012 | -0.84x | $-1.15 Million | $1.38 Million | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2011 | -1.76x | $-1.99 Million | $1.13 Million | ▲ +76.4% |
| 2010 | -7.45x | $-1.07 Million | $144.27K | ▼ -44.5% |
| 2009 | -5.15x | $-259.57K | $50.36K | ▼ -200.6% |
| 2008 | -1.71x | $-188.63K | $109.99K | ▲ +58.2% |
| 2007 | -4.10x | $-329.02K | $80.17K | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2006 | -3.48x | $-297.57K | $85.61K | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2005 | -3.93x | $-199.61K | $50.77K | ▲ +40.2% |
| 2004 | -6.57x | $-237.85K | $36.20K | ▼ -1405.4% |
| 2003 | -0.44x | $-32.03K | $73.39K | ▲ +41.1% |
| 2002 | -0.74x | $-22.20K | $29.98K | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2001 | -0.81x | $-26.45K | $32.68K | ▼ -2853.1% |
| 2000 | -0.03x | $-1.42K | $51.80K | ▲ +85.7% |
| 1999 | -0.19x | $-9.79K | $51.09K | — |