Neogen Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Neogen Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Neogen Corporation (NEOG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of August 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $12.90 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.22 Billion) in one year. Check Neogen Corporation cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Neogen Corporation (1992–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Neogen Corporation from 1992 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Neogen Corporation across 35 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Neogen Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Neogen Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1992–2026)
Neogen Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1992 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Neogen Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Neogen Corporation (NEOG) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.07x | $83.20 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▲ +56.5% |
| 2025 | 0.04x | $58.24 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▲ +69.0% |
| 2024 | 0.03x | $35.26 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $41.03 Million | $1.42 Billion | ▼ -95.5% |
| 2022 | 0.64x | $68.04 Million | $105.56 Million | ▼ -36.6% |
| 2021 | 1.02x | $81.09 Million | $79.81 Million | ▼ -14.8% |
| 2020 | 1.19x | $85.88 Million | $72.00 Million | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2019 | 1.10x | $63.84 Million | $57.84 Million | ▼ -7.7% |
| 2018 | 1.20x | $69.13 Million | $57.83 Million | ▲ +12.4% |
| 2017 | 1.06x | $60.27 Million | $56.65 Million | ▲ +43.2% |
| 2016 | 0.74x | $35.33 Million | $47.55 Million | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2015 | 1.06x | $43.79 Million | $41.22 Million | ▲ +91.2% |
| 2014 | 0.56x | $21.67 Million | $39.00 Million | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2013 | 0.86x | $26.56 Million | $30.96 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2012 | 0.68x | $22.28 Million | $32.55 Million | ▼ -27.2% |
| 2011 | 0.94x | $28.84 Million | $30.68 Million | ▼ -8.7% |
| 2010 | 1.03x | $27.99 Million | $27.18 Million | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2009 | 0.81x | $10.98 Million | $13.50 Million | ▲ +56.2% |
| 2008 | 0.52x | $7.87 Million | $15.11 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2007 | 0.76x | $10.16 Million | $13.34 Million | ▲ +46.8% |
| 2006 | 0.52x | $12.31 Million | $23.74 Million | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2005 | 0.74x | $6.72 Million | $9.05 Million | ▲ +202.3% |
| 2004 | 0.25x | $2.98 Million | $12.13 Million | ▼ -75.7% |
| 2003 | 1.01x | $6.70 Million | $6.63 Million | ▲ +29.6% |
| 2002 | 0.78x | $3.40 Million | $4.36 Million | ▲ +15.0% |
| 2001 | 0.68x | $2.50 Million | $3.69 Million | ▼ -46.1% |
| 2000 | 1.26x | $4.68 Million | $3.72 Million | ▼ -21.9% |
| 1999 | 1.61x | $3.70 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +93.0% |
| 1998 | 0.83x | $1.50 Million | $1.80 Million | ▼ -23.9% |
| 1997 | 1.10x | $2.30 Million | $2.10 Million | ▲ +216.4% |
| 1996 | 0.35x | $900.00K | $2.60 Million | ▲ +286.9% |
| 1995 | -0.19x | $-500.00K | $2.70 Million | ▼ -115.3% |
| 1994 | 1.21x | $1.70 Million | $1.40 Million | ▲ +464.3% |
| 1993 | -0.33x | $-400.00K | $1.20 Million | ▲ +42.9% |
| 1992 | -0.58x | $-700.00K | $1.20 Million | — |