Natural Health Trend (NHTC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Natural Health Trend (NHTC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.10x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.36 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($14.01 Million) in one year. See financial agility of Natural Health Trend to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Natural Health Trend Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Natural Health Trend across 33 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Natural Health Trend cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Natural Health Trend (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Natural Health Trend. Check cash flow quality index of Natural Health Trend to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.40x | $-6.00 Million | $15.00 Million | ▼ -167.0% |
| 2024 | -0.15x | $-3.37 Million | $22.49 Million | ▲ +3.8% |
| 2023 | -0.16x | $-4.28 Million | $27.49 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2022 | -0.15x | $-4.85 Million | $32.67 Million | ▼ -668.2% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $1.02 Million | $38.87 Million | ▼ -47.0% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $1.89 Million | $38.24 Million | ▲ +111.5% |
| 2019 | -0.43x | $-18.64 Million | $43.43 Million | ▼ -198.3% |
| 2018 | 0.44x | $29.71 Million | $68.06 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2017 | 0.39x | $26.61 Million | $68.93 Million | ▲ +275.1% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $2.55 Billion | $24.79 Billion | ▼ -87.3% |
| 2016 | 0.81x | $53.17 Million | $65.61 Million | ▲ +468.6% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $2.56 Billion | $17.95 Billion | ▼ -88.2% |
| 2015 | 1.21x | $81.33 Million | $67.34 Million | ▲ +1248.2% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $1.73 Billion | $19.31 Billion | ▼ -92.4% |
| 2014 | 1.17x | $30.61 Million | $26.09 Million | ▲ +51.0% |
| 2013 | 0.78x | $10.69 Million | $13.75 Million | ▲ +121.5% |
| 2012 | 0.35x | $2.21 Million | $6.31 Million | ▲ +66.3% |
| 2011 | 0.21x | $1.46 Million | $6.93 Million | ▲ +691.5% |
| 2010 | -0.04x | $-292.00K | $8.18 Million | ▲ +81.0% |
| 2009 | -0.19x | $-1.64 Million | $8.78 Million | ▲ +25.6% |
| 2008 | -0.25x | $-2.73 Million | $10.84 Million | ▲ +71.2% |
| 2007 | -0.88x | $-13.22 Million | $15.10 Million | ▼ -155.2% |
| 2006 | -0.34x | $-7.40 Million | $21.59 Million | ▼ -742.2% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $1.43 Million | $26.70 Million | ▲ +205.4% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $428.00K | $24.48 Million | ▼ -97.1% |
| 2003 | 0.60x | $9.53 Million | $15.87 Million | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2002 | 0.67x | $4.70 Million | $7.04 Million | ▲ +10546.2% |
| 2001 | 0.01x | $34.08K | $5.43 Million | ▲ +102.3% |
| 2000 | -0.27x | $-1.73 Million | $6.33 Million | ▼ -224.0% |
| 1999 | -0.08x | $-715.09K | $8.47 Million | ▲ +94.2% |
| 1998 | -1.46x | $-4.78 Million | $3.28 Million | ▼ -605.4% |
| 1997 | -0.21x | $-2.36 Million | $11.41 Million | ▼ -10.8% |
| 1996 | -0.19x | $-802.07K | $4.30 Million | — |