Natural Health Trend Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Natural Health Trend cash flow-to-debt ratio. Natural Health Trend (NHTC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.10x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.36 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($14.01 Million) in one year. Check NHTC operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Natural Health Trend (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Natural Health Trend from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Natural Health Trend across 33 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Natural Health Trend reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Natural Health Trend Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Natural Health Trend cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Natural Health Trend. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see NHTC cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.40x | $-6.00 Million | $15.00 Million | ▼ -167.0% |
| 2024 | -0.15x | $-3.37 Million | $22.49 Million | ▲ +3.8% |
| 2023 | -0.16x | $-4.28 Million | $27.49 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2022 | -0.15x | $-4.85 Million | $32.67 Million | ▼ -668.2% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $1.02 Million | $38.87 Million | ▼ -47.0% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $1.89 Million | $38.24 Million | ▲ +111.5% |
| 2019 | -0.43x | $-18.64 Million | $43.43 Million | ▼ -198.3% |
| 2018 | 0.44x | $29.71 Million | $68.06 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2017 | 0.39x | $26.61 Million | $68.93 Million | ▲ +275.1% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $2.55 Billion | $24.79 Billion | ▼ -87.3% |
| 2016 | 0.81x | $53.17 Million | $65.61 Million | ▲ +468.6% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $2.56 Billion | $17.95 Billion | ▼ -88.2% |
| 2015 | 1.21x | $81.33 Million | $67.34 Million | ▲ +1248.2% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $1.73 Billion | $19.31 Billion | ▼ -92.4% |
| 2014 | 1.17x | $30.61 Million | $26.09 Million | ▲ +51.0% |
| 2013 | 0.78x | $10.69 Million | $13.75 Million | ▲ +121.5% |
| 2012 | 0.35x | $2.21 Million | $6.31 Million | ▲ +66.3% |
| 2011 | 0.21x | $1.46 Million | $6.93 Million | ▲ +691.5% |
| 2010 | -0.04x | $-292.00K | $8.18 Million | ▲ +81.0% |
| 2009 | -0.19x | $-1.64 Million | $8.78 Million | ▲ +25.6% |
| 2008 | -0.25x | $-2.73 Million | $10.84 Million | ▲ +71.2% |
| 2007 | -0.88x | $-13.22 Million | $15.10 Million | ▼ -155.2% |
| 2006 | -0.34x | $-7.40 Million | $21.59 Million | ▼ -742.2% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $1.43 Million | $26.70 Million | ▲ +205.4% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $428.00K | $24.48 Million | ▼ -97.1% |
| 2003 | 0.60x | $9.53 Million | $15.87 Million | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2002 | 0.67x | $4.70 Million | $7.04 Million | ▲ +10546.2% |
| 2001 | 0.01x | $34.08K | $5.43 Million | ▲ +102.3% |
| 2000 | -0.27x | $-1.73 Million | $6.33 Million | ▼ -224.0% |
| 1999 | -0.08x | $-715.09K | $8.47 Million | ▲ +94.2% |
| 1998 | -1.46x | $-4.78 Million | $3.28 Million | ▼ -605.4% |
| 1997 | -0.21x | $-2.36 Million | $11.41 Million | ▼ -10.8% |
| 1996 | -0.19x | $-802.07K | $4.30 Million | — |