Natural Health Trend (NHTC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Natural Health Trend (NHTC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-797.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($15.49 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Natural Health Trend to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Natural Health Trend Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Natural Health Trend across 33 annual periods. Also explore Natural Health Trend (NHTC) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Natural Health Trend (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Natural Health Trend. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Natural Health Trend worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.40x | $-6.00 Million | $15.00 Million | ▼ -167.0% |
| 2024 | -0.15x | $-3.37 Million | $22.49 Million | ▲ +3.8% |
| 2023 | -0.16x | $-4.28 Million | $27.49 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2022 | -0.15x | $-4.85 Million | $32.67 Million | ▼ -668.2% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $1.02 Million | $38.87 Million | ▼ -47.0% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $1.89 Million | $38.24 Million | ▲ +111.5% |
| 2019 | -0.43x | $-18.64 Million | $43.43 Million | ▼ -198.3% |
| 2018 | 0.44x | $29.71 Million | $68.06 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2017 | 0.39x | $26.61 Million | $68.93 Million | ▲ +275.1% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $2.55 Billion | $24.79 Billion | ▼ -87.3% |
| 2016 | 0.81x | $53.17 Million | $65.61 Million | ▲ +468.6% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $2.56 Billion | $17.95 Billion | ▼ -88.2% |
| 2015 | 1.21x | $81.33 Million | $67.34 Million | ▲ +1248.2% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $1.73 Billion | $19.31 Billion | ▼ -92.4% |
| 2014 | 1.17x | $30.61 Million | $26.09 Million | ▲ +51.0% |
| 2013 | 0.78x | $10.69 Million | $13.75 Million | ▲ +121.5% |
| 2012 | 0.35x | $2.21 Million | $6.31 Million | ▲ +66.3% |
| 2011 | 0.21x | $1.46 Million | $6.93 Million | ▲ +691.5% |
| 2010 | -0.04x | $-292.00K | $8.18 Million | ▲ +81.0% |
| 2009 | -0.19x | $-1.64 Million | $8.78 Million | ▲ +25.6% |
| 2008 | -0.25x | $-2.73 Million | $10.84 Million | ▲ +71.2% |
| 2007 | -0.88x | $-13.22 Million | $15.10 Million | ▼ -155.2% |
| 2006 | -0.34x | $-7.40 Million | $21.59 Million | ▼ -742.2% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $1.43 Million | $26.70 Million | ▲ +205.4% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $428.00K | $24.48 Million | ▼ -97.1% |
| 2003 | 0.60x | $9.53 Million | $15.87 Million | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2002 | 0.67x | $4.70 Million | $7.04 Million | ▲ +10546.2% |
| 2001 | 0.01x | $34.08K | $5.43 Million | ▲ +102.3% |
| 2000 | -0.27x | $-1.73 Million | $6.33 Million | ▼ -224.0% |
| 1999 | -0.08x | $-715.09K | $8.47 Million | ▲ +94.2% |
| 1998 | -1.46x | $-4.78 Million | $3.28 Million | ▼ -605.4% |
| 1997 | -0.21x | $-2.36 Million | $11.41 Million | ▼ -10.8% |
| 1996 | -0.19x | $-802.07K | $4.30 Million | — |