Natural Health Trend (NHTC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Natural Health Trend (NHTC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-797.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($15.49 Million) in one year. Explore investment intensity of Natural Health Trend to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Natural Health Trend Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Natural Health Trend across 33 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Natural Health Trend for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Natural Health Trend (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Natural Health Trend. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Natural Health Trend (NHTC) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.40x | $-6.00 Million | $15.00 Million | ▼ -167.0% |
| 2024 | -0.15x | $-3.37 Million | $22.49 Million | ▲ +3.8% |
| 2023 | -0.16x | $-4.28 Million | $27.49 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2022 | -0.15x | $-4.85 Million | $32.67 Million | ▼ -668.2% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $1.02 Million | $38.87 Million | ▼ -47.0% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $1.89 Million | $38.24 Million | ▲ +111.5% |
| 2019 | -0.43x | $-18.64 Million | $43.43 Million | ▼ -198.3% |
| 2018 | 0.44x | $29.71 Million | $68.06 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2017 | 0.39x | $26.61 Million | $68.93 Million | ▲ +275.1% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $2.55 Billion | $24.79 Billion | ▼ -87.3% |
| 2016 | 0.81x | $53.17 Million | $65.61 Million | ▲ +468.6% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $2.56 Billion | $17.95 Billion | ▼ -88.2% |
| 2015 | 1.21x | $81.33 Million | $67.34 Million | ▲ +1248.2% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $1.73 Billion | $19.31 Billion | ▼ -92.4% |
| 2014 | 1.17x | $30.61 Million | $26.09 Million | ▲ +51.0% |
| 2013 | 0.78x | $10.69 Million | $13.75 Million | ▲ +121.5% |
| 2012 | 0.35x | $2.21 Million | $6.31 Million | ▲ +66.3% |
| 2011 | 0.21x | $1.46 Million | $6.93 Million | ▲ +691.5% |
| 2010 | -0.04x | $-292.00K | $8.18 Million | ▲ +81.0% |
| 2009 | -0.19x | $-1.64 Million | $8.78 Million | ▲ +25.6% |
| 2008 | -0.25x | $-2.73 Million | $10.84 Million | ▲ +71.2% |
| 2007 | -0.88x | $-13.22 Million | $15.10 Million | ▼ -155.2% |
| 2006 | -0.34x | $-7.40 Million | $21.59 Million | ▼ -742.2% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $1.43 Million | $26.70 Million | ▲ +205.4% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $428.00K | $24.48 Million | ▼ -97.1% |
| 2003 | 0.60x | $9.53 Million | $15.87 Million | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2002 | 0.67x | $4.70 Million | $7.04 Million | ▲ +10546.2% |
| 2001 | 0.01x | $34.08K | $5.43 Million | ▲ +102.3% |
| 2000 | -0.27x | $-1.73 Million | $6.33 Million | ▼ -224.0% |
| 1999 | -0.08x | $-715.09K | $8.47 Million | ▲ +94.2% |
| 1998 | -1.46x | $-4.78 Million | $3.28 Million | ▼ -605.4% |
| 1997 | -0.21x | $-2.36 Million | $11.41 Million | ▼ -10.8% |
| 1996 | -0.19x | $-802.07K | $4.30 Million | — |