NetApp Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
NetApp Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. NetApp Inc (NTAP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $127.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.64 Billion) in one year. Check how aggressively does NetApp Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of NetApp Inc (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of NetApp Inc from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for NetApp Inc across 30 annual periods. Check NTAP cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
NetApp Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
NetApp Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for NetApp Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see NTAP cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.15x | $1.51 Billion | $9.78 Billion | ▼ -20.1% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | $1.69 Billion | $8.74 Billion | ▲ +50.8% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $1.11 Billion | $8.66 Billion | ▼ -3.0% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | $1.21 Billion | $9.19 Billion | ▼ -14.2% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | $1.33 Billion | $8.68 Billion | ▲ +5.5% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $1.06 Billion | $7.28 Billion | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $1.34 Billion | $7.65 Billion | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | $1.48 Billion | $7.80 Billion | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | $986.00 Million | $6.71 Billion | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $974.00 Million | $7.16 Billion | ▼ -35.7% |
| 2015 | 0.21x | $1.27 Billion | $5.99 Billion | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2014 | 0.25x | $1.35 Billion | $5.43 Billion | ▲ +16.9% |
| 2013 | 0.21x | $1.39 Billion | $6.52 Billion | ▼ -24.8% |
| 2012 | 0.28x | $1.46 Billion | $5.18 Billion | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2011 | 0.29x | $1.35 Billion | $4.65 Billion | ▲ +17.6% |
| 2010 | 0.25x | $975.00 Million | $3.96 Billion | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2009 | 0.23x | $889.23 Million | $3.81 Billion | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2008 | 0.43x | $1.01 Billion | $2.37 Billion | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2007 | 0.52x | $864.46 Million | $1.67 Billion | ▲ +24.9% |
| 2006 | 0.41x | $554.28 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2005 | 0.65x | $462.12 Million | $711.84 Million | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2004 | 0.67x | $310.89 Million | $461.42 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 2003 | 0.59x | $195.25 Million | $331.82 Million | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2002 | 0.57x | $143.89 Million | $250.33 Million | ▼ -39.0% |
| 2001 | 0.94x | $218.35 Million | $231.80 Million | ▼ -9.5% |
| 2000 | 1.04x | $118.08 Million | $113.49 Million | ▲ +14.6% |
| 1999 | 0.91x | $45.95 Million | $50.62 Million | ▲ +17.7% |
| 1998 | 0.77x | $22.73 Million | $29.47 Million | ▲ +83.4% |
| 1997 | 0.42x | $6.27 Million | $14.91 Million | ▼ -23.0% |
| 1996 | 0.55x | $3.50 Million | $6.42 Million | — |