NetApp Inc (NTAP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
NetApp Inc (NTAP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $127.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.64 Billion) in one year. See NTAP financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
NetApp Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for NetApp Inc across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of NetApp Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for NetApp Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for NetApp Inc. Check how high is NetApp Inc's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.15x | $1.51 Billion | $9.78 Billion | ▼ -20.1% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | $1.69 Billion | $8.74 Billion | ▲ +50.8% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $1.11 Billion | $8.66 Billion | ▼ -3.0% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | $1.21 Billion | $9.19 Billion | ▼ -14.2% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | $1.33 Billion | $8.68 Billion | ▲ +5.5% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $1.06 Billion | $7.28 Billion | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $1.34 Billion | $7.65 Billion | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | $1.48 Billion | $7.80 Billion | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | $986.00 Million | $6.71 Billion | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $974.00 Million | $7.16 Billion | ▼ -35.7% |
| 2015 | 0.21x | $1.27 Billion | $5.99 Billion | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2014 | 0.25x | $1.35 Billion | $5.43 Billion | ▲ +16.9% |
| 2013 | 0.21x | $1.39 Billion | $6.52 Billion | ▼ -24.8% |
| 2012 | 0.28x | $1.46 Billion | $5.18 Billion | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2011 | 0.29x | $1.35 Billion | $4.65 Billion | ▲ +17.6% |
| 2010 | 0.25x | $975.00 Million | $3.96 Billion | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2009 | 0.23x | $889.23 Million | $3.81 Billion | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2008 | 0.43x | $1.01 Billion | $2.37 Billion | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2007 | 0.52x | $864.46 Million | $1.67 Billion | ▲ +24.9% |
| 2006 | 0.41x | $554.28 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2005 | 0.65x | $462.12 Million | $711.84 Million | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2004 | 0.67x | $310.89 Million | $461.42 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 2003 | 0.59x | $195.25 Million | $331.82 Million | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2002 | 0.57x | $143.89 Million | $250.33 Million | ▼ -39.0% |
| 2001 | 0.94x | $218.35 Million | $231.80 Million | ▼ -9.5% |
| 2000 | 1.04x | $118.08 Million | $113.49 Million | ▲ +14.6% |
| 1999 | 0.91x | $45.95 Million | $50.62 Million | ▲ +17.7% |
| 1998 | 0.77x | $22.73 Million | $29.47 Million | ▲ +83.4% |
| 1997 | 0.42x | $6.27 Million | $14.91 Million | ▼ -23.0% |
| 1996 | 0.55x | $3.50 Million | $6.42 Million | — |