NetApp Inc (NTAP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
NetApp Inc (NTAP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $127.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.64 Billion) in one year. See NetApp Inc (NTAP) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
NetApp Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for NetApp Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of NetApp Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for NetApp Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for NetApp Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see NetApp Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.15x | $1.51 Billion | $9.78 Billion | ▼ -20.1% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | $1.69 Billion | $8.74 Billion | ▲ +50.8% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $1.11 Billion | $8.66 Billion | ▼ -3.0% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | $1.21 Billion | $9.19 Billion | ▼ -14.2% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | $1.33 Billion | $8.68 Billion | ▲ +5.5% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $1.06 Billion | $7.28 Billion | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $1.34 Billion | $7.65 Billion | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | $1.48 Billion | $7.80 Billion | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | $986.00 Million | $6.71 Billion | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $974.00 Million | $7.16 Billion | ▼ -35.7% |
| 2015 | 0.21x | $1.27 Billion | $5.99 Billion | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2014 | 0.25x | $1.35 Billion | $5.43 Billion | ▲ +16.9% |
| 2013 | 0.21x | $1.39 Billion | $6.52 Billion | ▼ -24.8% |
| 2012 | 0.28x | $1.46 Billion | $5.18 Billion | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2011 | 0.29x | $1.35 Billion | $4.65 Billion | ▲ +17.6% |
| 2010 | 0.25x | $975.00 Million | $3.96 Billion | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2009 | 0.23x | $889.23 Million | $3.81 Billion | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2008 | 0.43x | $1.01 Billion | $2.37 Billion | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2007 | 0.52x | $864.46 Million | $1.67 Billion | ▲ +24.9% |
| 2006 | 0.41x | $554.28 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2005 | 0.65x | $462.12 Million | $711.84 Million | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2004 | 0.67x | $310.89 Million | $461.42 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 2003 | 0.59x | $195.25 Million | $331.82 Million | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2002 | 0.57x | $143.89 Million | $250.33 Million | ▼ -39.0% |
| 2001 | 0.94x | $218.35 Million | $231.80 Million | ▼ -9.5% |
| 2000 | 1.04x | $118.08 Million | $113.49 Million | ▲ +14.6% |
| 1999 | 0.91x | $45.95 Million | $50.62 Million | ▲ +17.7% |
| 1998 | 0.77x | $22.73 Million | $29.47 Million | ▲ +83.4% |
| 1997 | 0.42x | $6.27 Million | $14.91 Million | ▼ -23.0% |
| 1996 | 0.55x | $3.50 Million | $6.42 Million | — |