Novavax Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Novavax Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Novavax Inc (NVAX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-75.41 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.15 Billion) in one year. Check NVAX cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Novavax Inc (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Novavax Inc from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Novavax Inc across 30 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Novavax Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Novavax Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Novavax Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Novavax Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Novavax Inc operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.19x | $-244.63 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -369.5% |
| 2024 | -0.04x | $-87.26 Million | $2.18 Billion | ▲ +85.9% |
| 2023 | -0.28x | $-713.97 Million | $2.51 Billion | ▼ -97.5% |
| 2022 | -0.14x | $-415.94 Million | $2.89 Billion | ▼ -230.4% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $322.95 Million | $2.93 Billion | ▲ +347.6% |
| 2020 | -0.04x | $-42.54 Million | $955.27 Million | ▲ +88.3% |
| 2019 | -0.38x | $-136.62 Million | $358.97 Million | ▲ +22.6% |
| 2018 | -0.49x | $-184.82 Million | $375.91 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 2017 | -0.34x | $-138.70 Million | $404.23 Million | ▲ +46.3% |
| 2016 | -0.64x | $-255.47 Million | $399.85 Million | ▲ +52.7% |
| 2015 | -1.35x | $-126.09 Million | $93.37 Million | ▲ +6.5% |
| 2014 | -1.44x | $-67.01 Million | $46.38 Million | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2013 | -1.39x | $-45.36 Million | $32.70 Million | ▼ -68.2% |
| 2012 | -0.82x | $-18.23 Million | $22.11 Million | ▲ +55.6% |
| 2011 | -1.86x | $-23.63 Million | $12.73 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2010 | -2.08x | $-32.85 Million | $15.79 Million | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2009 | -2.95x | $-32.83 Million | $11.14 Million | ▼ -277.5% |
| 2008 | -0.78x | $-24.31 Million | $31.14 Million | ▲ +17.6% |
| 2007 | -0.95x | $-26.74 Million | $28.23 Million | ▼ -78.3% |
| 2006 | -0.53x | $-14.81 Million | $27.88 Million | ▼ -217.6% |
| 2005 | -0.17x | $-5.81 Million | $34.73 Million | ▲ +75.2% |
| 2004 | -0.67x | $-30.10 Million | $44.71 Million | ▼ -85.0% |
| 2003 | -0.36x | $-17.55 Million | $48.22 Million | ▲ +14.6% |
| 2002 | -0.43x | $-21.07 Million | $49.43 Million | ▼ -269.8% |
| 2001 | -0.12x | $-4.57 Million | $39.62 Million | ▲ +71.7% |
| 2000 | -0.41x | $-10.04 Million | $24.70 Million | ▲ +81.3% |
| 1999 | -2.18x | $-3.70 Million | $1.70 Million | ▲ +51.6% |
| 1998 | -4.50x | $-3.60 Million | $800.00K | ▲ +67.9% |
| 1997 | -14.00x | $-4.20 Million | $300.00K | ▼ -154.5% |
| 1996 | -5.50x | $-3.30 Million | $600.00K | — |