Novavax Inc (NVAX) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Novavax Inc (NVAX) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of June 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($0.00) from net assets ($37.62 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore Novavax Inc net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Novavax Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1996–2020)
This chart shows how Novavax Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 21 annual periods from 1996 to 2020. As of June 2025, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of $37.62 Million with intangible assets of $0.00 USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see market value of Novavax Inc.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Novavax Inc (1996–2020)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Novavax Inc from 1996 to 2020, covering 21 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. Explore NVAX capex to operating cash flow ratio to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 99.1% | $627.21 Million | $5.72 Million | $1.58 Billion | ▲ +2.8 pp |
| 2015 | 96.3% | $292.67 Million | $10.79 Million | $386.04 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2014 | 94.5% | $229.62 Million | $12.58 Million | $276.00 Million | ▲ +2.5 pp |
| 2013 | 92.0% | $203.23 Million | $16.25 Million | $235.94 Million | ▲ +33.3 pp |
| 2012 | 58.7% | $80.24 Million | $33.14 Million | $102.34 Million | ▲ +20.2 pp |
| 2011 | 38.5% | $53.85 Million | $33.14 Million | $66.58 Million | ▼ -5.4 pp |
| 2010 | 43.9% | $59.05 Million | $33.14 Million | $74.84 Million | ▼ -11.6 pp |
| 2009 | 55.5% | $74.47 Million | $33.14 Million | $85.61 Million | ▲ +28.3 pp |
| 2008 | 27.1% | $45.49 Million | $33.14 Million | $76.62 Million | ▼ -20.3 pp |
| 2007 | 47.4% | $63.06 Million | $33.14 Million | $91.29 Million | ▼ -51.5 pp |
| 2006 | 99.0% | $94.00 Million | $978.00K | $121.88 Million | ▲ +67.9 pp |
| 2005 | 31.0% | $49.65 Million | $34.25 Million | $84.38 Million | ▼ -53.8 pp |
| 2004 | 84.8% | $33.28 Million | $5.05 Million | $77.99 Million | ▲ +86.2 pp |
| 2003 | -1.4% | $35.94 Million | $36.45 Million | $84.16 Million | ▲ +358.2 pp |
| 2002 | -359.6% | $8.07 Million | $37.11 Million | $57.51 Million | ▼ -322.3 pp |
| 2001 | -37.4% | $27.49 Million | $37.76 Million | $67.11 Million | ▼ -19.3 pp |
| 2000 | -18.0% | $31.82 Million | $37.57 Million | $56.53 Million | ▼ -60.9 pp |
| 1999 | 42.9% | $2.80 Million | $1.60 Million | $4.50 Million | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 1998 | 46.7% | $3.00 Million | $1.60 Million | $3.80 Million | ▼ -53.3 pp |
| 1997 | 100.0% | $6.50 Million | $0.00 | $6.80 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1996 | 100.0% | $5.10 Million | $0.00 | $5.70 Million | — |