Newell Rubbermaid Inc. (NWL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Newell Rubbermaid Inc. (NWL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $161.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.32 Billion) in one year. Explore Newell Rubbermaid Inc. long-term investment allocation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Newell Rubbermaid Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Newell Rubbermaid Inc. across 37 annual periods. Also explore Newell Rubbermaid Inc. total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Newell Rubbermaid Inc. (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Newell Rubbermaid Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Newell Rubbermaid Inc. worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.03x | $264.00 Million | $8.32 Billion | ▼ -47.2% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $496.00 Million | $8.25 Billion | ▼ -41.5% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $930.00 Million | $9.05 Billion | ▲ +468.1% |
| 2022 | -0.03x | $-272.00 Million | $9.74 Billion | ▼ -131.9% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $884.00 Million | $10.11 Billion | ▼ -34.1% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | $1.43 Billion | $10.80 Billion | ▲ +35.2% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $1.04 Billion | $10.65 Billion | ▲ +79.4% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | $680.00 Million | $12.44 Billion | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2017 | 0.05x | $932.00 Million | $18.95 Billion | ▼ -39.6% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $1.83 Billion | $22.45 Billion | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | $565.80 Million | $5.45 Billion | ▼ -20.6% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | $634.10 Million | $4.85 Billion | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | $605.20 Million | $4.00 Billion | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $618.50 Million | $4.22 Billion | ▲ +12.4% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $561.30 Million | $4.31 Billion | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | $582.60 Million | $4.50 Billion | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2009 | 0.13x | $602.80 Million | $4.64 Billion | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | $454.90 Million | $5.18 Billion | ▼ -40.5% |
| 2007 | 0.15x | $655.30 Million | $4.44 Billion | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2006 | 0.15x | $643.40 Million | $4.42 Billion | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | $641.60 Million | $4.80 Billion | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2004 | 0.13x | $660.00 Million | $4.90 Billion | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | $773.20 Million | $5.46 Billion | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $868.90 Million | $5.32 Billion | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2001 | 0.18x | $865.42 Million | $4.83 Billion | ▲ +23.8% |
| 2000 | 0.14x | $623.49 Million | $4.31 Billion | ▼ -8.0% |
| 1999 | 0.16x | $554.00 Million | $3.53 Billion | ▼ -0.6% |
| 1998 | 0.16x | $302.60 Million | $1.92 Billion | ▼ -9.3% |
| 1997 | 0.17x | $387.10 Million | $2.22 Billion | ▼ -28.2% |
| 1996 | 0.24x | $367.30 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▲ +43.1% |
| 1995 | 0.17x | $276.70 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▼ -3.0% |
| 1994 | 0.17x | $238.40 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▲ +465.9% |
| 1993 | 0.03x | $30.10 Million | $973.80 Million | ▼ -90.8% |
| 1992 | 0.34x | $238.20 Million | $710.20 Million | ▼ -32.1% |
| 1991 | 0.49x | $214.10 Million | $433.20 Million | ▲ +27.8% |
| 1990 | 0.39x | $140.10 Million | $362.40 Million | ▲ +41.1% |
| 1989 | 0.27x | $113.80 Million | $415.50 Million | — |