Newell Rubbermaid Inc. (NWL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Newell Rubbermaid Inc. (NWL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $161.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.32 Billion) in one year. See Newell Rubbermaid Inc. free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Newell Rubbermaid Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Newell Rubbermaid Inc. across 37 annual periods. Also explore Newell Rubbermaid Inc. (NWL) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Newell Rubbermaid Inc. (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Newell Rubbermaid Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see NWL market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.03x | $264.00 Million | $8.32 Billion | ▼ -47.2% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $496.00 Million | $8.25 Billion | ▼ -41.5% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $930.00 Million | $9.05 Billion | ▲ +468.1% |
| 2022 | -0.03x | $-272.00 Million | $9.74 Billion | ▼ -131.9% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $884.00 Million | $10.11 Billion | ▼ -34.1% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | $1.43 Billion | $10.80 Billion | ▲ +35.2% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $1.04 Billion | $10.65 Billion | ▲ +79.4% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | $680.00 Million | $12.44 Billion | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2017 | 0.05x | $932.00 Million | $18.95 Billion | ▼ -39.6% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $1.83 Billion | $22.45 Billion | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | $565.80 Million | $5.45 Billion | ▼ -20.6% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | $634.10 Million | $4.85 Billion | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | $605.20 Million | $4.00 Billion | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $618.50 Million | $4.22 Billion | ▲ +12.4% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $561.30 Million | $4.31 Billion | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | $582.60 Million | $4.50 Billion | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2009 | 0.13x | $602.80 Million | $4.64 Billion | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | $454.90 Million | $5.18 Billion | ▼ -40.5% |
| 2007 | 0.15x | $655.30 Million | $4.44 Billion | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2006 | 0.15x | $643.40 Million | $4.42 Billion | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | $641.60 Million | $4.80 Billion | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2004 | 0.13x | $660.00 Million | $4.90 Billion | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | $773.20 Million | $5.46 Billion | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $868.90 Million | $5.32 Billion | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2001 | 0.18x | $865.42 Million | $4.83 Billion | ▲ +23.8% |
| 2000 | 0.14x | $623.49 Million | $4.31 Billion | ▼ -8.0% |
| 1999 | 0.16x | $554.00 Million | $3.53 Billion | ▼ -0.6% |
| 1998 | 0.16x | $302.60 Million | $1.92 Billion | ▼ -9.3% |
| 1997 | 0.17x | $387.10 Million | $2.22 Billion | ▼ -28.2% |
| 1996 | 0.24x | $367.30 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▲ +43.1% |
| 1995 | 0.17x | $276.70 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▼ -3.0% |
| 1994 | 0.17x | $238.40 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▲ +465.9% |
| 1993 | 0.03x | $30.10 Million | $973.80 Million | ▼ -90.8% |
| 1992 | 0.34x | $238.20 Million | $710.20 Million | ▼ -32.1% |
| 1991 | 0.49x | $214.10 Million | $433.20 Million | ▲ +27.8% |
| 1990 | 0.39x | $140.10 Million | $362.40 Million | ▲ +41.1% |
| 1989 | 0.27x | $113.80 Million | $415.50 Million | — |