Northwest Pipe Company (NWPX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Northwest Pipe Company (NWPX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $20.98 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($218.88 Million) in one year. See NWPX free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Northwest Pipe Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Northwest Pipe Company across 31 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Northwest Pipe Company to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Northwest Pipe Company (1994–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Northwest Pipe Company. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see NWPX company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.26x | $55.05 Million | $215.65 Million | ▲ +23.0% |
| 2023 | 0.21x | $53.45 Million | $257.52 Million | ▲ +235.0% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $17.54 Million | $283.07 Million | ▲ +381.8% |
| 2021 | -0.02x | $-5.81 Million | $264.30 Million | ▼ -104.1% |
| 2020 | 0.54x | $56.09 Million | $103.39 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2019 | 0.69x | $42.89 Million | $62.09 Million | ▲ +298.1% |
| 2018 | -0.35x | $-18.40 Million | $52.76 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2017 | -0.25x | $-7.52 Million | $30.06 Million | ▼ -632.6% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $1.52 Million | $32.34 Million | ▼ -96.4% |
| 2015 | 1.32x | $55.21 Million | $41.82 Million | ▲ +300.2% |
| 2014 | 0.33x | $35.04 Million | $106.25 Million | ▲ +181.8% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $20.09 Million | $171.61 Million | ▼ -57.1% |
| 2012 | 0.27x | $44.49 Million | $162.99 Million | ▲ +284.9% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | $12.28 Million | $173.11 Million | ▲ +160.6% |
| 2010 | -0.12x | $-22.17 Million | $189.56 Million | ▼ -121.4% |
| 2009 | 0.55x | $79.19 Million | $144.94 Million | ▲ +201854.4% |
| 2008 | 0.00x | $-59.00K | $217.87 Million | ▼ -100.3% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $19.32 Million | $197.28 Million | ▲ +866.6% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | $1.96 Million | $193.62 Million | ▼ -40.5% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $3.05 Million | $179.02 Million | ▲ +131.6% |
| 2004 | -0.05x | $-10.30 Million | $191.25 Million | ▼ -170.2% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | $11.38 Million | $148.36 Million | ▼ -51.4% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $25.21 Million | $159.58 Million | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | $15.14 Million | $148.34 Million | ▲ +255.7% |
| 2000 | -0.07x | $-11.49 Million | $175.31 Million | ▼ -165.2% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | $15.20 Million | $151.10 Million | ▲ +588.4% |
| 1998 | -0.02x | $-3.10 Million | $150.50 Million | ▲ +70.6% |
| 1997 | -0.07x | $-4.30 Million | $61.30 Million | ▼ -141.8% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $7.00 Million | $41.70 Million | ▲ +36.1% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $3.80 Million | $30.80 Million | ▲ +721.0% |
| 1994 | -0.02x | $-900.00K | $45.30 Million | — |