Northwest Pipe Company (NWPX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Northwest Pipe Company (NWPX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.13x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $29.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($230.41 Million) in one year. See Northwest Pipe Company leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Northwest Pipe Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Northwest Pipe Company across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Northwest Pipe Company generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Northwest Pipe Company (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Northwest Pipe Company. Check NWPX operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.36x | $67.28 Million | $184.85 Million | ▲ +42.6% |
| 2024 | 0.26x | $55.05 Million | $215.65 Million | ▲ +23.0% |
| 2023 | 0.21x | $53.45 Million | $257.52 Million | ▲ +235.0% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $17.54 Million | $283.07 Million | ▲ +381.8% |
| 2021 | -0.02x | $-5.81 Million | $264.30 Million | ▼ -104.1% |
| 2020 | 0.54x | $56.09 Million | $103.39 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2019 | 0.69x | $42.89 Million | $62.09 Million | ▲ +298.1% |
| 2018 | -0.35x | $-18.40 Million | $52.76 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2017 | -0.25x | $-7.52 Million | $30.06 Million | ▼ -632.6% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $1.52 Million | $32.34 Million | ▼ -96.4% |
| 2015 | 1.32x | $55.21 Million | $41.82 Million | ▲ +300.2% |
| 2014 | 0.33x | $35.04 Million | $106.25 Million | ▲ +181.8% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $20.09 Million | $171.61 Million | ▼ -57.1% |
| 2012 | 0.27x | $44.49 Million | $162.99 Million | ▲ +284.9% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | $12.28 Million | $173.11 Million | ▲ +160.6% |
| 2010 | -0.12x | $-22.17 Million | $189.56 Million | ▼ -121.4% |
| 2009 | 0.55x | $79.19 Million | $144.94 Million | ▲ +201854.4% |
| 2008 | 0.00x | $-59.00K | $217.87 Million | ▼ -100.3% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $19.32 Million | $197.28 Million | ▲ +866.6% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | $1.96 Million | $193.62 Million | ▼ -40.5% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $3.05 Million | $179.02 Million | ▲ +131.6% |
| 2004 | -0.05x | $-10.30 Million | $191.25 Million | ▼ -170.2% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | $11.38 Million | $148.36 Million | ▼ -51.4% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $25.21 Million | $159.58 Million | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | $15.14 Million | $148.34 Million | ▲ +255.7% |
| 2000 | -0.07x | $-11.49 Million | $175.31 Million | ▼ -165.2% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | $15.20 Million | $151.10 Million | ▲ +588.4% |
| 1998 | -0.02x | $-3.10 Million | $150.50 Million | ▲ +70.6% |
| 1997 | -0.07x | $-4.30 Million | $61.30 Million | ▼ -141.8% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $7.00 Million | $41.70 Million | ▲ +36.1% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $3.80 Million | $30.80 Million | ▲ +721.0% |
| 1994 | -0.02x | $-900.00K | $45.30 Million | — |