Oblong Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Oblong Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Oblong Inc (OBLG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.45x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.55 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($1.07 Million) in one year. Check Oblong Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Oblong Inc (1993–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Oblong Inc from 1993 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Oblong Inc across 32 annual periods. Check Oblong Inc investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Oblong Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2024)
Oblong Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Oblong Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Oblong Inc cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -2.68x | $-3.41 Million | $1.27 Million | ▼ -27.4% |
| 2023 | -2.10x | $-2.99 Million | $1.42 Million | ▲ +27.6% |
| 2022 | -2.90x | $-5.93 Million | $2.04 Million | ▼ -16.8% |
| 2021 | -2.49x | $-7.73 Million | $3.11 Million | ▼ -168.3% |
| 2020 | -0.93x | $-6.57 Million | $7.09 Million | ▼ -273.8% |
| 2019 | -0.25x | $-3.25 Million | $13.12 Million | ▲ +75.7% |
| 2018 | -1.02x | $-1.16 Million | $1.13 Million | ▼ -300.5% |
| 2017 | 0.51x | $1.61 Million | $3.16 Million | ▲ +3395.8% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $183.00K | $12.57 Million | ▼ -83.7% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $1.24 Million | $13.85 Million | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | $1.78 Million | $14.65 Million | ▼ -14.1% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | $2.30 Million | $16.22 Million | ▲ +181.8% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | $821.00K | $16.31 Million | ▼ -69.7% |
| 2011 | 0.17x | $752.00K | $4.53 Million | ▲ +165.1% |
| 2010 | -0.26x | $-1.44 Million | $5.66 Million | ▼ -1285.5% |
| 2009 | 0.02x | $124.00K | $5.76 Million | ▲ +117.7% |
| 2008 | -0.12x | $-1.26 Million | $10.39 Million | ▼ -66.7% |
| 2007 | -0.07x | $-1.88 Million | $25.73 Million | ▲ +68.9% |
| 2006 | -0.23x | $-4.69 Million | $19.98 Million | ▲ +80.3% |
| 2005 | -1.19x | $-13.67 Million | $11.44 Million | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2004 | -1.63x | $-9.09 Million | $5.58 Million | ▼ -23.4% |
| 2003 | -1.32x | $-6.83 Million | $5.17 Million | ▼ -134.0% |
| 2002 | -0.56x | $-14.05 Million | $24.92 Million | ▼ -29.3% |
| 2001 | -0.44x | $-15.52 Million | $35.59 Million | ▲ +18.4% |
| 2000 | -0.53x | $-13.29 Million | $24.86 Million | ▼ -795.6% |
| 1999 | -0.06x | $-1.20 Million | $20.10 Million | ▼ -280.1% |
| 1998 | -0.02x | $-300.00K | $19.10 Million | ▲ +80.4% |
| 1997 | -0.08x | $-1.40 Million | $17.50 Million | ▲ +53.0% |
| 1996 | -0.17x | $-2.40 Million | $14.10 Million | ▼ -121.3% |
| 1995 | -0.08x | $-300.00K | $3.90 Million | ▼ -148.1% |
| 1994 | 0.16x | $400.00K | $2.50 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 1993 | 0.24x | $400.00K | $1.70 Million | — |