Odyssey Marine Exploration Inc (OMEX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Odyssey Marine Exploration Inc (OMEX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.82 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($91.38 Million) in one year. See OMEX cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Odyssey Marine Exploration Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Odyssey Marine Exploration Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Odyssey Marine Exploration Inc growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Odyssey Marine Exploration Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Odyssey Marine Exploration Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Odyssey Marine Exploration Inc (OMEX) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.10x | $-8.85 Million | $91.38 Million | ▼ -1571.0% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $642.34K | $97.58 Million | ▲ +107.0% |
| 2023 | -0.09x | $-10.17 Million | $108.66 Million | ▲ +6.0% |
| 2022 | -0.10x | $-10.21 Million | $102.55 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 2021 | -0.08x | $-5.43 Million | $71.40 Million | ▲ +42.3% |
| 2020 | -0.13x | $-9.18 Million | $69.67 Million | ▼ -41.9% |
| 2019 | -0.09x | $-5.44 Million | $58.63 Million | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2018 | -0.14x | $-6.45 Million | $46.67 Million | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2017 | -0.14x | $-5.85 Million | $40.96 Million | ▲ +37.8% |
| 2016 | -0.23x | $-8.31 Million | $36.19 Million | ▲ +56.6% |
| 2015 | -0.53x | $-17.16 Million | $32.46 Million | ▲ +34.3% |
| 2014 | -0.80x | $-28.55 Million | $35.49 Million | ▼ -56.6% |
| 2013 | -0.51x | $-19.66 Million | $38.25 Million | ▼ -256.1% |
| 2012 | -0.14x | $-6.88 Million | $47.66 Million | ▲ +68.7% |
| 2011 | -0.46x | $-15.19 Million | $32.94 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2010 | -0.45x | $-12.16 Million | $26.96 Million | ▲ +54.5% |
| 2009 | -0.99x | $-12.60 Million | $12.69 Million | ▲ +42.9% |
| 2008 | -1.74x | $-21.43 Million | $12.34 Million | ▲ +3.9% |
| 2007 | -1.81x | $-15.11 Million | $8.36 Million | ▼ -35.7% |
| 2006 | -1.33x | $-13.11 Million | $9.84 Million | ▲ +35.7% |
| 2005 | -2.07x | $-10.98 Million | $5.30 Million | ▼ -516.5% |
| 2004 | 0.50x | $2.76 Million | $5.55 Million | ▲ +108.6% |
| 2003 | -5.78x | $-8.04 Million | $1.39 Million | ▼ -150.5% |
| 2002 | -2.31x | $-2.49 Million | $1.08 Million | ▼ -43.8% |
| 2001 | -1.60x | $-1.62 Million | $1.01 Million | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2000 | -1.20x | $-1.34 Million | $1.12 Million | ▼ -335.2% |
| 1999 | -0.28x | $-633.02K | $2.30 Million | ▲ +35.3% |
| 1998 | -0.43x | $-733.72K | $1.73 Million | ▲ +27.3% |
| 1997 | -0.59x | $-569.44K | $973.05K | ▼ -77.9% |
| 1996 | -0.33x | $-22.48K | $68.35K | ▲ +21.5% |
| 1995 | -0.42x | $-22.95K | $54.74K | — |