Odyssey Marine Exploration Inc (OMEX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Odyssey Marine Exploration Inc (OMEX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -50.14x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.67 Billion could theoretically repay -50% of its total liabilities ($93.16 Million) in one year. See OMEX FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Odyssey Marine Exploration Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Odyssey Marine Exploration Inc across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see OMEX cash generation efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Odyssey Marine Exploration Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Odyssey Marine Exploration Inc. Check OMEX operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.10x | $-8.85 Million | $91.38 Million | ▼ -1571.0% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $642.34K | $97.58 Million | ▲ +107.0% |
| 2023 | -0.09x | $-10.17 Million | $108.66 Million | ▲ +6.0% |
| 2022 | -0.10x | $-10.21 Million | $102.55 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 2021 | -0.08x | $-5.43 Million | $71.40 Million | ▲ +42.3% |
| 2020 | -0.13x | $-9.18 Million | $69.67 Million | ▼ -41.9% |
| 2019 | -0.09x | $-5.44 Million | $58.63 Million | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2018 | -0.14x | $-6.45 Million | $46.67 Million | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2017 | -0.14x | $-5.85 Million | $40.96 Million | ▲ +37.8% |
| 2016 | -0.23x | $-8.31 Million | $36.19 Million | ▲ +56.6% |
| 2015 | -0.53x | $-17.16 Million | $32.46 Million | ▲ +34.3% |
| 2014 | -0.80x | $-28.55 Million | $35.49 Million | ▼ -56.6% |
| 2013 | -0.51x | $-19.66 Million | $38.25 Million | ▼ -256.1% |
| 2012 | -0.14x | $-6.88 Million | $47.66 Million | ▲ +68.7% |
| 2011 | -0.46x | $-15.19 Million | $32.94 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2010 | -0.45x | $-12.16 Million | $26.96 Million | ▲ +54.5% |
| 2009 | -0.99x | $-12.60 Million | $12.69 Million | ▲ +42.9% |
| 2008 | -1.74x | $-21.43 Million | $12.34 Million | ▲ +3.9% |
| 2007 | -1.81x | $-15.11 Million | $8.36 Million | ▼ -35.7% |
| 2006 | -1.33x | $-13.11 Million | $9.84 Million | ▲ +35.7% |
| 2005 | -2.07x | $-10.98 Million | $5.30 Million | ▼ -516.5% |
| 2004 | 0.50x | $2.76 Million | $5.55 Million | ▲ +108.6% |
| 2003 | -5.78x | $-8.04 Million | $1.39 Million | ▼ -150.5% |
| 2002 | -2.31x | $-2.49 Million | $1.08 Million | ▼ -43.8% |
| 2001 | -1.60x | $-1.62 Million | $1.01 Million | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2000 | -1.20x | $-1.34 Million | $1.12 Million | ▼ -335.2% |
| 1999 | -0.28x | $-633.02K | $2.30 Million | ▲ +35.3% |
| 1998 | -0.43x | $-733.72K | $1.73 Million | ▲ +27.3% |
| 1997 | -0.59x | $-569.44K | $973.05K | ▼ -77.9% |
| 1996 | -0.33x | $-22.48K | $68.35K | ▲ +21.5% |
| 1995 | -0.42x | $-22.95K | $54.74K | — |