Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR (PLL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR (PLL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.17 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($40.90 Million) in one year. Explore PLL long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR across 30 annual periods. Also explore PLL asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR (1990–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see PLL market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.83x | $-42.91 Million | $51.64 Million | ▼ -2689.3% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $1.57 Million | $48.92 Million | ▲ +102.1% |
| 2022 | -1.50x | $-26.45 Million | $17.63 Million | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2021 | -2.18x | $-16.26 Million | $7.44 Million | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2020 | -4.58x | $-9.81 Million | $2.14 Million | ▼ -91.5% |
| 2019 | -2.39x | $-9.20 Million | $3.85 Million | ▲ +37.7% |
| 2018 | -3.84x | $-7.58 Million | $1.98 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2016 | -3.65x | $-1.76 Million | $482.96K | ▲ +68.8% |
| 2015 | -11.70x | $-553.36K | $47.29K | ▲ +60.8% |
| 2014 | -29.85x | $-1.29 Million | $43.15K | ▼ -201.4% |
| 2013 | -9.91x | $-3.03 Million | $305.87K | ▼ -20.8% |
| 2012 | -8.20x | $-2.45 Million | $298.92K | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2011 | -7.84x | $-1.52 Million | $193.90K | ▼ -205.6% |
| 2010 | -2.57x | $-710.27K | $276.91K | ▲ +67.8% |
| 2009 | -7.96x | $-777.45K | $97.64K | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2008 | -7.69x | $-1.36 Million | $177.40K | ▼ -849.9% |
| 2007 | -0.81x | $-472.49K | $583.54K | ▲ +70.6% |
| 2006 | -2.76x | $-1.20 Million | $436.39K | ▲ +82.9% |
| 2005 | -16.09x | $-453.71K | $28.20K | ▲ +98.9% |
| 2004 | -1463.61x | $-1.12 Million | $762.50 | ▼ -52464.7% |
| 2003 | -2.78x | $-6.03 Million | $2.16 Million | ▼ -140.7% |
| 2001 | -1.16x | $-1.39 Million | $1.20 Million | ▼ -288.9% |
| 2000 | 0.61x | $4.05 Million | $6.62 Million | ▲ +223.1% |
| 1996 | 0.19x | $2.55 Million | $13.45 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 1995 | 0.30x | $5.22 Million | $17.54 Million | ▲ +427.7% |
| 1994 | -0.09x | $-1.29 Million | $14.19 Million | ▼ -116.8% |
| 1993 | 0.54x | $6.67 Million | $12.35 Million | ▲ +37.6% |
| 1992 | 0.39x | $3.45 Million | $8.78 Million | ▼ -11.0% |
| 1991 | 0.44x | $4.09 Million | $9.26 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 1990 | 0.40x | $3.68 Million | $9.24 Million | — |