Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR (PLL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR (PLL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.17 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($40.90 Million) in one year. See Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see PLL cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR (1990–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR. Check PLL operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.83x | $-42.91 Million | $51.64 Million | ▼ -2689.3% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $1.57 Million | $48.92 Million | ▲ +102.1% |
| 2022 | -1.50x | $-26.45 Million | $17.63 Million | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2021 | -2.18x | $-16.26 Million | $7.44 Million | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2020 | -4.58x | $-9.81 Million | $2.14 Million | ▼ -91.5% |
| 2019 | -2.39x | $-9.20 Million | $3.85 Million | ▲ +37.7% |
| 2018 | -3.84x | $-7.58 Million | $1.98 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2016 | -3.65x | $-1.76 Million | $482.96K | ▲ +68.8% |
| 2015 | -11.70x | $-553.36K | $47.29K | ▲ +60.8% |
| 2014 | -29.85x | $-1.29 Million | $43.15K | ▼ -201.4% |
| 2013 | -9.91x | $-3.03 Million | $305.87K | ▼ -20.8% |
| 2012 | -8.20x | $-2.45 Million | $298.92K | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2011 | -7.84x | $-1.52 Million | $193.90K | ▼ -205.6% |
| 2010 | -2.57x | $-710.27K | $276.91K | ▲ +67.8% |
| 2009 | -7.96x | $-777.45K | $97.64K | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2008 | -7.69x | $-1.36 Million | $177.40K | ▼ -849.9% |
| 2007 | -0.81x | $-472.49K | $583.54K | ▲ +70.6% |
| 2006 | -2.76x | $-1.20 Million | $436.39K | ▲ +82.9% |
| 2005 | -16.09x | $-453.71K | $28.20K | ▲ +98.9% |
| 2004 | -1463.61x | $-1.12 Million | $762.50 | ▼ -52464.7% |
| 2003 | -2.78x | $-6.03 Million | $2.16 Million | ▼ -140.7% |
| 2001 | -1.16x | $-1.39 Million | $1.20 Million | ▼ -288.9% |
| 2000 | 0.61x | $4.05 Million | $6.62 Million | ▲ +223.1% |
| 1996 | 0.19x | $2.55 Million | $13.45 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 1995 | 0.30x | $5.22 Million | $17.54 Million | ▲ +427.7% |
| 1994 | -0.09x | $-1.29 Million | $14.19 Million | ▼ -116.8% |
| 1993 | 0.54x | $6.67 Million | $12.35 Million | ▲ +37.6% |
| 1992 | 0.39x | $3.45 Million | $8.78 Million | ▼ -11.0% |
| 1991 | 0.44x | $4.09 Million | $9.26 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 1990 | 0.40x | $3.68 Million | $9.24 Million | — |