Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR (PLL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR (PLL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.17 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($40.90 Million) in one year. See Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR across 30 annual periods. Also explore PLL shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR (1990–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.83x | $-42.91 Million | $51.64 Million | ▼ -2689.3% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $1.57 Million | $48.92 Million | ▲ +102.1% |
| 2022 | -1.50x | $-26.45 Million | $17.63 Million | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2021 | -2.18x | $-16.26 Million | $7.44 Million | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2020 | -4.58x | $-9.81 Million | $2.14 Million | ▼ -91.5% |
| 2019 | -2.39x | $-9.20 Million | $3.85 Million | ▲ +37.7% |
| 2018 | -3.84x | $-7.58 Million | $1.98 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2016 | -3.65x | $-1.76 Million | $482.96K | ▲ +68.8% |
| 2015 | -11.70x | $-553.36K | $47.29K | ▲ +60.8% |
| 2014 | -29.85x | $-1.29 Million | $43.15K | ▼ -201.4% |
| 2013 | -9.91x | $-3.03 Million | $305.87K | ▼ -20.8% |
| 2012 | -8.20x | $-2.45 Million | $298.92K | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2011 | -7.84x | $-1.52 Million | $193.90K | ▼ -205.6% |
| 2010 | -2.57x | $-710.27K | $276.91K | ▲ +67.8% |
| 2009 | -7.96x | $-777.45K | $97.64K | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2008 | -7.69x | $-1.36 Million | $177.40K | ▼ -849.9% |
| 2007 | -0.81x | $-472.49K | $583.54K | ▲ +70.6% |
| 2006 | -2.76x | $-1.20 Million | $436.39K | ▲ +82.9% |
| 2005 | -16.09x | $-453.71K | $28.20K | ▲ +98.9% |
| 2004 | -1463.61x | $-1.12 Million | $762.50 | ▼ -52464.7% |
| 2003 | -2.78x | $-6.03 Million | $2.16 Million | ▼ -140.7% |
| 2001 | -1.16x | $-1.39 Million | $1.20 Million | ▼ -288.9% |
| 2000 | 0.61x | $4.05 Million | $6.62 Million | ▲ +223.1% |
| 1996 | 0.19x | $2.55 Million | $13.45 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 1995 | 0.30x | $5.22 Million | $17.54 Million | ▲ +427.7% |
| 1994 | -0.09x | $-1.29 Million | $14.19 Million | ▼ -116.8% |
| 1993 | 0.54x | $6.67 Million | $12.35 Million | ▲ +37.6% |
| 1992 | 0.39x | $3.45 Million | $8.78 Million | ▼ -11.0% |
| 1991 | 0.44x | $4.09 Million | $9.26 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 1990 | 0.40x | $3.68 Million | $9.24 Million | — |