Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR cash flow-to-debt ratio. Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR (PLL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.17 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($40.90 Million) in one year. Check PLL cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR (1990–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR from 1990 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR across 30 annual periods. Check Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR (PLL) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2024)
Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Piedmont Lithium Ltd ADR (PLL) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.83x | $-42.91 Million | $51.64 Million | ▼ -2689.3% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $1.57 Million | $48.92 Million | ▲ +102.1% |
| 2022 | -1.50x | $-26.45 Million | $17.63 Million | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2021 | -2.18x | $-16.26 Million | $7.44 Million | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2020 | -4.58x | $-9.81 Million | $2.14 Million | ▼ -91.5% |
| 2019 | -2.39x | $-9.20 Million | $3.85 Million | ▲ +37.7% |
| 2018 | -3.84x | $-7.58 Million | $1.98 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2016 | -3.65x | $-1.76 Million | $482.96K | ▲ +68.8% |
| 2015 | -11.70x | $-553.36K | $47.29K | ▲ +60.8% |
| 2014 | -29.85x | $-1.29 Million | $43.15K | ▼ -201.4% |
| 2013 | -9.91x | $-3.03 Million | $305.87K | ▼ -20.8% |
| 2012 | -8.20x | $-2.45 Million | $298.92K | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2011 | -7.84x | $-1.52 Million | $193.90K | ▼ -205.6% |
| 2010 | -2.57x | $-710.27K | $276.91K | ▲ +67.8% |
| 2009 | -7.96x | $-777.45K | $97.64K | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2008 | -7.69x | $-1.36 Million | $177.40K | ▼ -849.9% |
| 2007 | -0.81x | $-472.49K | $583.54K | ▲ +70.6% |
| 2006 | -2.76x | $-1.20 Million | $436.39K | ▲ +82.9% |
| 2005 | -16.09x | $-453.71K | $28.20K | ▲ +98.9% |
| 2004 | -1463.61x | $-1.12 Million | $762.50 | ▼ -52464.7% |
| 2003 | -2.78x | $-6.03 Million | $2.16 Million | ▼ -140.7% |
| 2001 | -1.16x | $-1.39 Million | $1.20 Million | ▼ -288.9% |
| 2000 | 0.61x | $4.05 Million | $6.62 Million | ▲ +223.1% |
| 1996 | 0.19x | $2.55 Million | $13.45 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 1995 | 0.30x | $5.22 Million | $17.54 Million | ▲ +427.7% |
| 1994 | -0.09x | $-1.29 Million | $14.19 Million | ▼ -116.8% |
| 1993 | 0.54x | $6.67 Million | $12.35 Million | ▲ +37.6% |
| 1992 | 0.39x | $3.45 Million | $8.78 Million | ▼ -11.0% |
| 1991 | 0.44x | $4.09 Million | $9.26 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 1990 | 0.40x | $3.68 Million | $9.24 Million | — |