ePlus inc (PLUS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
ePlus inc (PLUS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.11x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-87.44 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($768.39 Million) in one year. See ePlus inc free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
ePlus inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for ePlus inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of ePlus inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for ePlus inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for ePlus inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of ePlus inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.33x | $302.14 Million | $907.18 Million | ▲ +0.8% |
| 2024 | 0.33x | $248.45 Million | $751.69 Million | ▲ +1455.4% |
| 2023 | -0.02x | $-15.43 Million | $632.56 Million | ▲ +40.1% |
| 2022 | -0.04x | $-20.57 Million | $505.46 Million | ▼ -116.2% |
| 2021 | 0.25x | $129.51 Million | $514.37 Million | ▲ +243.6% |
| 2020 | -0.18x | $-74.17 Million | $422.97 Million | ▼ -261.1% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | $39.41 Million | $361.94 Million | ▼ -49.2% |
| 2018 | 0.21x | $82.77 Million | $386.10 Million | ▲ +157.0% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $33.02 Million | $395.80 Million | ▲ +85.6% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $13.38 Million | $297.80 Million | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | $13.85 Million | $292.28 Million | ▲ +265.6% |
| 2014 | -0.03x | $-8.22 Million | $287.46 Million | ▼ -113.8% |
| 2013 | 0.21x | $41.27 Million | $199.64 Million | ▲ +304.9% |
| 2012 | -0.10x | $-21.60 Million | $214.06 Million | ▼ -90.2% |
| 2011 | -0.05x | $-9.40 Million | $177.21 Million | ▲ +68.5% |
| 2010 | -0.17x | $-37.02 Million | $220.14 Million | ▼ -250.1% |
| 2009 | 0.11x | $21.21 Million | $189.40 Million | ▲ +104.7% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $11.82 Million | $216.05 Million | ▲ +135.2% |
| 2007 | -0.16x | $-38.20 Million | $245.37 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2006 | -0.16x | $-38.20 Million | $245.37 Million | ▼ -185.6% |
| 2005 | 0.18x | $41.56 Million | $228.64 Million | ▲ +61.2% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $20.59 Million | $182.62 Million | ▼ -46.7% |
| 2003 | 0.21x | $35.79 Million | $169.32 Million | ▲ +195.6% |
| 2002 | 0.07x | $12.35 Million | $172.71 Million | ▲ +49.6% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | $10.47 Million | $218.96 Million | ▼ -25.2% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | $18.43 Million | $288.21 Million | ▲ +184.2% |
| 1999 | -0.08x | $-8.40 Million | $110.60 Million | ▼ -121.9% |
| 1998 | 0.35x | $20.70 Million | $59.70 Million | ▲ +740.8% |
| 1997 | 0.04x | $1.20 Million | $29.10 Million | ▼ -82.7% |
| 1996 | 0.24x | $6.40 Million | $26.90 Million | — |