PrimeEnergy Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
PrimeEnergy Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. PrimeEnergy Corporation (PNRG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.16x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $15.40 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($96.90 Million) in one year. Check PNRG cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of PrimeEnergy Corporation (1985–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of PrimeEnergy Corporation from 1985 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for PrimeEnergy Corporation across 39 annual periods. Check PrimeEnergy Corporation (PNRG) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
PrimeEnergy Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1985–2025)
PrimeEnergy Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1985 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for PrimeEnergy Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see PrimeEnergy Corporation operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.89x | $96.73 Million | $108.21 Million | ▼ -6.1% |
| 2024 | 0.95x | $115.91 Million | $121.70 Million | ▲ +11.5% |
| 2023 | 0.85x | $109.02 Million | $127.62 Million | ▲ +175.4% |
| 2022 | 0.31x | $33.13 Million | $106.78 Million | ▲ +21.2% |
| 2021 | 0.26x | $28.62 Million | $111.82 Million | ▲ +60.1% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $16.38 Million | $102.49 Million | ▼ -26.0% |
| 2019 | 0.22x | $27.21 Million | $126.00 Million | ▼ -17.6% |
| 2018 | 0.26x | $39.07 Million | $149.05 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2017 | 0.28x | $40.11 Million | $144.33 Million | ▲ +275.7% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $11.01 Million | $148.77 Million | ▼ -42.9% |
| 2015 | 0.13x | $21.21 Million | $163.89 Million | ▼ -57.0% |
| 2014 | 0.30x | $56.16 Million | $186.64 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 2013 | 0.19x | $35.70 Million | $189.78 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2012 | 0.22x | $39.71 Million | $183.88 Million | ▼ -22.1% |
| 2011 | 0.28x | $41.34 Million | $149.06 Million | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2010 | 0.36x | $62.21 Million | $175.07 Million | ▲ +91.7% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $34.06 Million | $183.73 Million | ▼ -54.0% |
| 2008 | 0.40x | $83.74 Million | $207.90 Million | ▲ +11.7% |
| 2007 | 0.36x | $88.17 Million | $244.48 Million | ▲ +165.6% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $31.98 Million | $235.58 Million | ▼ -49.2% |
| 2005 | 0.27x | $18.61 Million | $69.65 Million | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2004 | 0.52x | $27.00 Million | $51.69 Million | ▲ +19.3% |
| 2003 | 0.44x | $19.62 Million | $44.82 Million | ▲ +65.9% |
| 2002 | 0.26x | $9.64 Million | $36.53 Million | ▼ -39.0% |
| 2001 | 0.43x | $12.31 Million | $28.45 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2000 | 0.38x | $11.50 Million | $30.12 Million | ▲ +46.9% |
| 1999 | 0.26x | $7.68 Million | $29.54 Million | ▲ +24.9% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $5.20 Million | $25.00 Million | ▼ -33.6% |
| 1997 | 0.31x | $8.80 Million | $28.10 Million | ▲ +21.6% |
| 1996 | 0.26x | $6.80 Million | $26.40 Million | ▲ +0.1% |
| 1995 | 0.26x | $3.50 Million | $13.60 Million | ▲ +118.0% |
| 1994 | 0.12x | $1.70 Million | $14.40 Million | ▼ -63.2% |
| 1993 | 0.32x | $4.20 Million | $13.10 Million | ▼ -32.6% |
| 1992 | 0.48x | $4.90 Million | $10.30 Million | ▲ +433.0% |
| 1991 | -0.14x | $-1.70 Million | $11.90 Million | ▼ -174.6% |
| 1990 | 0.19x | $1.80 Million | $9.40 Million | ▲ +51.3% |
| 1989 | 0.13x | $1.00 Million | $7.90 Million | ▲ +129.2% |
| 1986 | -0.43x | $-1.30 Million | $3.00 Million | ▼ -116.7% |
| 1985 | -0.20x | $-600.00K | $3.00 Million | — |