PrimeEnergy Corporation (PNRG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
PrimeEnergy Corporation (PNRG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $12.19 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($108.21 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of PrimeEnergy Corporation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
PrimeEnergy Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1985–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for PrimeEnergy Corporation across 39 annual periods. Also explore PrimeEnergy Corporation (PNRG) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for PrimeEnergy Corporation (1985–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for PrimeEnergy Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of PrimeEnergy Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.89x | $96.73 Million | $108.21 Million | ▼ -6.1% |
| 2024 | 0.95x | $115.91 Million | $121.70 Million | ▲ +11.5% |
| 2023 | 0.85x | $109.02 Million | $127.62 Million | ▲ +175.4% |
| 2022 | 0.31x | $33.13 Million | $106.78 Million | ▲ +21.2% |
| 2021 | 0.26x | $28.62 Million | $111.82 Million | ▲ +60.1% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $16.38 Million | $102.49 Million | ▼ -26.0% |
| 2019 | 0.22x | $27.21 Million | $126.00 Million | ▼ -17.6% |
| 2018 | 0.26x | $39.07 Million | $149.05 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2017 | 0.28x | $40.11 Million | $144.33 Million | ▲ +275.7% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $11.01 Million | $148.77 Million | ▼ -42.9% |
| 2015 | 0.13x | $21.21 Million | $163.89 Million | ▼ -57.0% |
| 2014 | 0.30x | $56.16 Million | $186.64 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 2013 | 0.19x | $35.70 Million | $189.78 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2012 | 0.22x | $39.71 Million | $183.88 Million | ▼ -22.1% |
| 2011 | 0.28x | $41.34 Million | $149.06 Million | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2010 | 0.36x | $62.21 Million | $175.07 Million | ▲ +91.7% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $34.06 Million | $183.73 Million | ▼ -54.0% |
| 2008 | 0.40x | $83.74 Million | $207.90 Million | ▲ +11.7% |
| 2007 | 0.36x | $88.17 Million | $244.48 Million | ▲ +165.6% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $31.98 Million | $235.58 Million | ▼ -49.2% |
| 2005 | 0.27x | $18.61 Million | $69.65 Million | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2004 | 0.52x | $27.00 Million | $51.69 Million | ▲ +19.3% |
| 2003 | 0.44x | $19.62 Million | $44.82 Million | ▲ +65.9% |
| 2002 | 0.26x | $9.64 Million | $36.53 Million | ▼ -39.0% |
| 2001 | 0.43x | $12.31 Million | $28.45 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2000 | 0.38x | $11.50 Million | $30.12 Million | ▲ +46.9% |
| 1999 | 0.26x | $7.68 Million | $29.54 Million | ▲ +24.9% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $5.20 Million | $25.00 Million | ▼ -33.6% |
| 1997 | 0.31x | $8.80 Million | $28.10 Million | ▲ +21.6% |
| 1996 | 0.26x | $6.80 Million | $26.40 Million | ▲ +0.1% |
| 1995 | 0.26x | $3.50 Million | $13.60 Million | ▲ +118.0% |
| 1994 | 0.12x | $1.70 Million | $14.40 Million | ▼ -63.2% |
| 1993 | 0.32x | $4.20 Million | $13.10 Million | ▼ -32.6% |
| 1992 | 0.48x | $4.90 Million | $10.30 Million | ▲ +433.0% |
| 1991 | -0.14x | $-1.70 Million | $11.90 Million | ▼ -174.6% |
| 1990 | 0.19x | $1.80 Million | $9.40 Million | ▲ +51.3% |
| 1989 | 0.13x | $1.00 Million | $7.90 Million | ▲ +129.2% |
| 1986 | -0.43x | $-1.30 Million | $3.00 Million | ▼ -116.7% |
| 1985 | -0.20x | $-600.00K | $3.00 Million | — |