Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. Common stock (POCI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. Common stock (POCI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-256.08K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($13.57 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. Commo to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. Common stock Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. Common stock across 34 annual periods. Also explore POCI net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. Common stock (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. Common stock. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. Commo.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.47x | $-3.55 Million | $7.53 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2024 | -0.39x | $-2.68 Million | $6.84 Million | ▼ -3619.1% |
| 2023 | -0.01x | $-81.09K | $7.69 Million | ▲ +91.3% |
| 2022 | -0.12x | $-933.37K | $7.73 Million | ▼ -833.9% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $46.55K | $2.83 Million | ▲ +109.9% |
| 2020 | -0.17x | $-592.49K | $3.58 Million | ▲ +34.0% |
| 2019 | -0.25x | $-1.03 Million | $4.12 Million | ▼ -584.9% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | $100.66K | $1.95 Million | ▲ +109.6% |
| 2017 | -0.54x | $-667.43K | $1.24 Million | ▲ +5.8% |
| 2016 | -0.57x | $-876.30K | $1.54 Million | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2015 | -0.56x | $-773.79K | $1.37 Million | ▲ +30.4% |
| 2014 | -0.81x | $-886.03K | $1.10 Million | ▲ +62.9% |
| 2013 | -2.18x | $-1.29 Million | $592.89K | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2012 | -2.18x | $-1.59 Million | $727.07K | ▼ -1122.1% |
| 2011 | -0.18x | $-413.52K | $2.32 Million | ▼ -814.3% |
| 2010 | 0.02x | $52.28K | $2.09 Million | ▲ +107.0% |
| 2009 | -0.36x | $-532.65K | $1.49 Million | ▲ +55.0% |
| 2008 | -0.79x | $-696.87K | $879.54K | ▲ +82.9% |
| 2007 | -4.64x | $-3.33 Million | $718.39K | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2006 | -3.86x | $-2.27 Million | $588.64K | ▲ +35.9% |
| 2005 | -6.03x | $-3.13 Million | $519.01K | ▼ -16.3% |
| 2004 | -5.18x | $-3.07 Million | $593.34K | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2003 | -5.16x | $-2.77 Million | $535.57K | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2002 | -5.91x | $-4.51 Million | $764.23K | ▼ -93.7% |
| 2001 | -3.05x | $-3.45 Million | $1.13 Million | ▼ -22.4% |
| 2000 | -2.49x | $-2.10 Million | $844.59K | ▼ -81.3% |
| 1999 | -1.38x | $-1.10 Million | $800.00K | ▼ -37.5% |
| 1998 | -1.00x | $-1.00 Million | $1.00 Million | ▼ -400.0% |
| 1997 | 0.33x | $300.00K | $900.00K | ▼ -33.3% |
| 1996 | 0.50x | $800.00K | $1.60 Million | ▼ -37.5% |
| 1995 | 0.80x | $800.00K | $1.00 Million | ▲ +244.0% |
| 1994 | -0.56x | $-500.00K | $900.00K | ▲ +53.7% |
| 1993 | -1.20x | $-1.20 Million | $1.00 Million | ▼ -180.0% |
| 1992 | -0.43x | $-300.00K | $700.00K | — |