Ammo Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Ammo Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Ammo Inc (POWW) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.22 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($34.86 Million) in one year. Check POWW cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Ammo Inc (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Ammo Inc from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Ammo Inc across 26 annual periods. Check Ammo Inc (POWW) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Ammo Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Ammo Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ammo Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Ammo Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.13x | $-10.11 Million | $75.30 Million | ▼ -118.5% |
| 2024 | 0.73x | $32.64 Million | $44.99 Million | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2023 | 0.89x | $35.56 Million | $39.74 Million | ▲ +1150.7% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $2.85 Million | $39.87 Million | ▲ +109.4% |
| 2021 | -0.76x | $-14.42 Million | $19.03 Million | ▼ -208.8% |
| 2020 | -0.25x | $-5.36 Million | $21.85 Million | ▲ +52.7% |
| 2019 | -0.52x | $-7.29 Million | $14.06 Million | ▲ +61.8% |
| 2018 | -1.36x | $-3.28 Million | $2.41 Million | ▼ -4194.2% |
| 2017 | -0.03x | $-19.79K | $625.58K | ▼ -563.7% |
| 2016 | 0.00x | $-1.52K | $318.81K | ▲ +67.1% |
| 2015 | -0.01x | $-4.35K | $300.30K | ▲ +73.3% |
| 2014 | -0.05x | $-15.37K | $282.74K | ▲ +11.7% |
| 2013 | -0.06x | $-16.02K | $260.16K | ▲ +7.2% |
| 2012 | -0.07x | $-15.20K | $228.86K | ▲ +19.3% |
| 2011 | -0.08x | $-16.67K | $202.62K | ▲ +28.6% |
| 2010 | -0.12x | $-19.45K | $168.76K | ▲ +34.3% |
| 2009 | -0.18x | $-24.46K | $139.30K | ▲ +78.0% |
| 2008 | -0.80x | $-82.48K | $103.52K | ▼ -966.9% |
| 2007 | -0.07x | $-15.56K | $208.32K | ▼ -1691.6% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | $23.02K | $4.91 Million | ▲ +102.8% |
| 2000 | -0.17x | $-884.45K | $5.28 Million | ▲ +74.9% |
| 1999 | -0.67x | $-2.62 Million | $3.92 Million | ▲ +56.4% |
| 1998 | -1.53x | $-5.31 Million | $3.47 Million | ▼ -7289.2% |
| 1997 | 0.02x | $100.00K | $4.70 Million | ▲ +119.8% |
| 1996 | -0.11x | $-370.00K | $3.44 Million | ▼ -130.0% |
| 1995 | -0.05x | $-130.00K | $2.78 Million | — |