ProPhase Labs Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
ProPhase Labs Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. ProPhase Labs Inc (PRPH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-78.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($60.52 Million) in one year. Check PRPH cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of ProPhase Labs Inc (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of ProPhase Labs Inc from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for ProPhase Labs Inc across 30 annual periods. Check PRPH cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
ProPhase Labs Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
ProPhase Labs Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for ProPhase Labs Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see PRPH cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.15x | $-8.34 Million | $56.36 Million | ▲ +52.9% |
| 2024 | -0.31x | $-17.54 Million | $55.85 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2023 | -0.27x | $-11.35 Million | $42.54 Million | ▼ -122.4% |
| 2022 | 1.19x | $28.55 Million | $24.02 Million | ▲ +367.7% |
| 2021 | -0.44x | $-13.62 Million | $30.67 Million | ▼ -257.2% |
| 2020 | -0.12x | $-2.59 Million | $20.85 Million | ▲ +84.6% |
| 2019 | -0.81x | $-841.00K | $1.04 Million | ▼ -61.1% |
| 2018 | -0.50x | $-2.12 Million | $4.23 Million | ▲ +81.1% |
| 2017 | -2.65x | $-2.84 Million | $1.07 Million | ▼ -3736.5% |
| 2016 | -0.07x | $-472.00K | $6.84 Million | ▲ +88.2% |
| 2015 | -0.58x | $-3.50 Million | $6.00 Million | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2014 | -0.60x | $-3.22 Million | $5.34 Million | ▼ -355.5% |
| 2013 | 0.24x | $1.14 Million | $4.82 Million | ▲ +121.4% |
| 2012 | -1.10x | $-5.73 Million | $5.21 Million | ▼ -309.6% |
| 2011 | -0.27x | $-2.11 Million | $7.85 Million | ▲ +37.7% |
| 2010 | -0.43x | $-3.55 Million | $8.23 Million | ▼ -657.6% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | $445.00K | $5.76 Million | ▲ +116.7% |
| 2008 | -0.46x | $-3.06 Million | $6.59 Million | ▼ -254.1% |
| 2007 | -0.13x | $-1.31 Million | $10.02 Million | ▼ -226.6% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | $956.94K | $9.25 Million | ▼ -74.3% |
| 2005 | 0.40x | $4.27 Million | $10.60 Million | ▼ -17.3% |
| 2004 | 0.49x | $4.66 Million | $9.57 Million | ▲ +376.2% |
| 2003 | -0.18x | $-966.23K | $5.48 Million | ▼ -311.1% |
| 2002 | 0.08x | $543.64K | $6.51 Million | ▲ +126.6% |
| 2001 | -0.31x | $-1.12 Million | $3.56 Million | ▲ +18.6% |
| 2000 | -0.39x | $-1.87 Million | $4.85 Million | ▼ -310.7% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $1.30 Million | $7.10 Million | ▼ -91.8% |
| 1998 | 2.23x | $8.90 Million | $4.00 Million | ▲ +100.3% |
| 1997 | 1.11x | $9.00 Million | $8.10 Million | ▲ +120.2% |
| 1996 | -5.50x | $-1.10 Million | $200.00K | — |