ProPhase Labs Inc (PRPH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
ProPhase Labs Inc (PRPH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.37x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-21.52 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($58.84 Million) in one year. Explore PRPH long-term asset investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
ProPhase Labs Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for ProPhase Labs Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore ProPhase Labs Inc total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for ProPhase Labs Inc (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for ProPhase Labs Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see PRPH company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.31x | $-17.54 Million | $55.85 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2023 | -0.27x | $-11.35 Million | $42.54 Million | ▼ -122.4% |
| 2022 | 1.19x | $28.55 Million | $24.02 Million | ▲ +367.7% |
| 2021 | -0.44x | $-13.62 Million | $30.67 Million | ▼ -257.2% |
| 2020 | -0.12x | $-2.59 Million | $20.85 Million | ▲ +84.6% |
| 2019 | -0.81x | $-841.00K | $1.04 Million | ▼ -61.1% |
| 2018 | -0.50x | $-2.12 Million | $4.23 Million | ▲ +81.1% |
| 2017 | -2.65x | $-2.84 Million | $1.07 Million | ▼ -3736.5% |
| 2016 | -0.07x | $-472.00K | $6.84 Million | ▲ +88.2% |
| 2015 | -0.58x | $-3.50 Million | $6.00 Million | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2014 | -0.60x | $-3.22 Million | $5.34 Million | ▼ -355.5% |
| 2013 | 0.24x | $1.14 Million | $4.82 Million | ▲ +121.4% |
| 2012 | -1.10x | $-5.73 Million | $5.21 Million | ▼ -309.6% |
| 2011 | -0.27x | $-2.11 Million | $7.85 Million | ▲ +37.7% |
| 2010 | -0.43x | $-3.55 Million | $8.23 Million | ▼ -657.6% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | $445.00K | $5.76 Million | ▲ +116.7% |
| 2008 | -0.46x | $-3.06 Million | $6.59 Million | ▼ -254.1% |
| 2007 | -0.13x | $-1.31 Million | $10.02 Million | ▼ -226.6% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | $956.94K | $9.25 Million | ▼ -74.3% |
| 2005 | 0.40x | $4.27 Million | $10.60 Million | ▼ -17.3% |
| 2004 | 0.49x | $4.66 Million | $9.57 Million | ▲ +376.2% |
| 2003 | -0.18x | $-966.23K | $5.48 Million | ▼ -311.1% |
| 2002 | 0.08x | $543.64K | $6.51 Million | ▲ +126.6% |
| 2001 | -0.31x | $-1.12 Million | $3.56 Million | ▲ +18.6% |
| 2000 | -0.39x | $-1.87 Million | $4.85 Million | ▼ -310.7% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $1.30 Million | $7.10 Million | ▼ -91.8% |
| 1998 | 2.23x | $8.90 Million | $4.00 Million | ▲ +100.3% |
| 1997 | 1.11x | $9.00 Million | $8.10 Million | ▲ +120.2% |
| 1996 | -5.50x | $-1.10 Million | $200.00K | — |