Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (PTN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (PTN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.68x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.42 Million could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities ($2.63 Million) in one year. Check PTN cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock across 30 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see PTN stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.65x | $-21.31 Million | $8.04 Million | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2024 | -2.90x | $-31.46 Million | $10.85 Million | ▼ -103.2% |
| 2023 | -1.43x | $-28.42 Million | $19.92 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2022 | -1.51x | $-29.92 Million | $19.80 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2021 | -1.28x | $-22.65 Million | $17.65 Million | ▼ -115.2% |
| 2020 | 8.47x | $41.33 Million | $4.88 Million | ▲ +262.7% |
| 2019 | -5.20x | $-21.78 Million | $4.19 Million | ▼ -3782.5% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | $1.70 Million | $12.05 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | $12.88 Million | $62.00 Million | ▲ +112.6% |
| 2016 | -1.65x | $-47.36 Million | $28.64 Million | ▼ -113.8% |
| 2015 | -0.77x | $-13.36 Million | $17.27 Million | ▲ +82.4% |
| 2014 | -4.41x | $-12.21 Million | $2.77 Million | ▲ +32.3% |
| 2013 | -6.51x | $-13.65 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -49.3% |
| 2012 | -4.36x | $-15.49 Million | $3.55 Million | ▼ -17.9% |
| 2011 | -3.70x | $-11.03 Million | $2.98 Million | ▼ -98.3% |
| 2010 | -1.87x | $-5.73 Million | $3.07 Million | ▼ -238.9% |
| 2009 | -0.55x | $-5.44 Million | $9.89 Million | ▲ +66.4% |
| 2008 | -1.64x | $-20.58 Million | $12.57 Million | ▼ -80.0% |
| 2007 | -0.91x | $-22.05 Million | $24.25 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2006 | -1.08x | $-23.45 Million | $21.75 Million | ▼ -452.4% |
| 2005 | -0.20x | $-5.06 Million | $25.94 Million | ▲ +95.9% |
| 2004 | -4.76x | $-23.74 Million | $4.99 Million | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2003 | -4.89x | $-19.89 Million | $4.06 Million | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2002 | -3.58x | $-13.15 Million | $3.67 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2001 | -3.61x | $-8.40 Million | $2.33 Million | ▲ +16.4% |
| 2000 | -4.31x | $-8.54 Million | $1.98 Million | ▼ -82.5% |
| 1999 | -2.36x | $-10.40 Million | $4.40 Million | ▲ +1.0% |
| 1998 | -2.39x | $-7.40 Million | $3.10 Million | ▼ -150.4% |
| 1997 | -0.95x | $-4.10 Million | $4.30 Million | ▼ -47.9% |
| 1996 | -0.64x | $-2.71 Million | $4.20 Million | — |