Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (PTN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (PTN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.68x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.42 Million could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities ($2.63 Million) in one year. See Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock free cash flow to debt ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock. Check how high is Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.65x | $-21.31 Million | $8.04 Million | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2024 | -2.90x | $-31.46 Million | $10.85 Million | ▼ -103.2% |
| 2023 | -1.43x | $-28.42 Million | $19.92 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2022 | -1.51x | $-29.92 Million | $19.80 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2021 | -1.28x | $-22.65 Million | $17.65 Million | ▼ -115.2% |
| 2020 | 8.47x | $41.33 Million | $4.88 Million | ▲ +262.7% |
| 2019 | -5.20x | $-21.78 Million | $4.19 Million | ▼ -3782.5% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | $1.70 Million | $12.05 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | $12.88 Million | $62.00 Million | ▲ +112.6% |
| 2016 | -1.65x | $-47.36 Million | $28.64 Million | ▼ -113.8% |
| 2015 | -0.77x | $-13.36 Million | $17.27 Million | ▲ +82.4% |
| 2014 | -4.41x | $-12.21 Million | $2.77 Million | ▲ +32.3% |
| 2013 | -6.51x | $-13.65 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -49.3% |
| 2012 | -4.36x | $-15.49 Million | $3.55 Million | ▼ -17.9% |
| 2011 | -3.70x | $-11.03 Million | $2.98 Million | ▼ -98.3% |
| 2010 | -1.87x | $-5.73 Million | $3.07 Million | ▼ -238.9% |
| 2009 | -0.55x | $-5.44 Million | $9.89 Million | ▲ +66.4% |
| 2008 | -1.64x | $-20.58 Million | $12.57 Million | ▼ -80.0% |
| 2007 | -0.91x | $-22.05 Million | $24.25 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2006 | -1.08x | $-23.45 Million | $21.75 Million | ▼ -452.4% |
| 2005 | -0.20x | $-5.06 Million | $25.94 Million | ▲ +95.9% |
| 2004 | -4.76x | $-23.74 Million | $4.99 Million | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2003 | -4.89x | $-19.89 Million | $4.06 Million | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2002 | -3.58x | $-13.15 Million | $3.67 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2001 | -3.61x | $-8.40 Million | $2.33 Million | ▲ +16.4% |
| 2000 | -4.31x | $-8.54 Million | $1.98 Million | ▼ -82.5% |
| 1999 | -2.36x | $-10.40 Million | $4.40 Million | ▲ +1.0% |
| 1998 | -2.39x | $-7.40 Million | $3.10 Million | ▼ -150.4% |
| 1997 | -0.95x | $-4.10 Million | $4.30 Million | ▼ -47.9% |
| 1996 | -0.64x | $-2.71 Million | $4.20 Million | — |