Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock cash flow-to-debt ratio. Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (PTN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.68x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.42 Million could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities ($2.63 Million) in one year. Check Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock across 30 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (PTN) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.65x | $-21.31 Million | $8.04 Million | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2024 | -2.90x | $-31.46 Million | $10.85 Million | ▼ -103.2% |
| 2023 | -1.43x | $-28.42 Million | $19.92 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2022 | -1.51x | $-29.92 Million | $19.80 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2021 | -1.28x | $-22.65 Million | $17.65 Million | ▼ -115.2% |
| 2020 | 8.47x | $41.33 Million | $4.88 Million | ▲ +262.7% |
| 2019 | -5.20x | $-21.78 Million | $4.19 Million | ▼ -3782.5% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | $1.70 Million | $12.05 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | $12.88 Million | $62.00 Million | ▲ +112.6% |
| 2016 | -1.65x | $-47.36 Million | $28.64 Million | ▼ -113.8% |
| 2015 | -0.77x | $-13.36 Million | $17.27 Million | ▲ +82.4% |
| 2014 | -4.41x | $-12.21 Million | $2.77 Million | ▲ +32.3% |
| 2013 | -6.51x | $-13.65 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -49.3% |
| 2012 | -4.36x | $-15.49 Million | $3.55 Million | ▼ -17.9% |
| 2011 | -3.70x | $-11.03 Million | $2.98 Million | ▼ -98.3% |
| 2010 | -1.87x | $-5.73 Million | $3.07 Million | ▼ -238.9% |
| 2009 | -0.55x | $-5.44 Million | $9.89 Million | ▲ +66.4% |
| 2008 | -1.64x | $-20.58 Million | $12.57 Million | ▼ -80.0% |
| 2007 | -0.91x | $-22.05 Million | $24.25 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2006 | -1.08x | $-23.45 Million | $21.75 Million | ▼ -452.4% |
| 2005 | -0.20x | $-5.06 Million | $25.94 Million | ▲ +95.9% |
| 2004 | -4.76x | $-23.74 Million | $4.99 Million | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2003 | -4.89x | $-19.89 Million | $4.06 Million | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2002 | -3.58x | $-13.15 Million | $3.67 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2001 | -3.61x | $-8.40 Million | $2.33 Million | ▲ +16.4% |
| 2000 | -4.31x | $-8.54 Million | $1.98 Million | ▼ -82.5% |
| 1999 | -2.36x | $-10.40 Million | $4.40 Million | ▲ +1.0% |
| 1998 | -2.39x | $-7.40 Million | $3.10 Million | ▼ -150.4% |
| 1997 | -0.95x | $-4.10 Million | $4.30 Million | ▼ -47.9% |
| 1996 | -0.64x | $-2.71 Million | $4.20 Million | — |