Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock working capital to net assets ratio. Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (PTN) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 96.8% as of March 2026. Working capital of $10.25 Million (current assets of $12.79 Million minus current liabilities of $2.54 Million) is measured against net assets of $10.59 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check PTN tangible net worth ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (1996–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock from 1996 to 2025. This chart shows how Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 30 annual periods from 1996 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 96.8%, reflecting working capital of $10.25 Million against net assets of $10.59 Million USD. See how many days can Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock fund operations to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock working capital to net assets ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock from 1996 to 2025, covering 30 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see Palatin Technologies, Inc. Common Stock assets under control.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 106.6% | $-5.09 Million | $-4.78 Million | $2.92 Million | $8.01 Million | ▲ +207.0 pp |
| 2024 | -100.4% | $111.99K | $-111.50K | $9.77 Million | $9.66 Million | ▼ -40.4 pp |
| 2023 | -60.1% | $1.19 Million | $-1.98 Million | $16.32 Million | $15.13 Million | ▼ -172.8 pp |
| 2022 | 112.7% | $18.34 Million | $16.27 Million | $34.60 Million | $16.26 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2021 | 111.6% | $55.40 Million | $49.65 Million | $65.91 Million | $10.51 Million | ▲ +12.2 pp |
| 2020 | 99.4% | $79.66 Million | $80.17 Million | $83.59 Million | $3.93 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2019 | 99.7% | $100.23 Million | $100.55 Million | $104.41 Million | $4.19 Million | ▼ -3.2 pp |
| 2018 | 102.9% | $27.75 Million | $26.96 Million | $38.51 Million | $10.76 Million | ▲ +134.2 pp |
| 2017 | -31.3% | $1.62 Million | $-5.16 Million | $56.58 Million | $54.96 Million | ▼ -49.4 pp |
| 2016 | 18.1% | $-3.19 Million | $-17.59 Million | $10.81 Million | $13.99 Million | ▼ -160.8 pp |
| 2015 | 179.0% | $21.84 Million | $12.20 Million | $29.20 Million | $7.36 Million | ▲ +81.2 pp |
| 2014 | 97.8% | $9.57 Million | $9.79 Million | $12.34 Million | $2.77 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2013 | 98.7% | $22.69 Million | $22.98 Million | $24.75 Million | $2.06 Million | ▲ +28.8 pp |
| 2012 | 69.9% | $1.28 Million | $1.83 Million | $4.74 Million | $3.46 Million | ▼ -20.6 pp |
| 2011 | 90.5% | $16.46 Million | $18.19 Million | $19.26 Million | $2.81 Million | ▲ +16.7 pp |
| 2010 | 73.7% | $6.87 Million | $9.32 Million | $9.26 Million | $2.39 Million | ▲ +69.2 pp |
| 2009 | 4.5% | $149.33K | $3.31 Million | $8.82 Million | $8.67 Million | ▼ -121.6 pp |
| 2008 | 126.1% | $8.27 Million | $6.55 Million | $13.26 Million | $5.00 Million | ▼ -13.2 pp |
| 2007 | 139.3% | $25.82 Million | $18.53 Million | $35.39 Million | $9.56 Million | ▲ +31.5 pp |
| 2006 | 107.9% | $19.74 Million | $18.30 Million | $32.19 Million | $12.45 Million | ▼ -41.4 pp |
| 2005 | 149.3% | $13.77 Million | $9.23 Million | $26.82 Million | $13.05 Million | ▲ +67.4 pp |
| 2004 | 81.9% | $15.88 Million | $19.39 Million | $20.84 Million | $4.96 Million | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2003 | 79.6% | $14.84 Million | $18.66 Million | $18.83 Million | $3.99 Million | ▲ +26.3 pp |
| 2002 | 53.2% | $4.62 Million | $8.69 Million | $8.29 Million | $3.67 Million | ▼ -25.3 pp |
| 2001 | 78.6% | $9.36 Million | $11.92 Million | $11.66 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +13.0 pp |
| 2000 | 65.6% | $4.53 Million | $6.91 Million | $6.51 Million | $1.98 Million | ▼ -101.1 pp |
| 1999 | 166.7% | $500.00K | $300.00K | $2.90 Million | $2.40 Million | ▲ +96.1 pp |
| 1998 | 70.6% | $2.40 Million | $3.40 Million | $4.90 Million | $2.50 Million | ▼ -35.5 pp |
| 1997 | 106.1% | $10.40 Million | $9.80 Million | $13.10 Million | $2.70 Million | ▼ -52.5 pp |
| 1996 | 158.7% | $4.50 Million | $2.84 Million | $6.86 Million | $2.36 Million | — |