Pyxis Tankers Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2025: 0.04x

Pyxis Tankers Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Pyxis Tankers Inc (PXSAW) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($88.45 Million) in one year. Check Pyxis Tankers Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.04x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

$3.27 Million
USD

Total Liabilities

$88.45 Million
USD

Data as of

Jun 2025
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Pyxis Tankers Inc (2012–2024)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Pyxis Tankers Inc from 2012 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Pyxis Tankers Inc across 13 annual periods. Check Pyxis Tankers Inc (PXSAW) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

Pyxis Tankers Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2012–2024)

Pyxis Tankers Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2012 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Pyxis Tankers Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Pyxis Tankers Inc generate cash.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (USD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.21x $18.85 Million $89.22 Million ▼ -35.5%
2023 0.33x $21.44 Million $65.45 Million ▲ +207.3%
2022 0.11x $8.27 Million $77.61 Million ▲ +1215.0%
2021 -0.01x $-896.00K $93.71 Million ▲ +95.3%
2020 -0.20x $-13.03 Million $63.63 Million ▼ -377.7%
2019 0.07x $5.66 Million $76.77 Million ▲ +356.6%
2018 -0.03x $-2.20 Million $76.67 Million ▼ -159.9%
2017 0.05x $3.68 Million $76.66 Million ▼ -11.5%
2016 0.05x $4.45 Million $81.99 Million ▼ -61.9%
2015 0.14x $12.40 Million $87.20 Million ▲ +88.3%
2014 0.08x $5.36 Million $71.00 Million ▲ +12.8%
2013 0.07x $5.99 Million $89.53 Million ▼ -17.3%
2012 0.08x $5.64 Million $69.69 Million —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.