QuickLogic Corporation (QUIK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
QuickLogic Corporation (QUIK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $721.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.14 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is QuickLogic Corporation to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
QuickLogic Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for QuickLogic Corporation across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see QuickLogic Corporation (QUIK) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for QuickLogic Corporation (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for QuickLogic Corporation. Check QUIK cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.15x | $-3.26 Million | $22.34 Million | ▼ -14728.5% |
| 2024 | 0.00x | $27.00K | $27.05 Million | ▼ -99.4% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $4.85 Million | $30.90 Million | ▲ +180.0% |
| 2022 | -0.20x | $-4.06 Million | $20.69 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2021 | -0.14x | $-2.86 Million | $19.76 Million | ▲ +56.2% |
| 2020 | -0.33x | $-6.74 Million | $20.40 Million | ▲ +44.2% |
| 2019 | -0.59x | $-11.59 Million | $19.58 Million | ▲ +11.8% |
| 2018 | -0.67x | $-12.64 Million | $18.83 Million | ▲ +49.4% |
| 2017 | -1.33x | $-12.94 Million | $9.76 Million | ▲ +14.4% |
| 2016 | -1.55x | $-15.26 Million | $9.86 Million | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2015 | -1.45x | $-11.83 Million | $8.14 Million | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2014 | -1.93x | $-10.75 Million | $5.57 Million | ▼ -81.7% |
| 2013 | -1.06x | $-9.06 Million | $8.53 Million | ▲ +54.1% |
| 2012 | -2.31x | $-8.66 Million | $3.75 Million | ▼ -273.1% |
| 2011 | -0.62x | $-2.50 Million | $4.03 Million | ▼ -1719.6% |
| 2010 | -0.03x | $-147.00K | $4.32 Million | ▲ +96.2% |
| 2009 | -0.90x | $-5.69 Million | $6.34 Million | ▼ -634.7% |
| 2008 | 0.17x | $1.10 Million | $6.56 Million | ▲ +176.8% |
| 2007 | -0.22x | $-2.71 Million | $12.41 Million | ▲ +32.1% |
| 2006 | -0.32x | $-4.14 Million | $12.87 Million | ▼ -172.3% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | $5.67 Million | $12.76 Million | ▲ +1501.4% |
| 2004 | 0.03x | $410.00K | $14.78 Million | ▼ -91.7% |
| 2003 | 0.33x | $4.82 Million | $14.49 Million | ▲ +166.1% |
| 2002 | -0.50x | $-8.65 Million | $17.20 Million | ▲ +75.9% |
| 2001 | -2.09x | $-20.56 Million | $9.84 Million | ▼ -806.5% |
| 2000 | 0.30x | $4.31 Million | $14.57 Million | ▲ +226.3% |
| 1999 | -0.23x | $-3.16 Million | $13.48 Million | ▼ -275.2% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | $2.30 Million | $17.20 Million | — |