QuickLogic Corporation (QUIK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
QuickLogic Corporation (QUIK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.08x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.90 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($22.34 Million) in one year. See QUIK free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
QuickLogic Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for QuickLogic Corporation across 28 annual periods. Also explore QuickLogic Corporation (QUIK) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for QuickLogic Corporation (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for QuickLogic Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see QUIK market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.15x | $-3.26 Million | $22.34 Million | ▼ -14728.5% |
| 2024 | 0.00x | $27.00K | $27.05 Million | ▼ -99.4% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $4.85 Million | $30.90 Million | ▲ +180.0% |
| 2022 | -0.20x | $-4.06 Million | $20.69 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2021 | -0.14x | $-2.86 Million | $19.76 Million | ▲ +56.2% |
| 2020 | -0.33x | $-6.74 Million | $20.40 Million | ▲ +44.2% |
| 2019 | -0.59x | $-11.59 Million | $19.58 Million | ▲ +11.8% |
| 2018 | -0.67x | $-12.64 Million | $18.83 Million | ▲ +49.4% |
| 2017 | -1.33x | $-12.94 Million | $9.76 Million | ▲ +14.4% |
| 2016 | -1.55x | $-15.26 Million | $9.86 Million | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2015 | -1.45x | $-11.83 Million | $8.14 Million | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2014 | -1.93x | $-10.75 Million | $5.57 Million | ▼ -81.7% |
| 2013 | -1.06x | $-9.06 Million | $8.53 Million | ▲ +54.1% |
| 2012 | -2.31x | $-8.66 Million | $3.75 Million | ▼ -273.1% |
| 2011 | -0.62x | $-2.50 Million | $4.03 Million | ▼ -1719.6% |
| 2010 | -0.03x | $-147.00K | $4.32 Million | ▲ +96.2% |
| 2009 | -0.90x | $-5.69 Million | $6.34 Million | ▼ -634.7% |
| 2008 | 0.17x | $1.10 Million | $6.56 Million | ▲ +176.8% |
| 2007 | -0.22x | $-2.71 Million | $12.41 Million | ▲ +32.1% |
| 2006 | -0.32x | $-4.14 Million | $12.87 Million | ▼ -172.3% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | $5.67 Million | $12.76 Million | ▲ +1501.4% |
| 2004 | 0.03x | $410.00K | $14.78 Million | ▼ -91.7% |
| 2003 | 0.33x | $4.82 Million | $14.49 Million | ▲ +166.1% |
| 2002 | -0.50x | $-8.65 Million | $17.20 Million | ▲ +75.9% |
| 2001 | -2.09x | $-20.56 Million | $9.84 Million | ▼ -806.5% |
| 2000 | 0.30x | $4.31 Million | $14.57 Million | ▲ +226.3% |
| 1999 | -0.23x | $-3.16 Million | $13.48 Million | ▼ -275.2% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | $2.30 Million | $17.20 Million | — |