QuickLogic Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
QuickLogic Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. QuickLogic Corporation (QUIK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.13x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.47 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($11.72 Million) in one year. Check QuickLogic Corporation investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of QuickLogic Corporation (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of QuickLogic Corporation from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for QuickLogic Corporation across 28 annual periods. Check QUIK cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
QuickLogic Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
QuickLogic Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for QuickLogic Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see QUIK cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.15x | $-3.26 Million | $22.34 Million | ▼ -14728.5% |
| 2024 | 0.00x | $27.00K | $27.05 Million | ▼ -99.4% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $4.85 Million | $30.90 Million | ▲ +180.0% |
| 2022 | -0.20x | $-4.06 Million | $20.69 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2021 | -0.14x | $-2.86 Million | $19.76 Million | ▲ +56.2% |
| 2020 | -0.33x | $-6.74 Million | $20.40 Million | ▲ +44.2% |
| 2019 | -0.59x | $-11.59 Million | $19.58 Million | ▲ +11.8% |
| 2018 | -0.67x | $-12.64 Million | $18.83 Million | ▲ +49.4% |
| 2017 | -1.33x | $-12.94 Million | $9.76 Million | ▲ +14.4% |
| 2016 | -1.55x | $-15.26 Million | $9.86 Million | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2015 | -1.45x | $-11.83 Million | $8.14 Million | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2014 | -1.93x | $-10.75 Million | $5.57 Million | ▼ -81.7% |
| 2013 | -1.06x | $-9.06 Million | $8.53 Million | ▲ +54.1% |
| 2012 | -2.31x | $-8.66 Million | $3.75 Million | ▼ -273.1% |
| 2011 | -0.62x | $-2.50 Million | $4.03 Million | ▼ -1719.6% |
| 2010 | -0.03x | $-147.00K | $4.32 Million | ▲ +96.2% |
| 2009 | -0.90x | $-5.69 Million | $6.34 Million | ▼ -634.7% |
| 2008 | 0.17x | $1.10 Million | $6.56 Million | ▲ +176.8% |
| 2007 | -0.22x | $-2.71 Million | $12.41 Million | ▲ +32.1% |
| 2006 | -0.32x | $-4.14 Million | $12.87 Million | ▼ -172.3% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | $5.67 Million | $12.76 Million | ▲ +1501.4% |
| 2004 | 0.03x | $410.00K | $14.78 Million | ▼ -91.7% |
| 2003 | 0.33x | $4.82 Million | $14.49 Million | ▲ +166.1% |
| 2002 | -0.50x | $-8.65 Million | $17.20 Million | ▲ +75.9% |
| 2001 | -2.09x | $-20.56 Million | $9.84 Million | ▼ -806.5% |
| 2000 | 0.30x | $4.31 Million | $14.57 Million | ▲ +226.3% |
| 1999 | -0.23x | $-3.16 Million | $13.48 Million | ▼ -275.2% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | $2.30 Million | $17.20 Million | — |