Rave Restaurant Group Inc (RAVE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Rave Restaurant Group Inc (RAVE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.53x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.14 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($2.13 Million) in one year. See Rave Restaurant Group Inc free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Rave Restaurant Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Rave Restaurant Group Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore Rave Restaurant Group Inc (RAVE) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Rave Restaurant Group Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Rave Restaurant Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see RAVE company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.41x | $3.40 Million | $2.40 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2024 | 0.88x | $2.74 Million | $3.12 Million | ▲ +28.6% |
| 2023 | 0.68x | $2.63 Million | $3.85 Million | ▲ +152.1% |
| 2022 | 0.27x | $1.38 Million | $5.10 Million | ▲ +39.0% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | $1.49 Million | $7.61 Million | ▲ +598.7% |
| 2020 | -0.04x | $-360.00K | $9.20 Million | ▼ -135.6% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | $659.00K | $5.99 Million | ▲ +113.2% |
| 2018 | -0.83x | $-3.90 Million | $4.69 Million | ▼ -74.4% |
| 2017 | -0.48x | $-5.55 Million | $11.62 Million | ▼ -323.2% |
| 2016 | 0.21x | $1.95 Million | $9.10 Million | ▼ -26.9% |
| 2015 | 0.29x | $1.98 Million | $6.76 Million | ▲ +2332.5% |
| 2014 | -0.01x | $-75.00K | $5.73 Million | ▼ -111.5% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | $734.00K | $6.47 Million | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2012 | 0.19x | $1.17 Million | $6.19 Million | ▼ -35.9% |
| 2011 | 0.30x | $1.57 Million | $5.31 Million | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2010 | 0.38x | $1.55 Million | $4.08 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2009 | 0.38x | $1.52 Million | $4.01 Million | ▼ -34.6% |
| 2008 | 0.58x | $2.42 Million | $4.18 Million | ▲ +286.4% |
| 2007 | -0.31x | $-1.37 Million | $4.42 Million | ▼ -489.3% |
| 2006 | 0.08x | $1.24 Million | $15.49 Million | ▼ -16.8% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | $1.09 Million | $11.35 Million | ▼ -66.7% |
| 2004 | 0.29x | $3.51 Million | $12.19 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 2003 | 0.26x | $4.02 Million | $15.39 Million | ▲ +1.9% |
| 2002 | 0.26x | $5.56 Million | $21.68 Million | ▼ -24.1% |
| 2001 | 0.34x | $6.42 Million | $19.01 Million | ▲ +26.9% |
| 2000 | 0.27x | $4.58 Million | $17.20 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 1999 | 0.46x | $5.80 Million | $12.50 Million | ▼ -21.0% |
| 1998 | 0.59x | $6.40 Million | $10.90 Million | ▲ +42.4% |
| 1997 | 0.41x | $5.40 Million | $13.10 Million | ▲ +8.4% |
| 1996 | 0.38x | $6.20 Million | $16.30 Million | ▲ +150.0% |
| 1995 | 0.15x | $2.80 Million | $18.40 Million | ▲ +24.6% |
| 1994 | 0.12x | $2.70 Million | $22.10 Million | ▼ -38.2% |
| 1993 | 0.20x | $4.90 Million | $24.80 Million | — |