Rave Restaurant Group Inc (RAVE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Rave Restaurant Group Inc (RAVE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.53x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.14 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($2.13 Million) in one year. Explore Rave Restaurant Group Inc long-term investment allocation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Rave Restaurant Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Rave Restaurant Group Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore Rave Restaurant Group Inc asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Rave Restaurant Group Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Rave Restaurant Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Rave Restaurant Group Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.41x | $3.40 Million | $2.40 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2024 | 0.88x | $2.74 Million | $3.12 Million | ▲ +28.6% |
| 2023 | 0.68x | $2.63 Million | $3.85 Million | ▲ +152.1% |
| 2022 | 0.27x | $1.38 Million | $5.10 Million | ▲ +39.0% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | $1.49 Million | $7.61 Million | ▲ +598.7% |
| 2020 | -0.04x | $-360.00K | $9.20 Million | ▼ -135.6% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | $659.00K | $5.99 Million | ▲ +113.2% |
| 2018 | -0.83x | $-3.90 Million | $4.69 Million | ▼ -74.4% |
| 2017 | -0.48x | $-5.55 Million | $11.62 Million | ▼ -323.2% |
| 2016 | 0.21x | $1.95 Million | $9.10 Million | ▼ -26.9% |
| 2015 | 0.29x | $1.98 Million | $6.76 Million | ▲ +2332.5% |
| 2014 | -0.01x | $-75.00K | $5.73 Million | ▼ -111.5% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | $734.00K | $6.47 Million | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2012 | 0.19x | $1.17 Million | $6.19 Million | ▼ -35.9% |
| 2011 | 0.30x | $1.57 Million | $5.31 Million | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2010 | 0.38x | $1.55 Million | $4.08 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2009 | 0.38x | $1.52 Million | $4.01 Million | ▼ -34.6% |
| 2008 | 0.58x | $2.42 Million | $4.18 Million | ▲ +286.4% |
| 2007 | -0.31x | $-1.37 Million | $4.42 Million | ▼ -489.3% |
| 2006 | 0.08x | $1.24 Million | $15.49 Million | ▼ -16.8% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | $1.09 Million | $11.35 Million | ▼ -66.7% |
| 2004 | 0.29x | $3.51 Million | $12.19 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 2003 | 0.26x | $4.02 Million | $15.39 Million | ▲ +1.9% |
| 2002 | 0.26x | $5.56 Million | $21.68 Million | ▼ -24.1% |
| 2001 | 0.34x | $6.42 Million | $19.01 Million | ▲ +26.9% |
| 2000 | 0.27x | $4.58 Million | $17.20 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 1999 | 0.46x | $5.80 Million | $12.50 Million | ▼ -21.0% |
| 1998 | 0.59x | $6.40 Million | $10.90 Million | ▲ +42.4% |
| 1997 | 0.41x | $5.40 Million | $13.10 Million | ▲ +8.4% |
| 1996 | 0.38x | $6.20 Million | $16.30 Million | ▲ +150.0% |
| 1995 | 0.15x | $2.80 Million | $18.40 Million | ▲ +24.6% |
| 1994 | 0.12x | $2.70 Million | $22.10 Million | ▼ -38.2% |
| 1993 | 0.20x | $4.90 Million | $24.80 Million | — |