Radcom Ltd (RDCM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Radcom Ltd (RDCM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of September 2023, meaning its operating cash flow of $2.54 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($25.54 Million) in one year. See Radcom Ltd (RDCM) financial flexibility to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Radcom Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Radcom Ltd across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Radcom Ltd operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Radcom Ltd (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Radcom Ltd. Check cash flow quality index of Radcom Ltd to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.47x | $14.61 Million | $30.87 Million | ▲ +45.0% |
| 2024 | 0.33x | $11.39 Million | $34.90 Million | ▲ +73.6% |
| 2023 | 0.19x | $4.71 Million | $25.04 Million | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2022 | 0.21x | $6.02 Million | $28.22 Million | ▲ +129.1% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $2.00 Million | $21.51 Million | ▲ +4125.0% |
| 2020 | 0.00x | $-50.00K | $21.62 Million | ▼ -100.8% |
| 2019 | 0.30x | $6.84 Million | $22.53 Million | ▲ +272.1% |
| 2018 | -0.18x | $-1.95 Million | $11.05 Million | ▲ +74.2% |
| 2017 | -0.68x | $-10.60 Million | $15.51 Million | ▼ -204.3% |
| 2016 | 0.66x | $9.45 Million | $14.43 Million | ▲ +257.2% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $1.88 Million | $10.27 Million | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2014 | 0.34x | $3.39 Million | $10.06 Million | ▲ +292.0% |
| 2013 | -0.18x | $-2.13 Million | $12.15 Million | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2012 | -0.18x | $-2.46 Million | $14.00 Million | ▲ +42.5% |
| 2011 | -0.31x | $-3.35 Million | $10.95 Million | ▼ -28.4% |
| 2010 | -0.24x | $-2.50 Million | $10.48 Million | ▼ -389.2% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | $890.00K | $10.80 Million | ▲ +121.4% |
| 2008 | -0.39x | $-4.96 Million | $12.86 Million | ▲ +27.5% |
| 2007 | -0.53x | $-6.02 Million | $11.32 Million | ▼ -154.1% |
| 2006 | -0.21x | $-2.59 Million | $12.38 Million | ▼ -270.3% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $1.39 Million | $11.30 Million | ▲ +157.0% |
| 2004 | -0.22x | $-2.18 Million | $10.11 Million | ▲ +60.1% |
| 2003 | -0.54x | $-4.41 Million | $8.16 Million | ▼ -128.9% |
| 2002 | -0.24x | $-1.67 Million | $7.08 Million | ▲ +61.5% |
| 2001 | -0.61x | $-3.92 Million | $6.39 Million | ▼ -55429.8% |
| 2000 | 0.00x | $9.80K | $8.86 Million | ▲ +101.6% |
| 1999 | -0.07x | $-483.16K | $6.85 Million | ▲ +76.8% |
| 1998 | -0.30x | $-2.60 Million | $8.56 Million | — |