Radcom Ltd (RDCM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Radcom Ltd (RDCM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of September 2023, meaning its operating cash flow of $2.54 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($25.54 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Radcom Ltd to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Radcom Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Radcom Ltd across 27 annual periods. Also explore Radcom Ltd (RDCM) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Radcom Ltd (1998–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Radcom Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see RDCM market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.33x | $11.39 Million | $34.90 Million | ▲ +73.6% |
| 2023 | 0.19x | $4.71 Million | $25.04 Million | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2022 | 0.21x | $6.02 Million | $28.22 Million | ▲ +129.1% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $2.00 Million | $21.51 Million | ▲ +4125.0% |
| 2020 | 0.00x | $-50.00K | $21.62 Million | ▼ -100.8% |
| 2019 | 0.30x | $6.84 Million | $22.53 Million | ▲ +272.1% |
| 2018 | -0.18x | $-1.95 Million | $11.05 Million | ▲ +74.2% |
| 2017 | -0.68x | $-10.60 Million | $15.51 Million | ▼ -204.3% |
| 2016 | 0.66x | $9.45 Million | $14.43 Million | ▲ +257.2% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $1.88 Million | $10.27 Million | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2014 | 0.34x | $3.39 Million | $10.06 Million | ▲ +292.0% |
| 2013 | -0.18x | $-2.13 Million | $12.15 Million | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2012 | -0.18x | $-2.46 Million | $14.00 Million | ▲ +42.5% |
| 2011 | -0.31x | $-3.35 Million | $10.95 Million | ▼ -28.4% |
| 2010 | -0.24x | $-2.50 Million | $10.48 Million | ▼ -389.2% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | $890.00K | $10.80 Million | ▲ +121.4% |
| 2008 | -0.39x | $-4.96 Million | $12.86 Million | ▲ +27.5% |
| 2007 | -0.53x | $-6.02 Million | $11.32 Million | ▼ -154.1% |
| 2006 | -0.21x | $-2.59 Million | $12.38 Million | ▼ -270.3% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $1.39 Million | $11.30 Million | ▲ +157.0% |
| 2004 | -0.22x | $-2.18 Million | $10.11 Million | ▲ +60.1% |
| 2003 | -0.54x | $-4.41 Million | $8.16 Million | ▼ -128.9% |
| 2002 | -0.24x | $-1.67 Million | $7.08 Million | ▲ +61.5% |
| 2001 | -0.61x | $-3.92 Million | $6.39 Million | ▼ -55429.8% |
| 2000 | 0.00x | $9.80K | $8.86 Million | ▲ +101.6% |
| 1999 | -0.07x | $-483.16K | $6.85 Million | ▲ +76.8% |
| 1998 | -0.30x | $-2.60 Million | $8.56 Million | — |