RadNet Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
RadNet Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. RadNet Inc (RDNT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $87.76 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.83 Billion) in one year. Check RadNet Inc (RDNT) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of RadNet Inc (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of RadNet Inc from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for RadNet Inc across 31 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of RadNet Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
RadNet Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
RadNet Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for RadNet Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does RadNet Inc generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $298.82 Million | $2.40 Billion | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | $233.02 Million | $2.15 Billion | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $220.86 Million | $1.88 Billion | ▲ +56.1% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $146.42 Million | $1.94 Billion | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $149.49 Million | $1.71 Billion | ▼ -42.9% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $233.76 Million | $1.53 Billion | ▲ +107.1% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $104.32 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▼ -42.5% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $116.75 Million | $909.08 Million | ▼ -27.3% |
| 2017 | 0.18x | $141.19 Million | $799.05 Million | ▲ +53.8% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | $91.60 Million | $797.42 Million | ▲ +37.4% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $67.04 Million | $801.97 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2014 | 0.08x | $61.00 Million | $732.98 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $66.42 Million | $720.37 Million | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2012 | 0.10x | $74.03 Million | $717.12 Million | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $57.64 Million | $689.00 Million | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2010 | 0.11x | $66.88 Million | $621.99 Million | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2009 | 0.14x | $76.62 Million | $555.43 Million | ▲ +76.0% |
| 2008 | 0.08x | $45.20 Million | $576.60 Million | ▲ +35.1% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | $29.20 Million | $503.24 Million | ▲ +19.0% |
| 2006 | 0.05x | $10.25 Million | $210.16 Million | ▼ -57.5% |
| 2005 | 0.11x | $22.00 Million | $191.87 Million | ▲ +31.4% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $17.05 Million | $195.40 Million | ▼ -16.3% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $20.27 Million | $194.49 Million | ▲ +53.0% |
| 2002 | 0.07x | $13.70 Million | $201.06 Million | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $13.59 Million | $172.93 Million | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2000 | 0.05x | $8.11 Million | $150.66 Million | ▲ +565.3% |
| 1999 | 0.01x | $1.10 Million | $136.00 Million | ▲ +163.8% |
| 1998 | -0.01x | $-1.49 Million | $117.34 Million | ▲ +51.5% |
| 1997 | -0.03x | $-2.87 Million | $109.84 Million | ▼ -247.6% |
| 1996 | -0.01x | $-973.02K | $129.45 Million | ▼ -105.1% |
| 1995 | 0.15x | $11.88 Million | $80.98 Million | — |