RadNet Inc (RDNT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
RadNet Inc (RDNT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $87.76 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.83 Billion) in one year. See RDNT financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
RadNet Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for RadNet Inc across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of RadNet Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for RadNet Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for RadNet Inc. Check RadNet Inc (RDNT) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $298.82 Million | $2.40 Billion | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | $233.02 Million | $2.15 Billion | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $220.86 Million | $1.88 Billion | ▲ +56.1% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $146.42 Million | $1.94 Billion | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $149.49 Million | $1.71 Billion | ▼ -42.9% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $233.76 Million | $1.53 Billion | ▲ +107.1% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $104.32 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▼ -42.5% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $116.75 Million | $909.08 Million | ▼ -27.3% |
| 2017 | 0.18x | $141.19 Million | $799.05 Million | ▲ +53.8% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | $91.60 Million | $797.42 Million | ▲ +37.4% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $67.04 Million | $801.97 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2014 | 0.08x | $61.00 Million | $732.98 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $66.42 Million | $720.37 Million | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2012 | 0.10x | $74.03 Million | $717.12 Million | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $57.64 Million | $689.00 Million | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2010 | 0.11x | $66.88 Million | $621.99 Million | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2009 | 0.14x | $76.62 Million | $555.43 Million | ▲ +76.0% |
| 2008 | 0.08x | $45.20 Million | $576.60 Million | ▲ +35.1% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | $29.20 Million | $503.24 Million | ▲ +19.0% |
| 2006 | 0.05x | $10.25 Million | $210.16 Million | ▼ -57.5% |
| 2005 | 0.11x | $22.00 Million | $191.87 Million | ▲ +31.4% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $17.05 Million | $195.40 Million | ▼ -16.3% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $20.27 Million | $194.49 Million | ▲ +53.0% |
| 2002 | 0.07x | $13.70 Million | $201.06 Million | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $13.59 Million | $172.93 Million | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2000 | 0.05x | $8.11 Million | $150.66 Million | ▲ +565.3% |
| 1999 | 0.01x | $1.10 Million | $136.00 Million | ▲ +163.8% |
| 1998 | -0.01x | $-1.49 Million | $117.34 Million | ▲ +51.5% |
| 1997 | -0.03x | $-2.87 Million | $109.84 Million | ▼ -247.6% |
| 1996 | -0.01x | $-973.02K | $129.45 Million | ▼ -105.1% |
| 1995 | 0.15x | $11.88 Million | $80.98 Million | — |