Radius Recycling, Inc. (RDUS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Radius Recycling, Inc. (RDUS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of May 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.18 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($944.09 Million) in one year. See RDUS FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Radius Recycling, Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Radius Recycling, Inc. across 32 annual periods. Also explore Radius Recycling, Inc. (RDUS) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Radius Recycling, Inc. (1993–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Radius Recycling, Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Radius Recycling, Inc. (RDUS) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.06x | $-53.41 Million | $908.03 Million | ▼ -133.9% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | $139.36 Million | $804.29 Million | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2022 | 0.27x | $237.68 Million | $868.12 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2021 | 0.29x | $190.06 Million | $654.58 Million | ▲ +28.1% |
| 2020 | 0.23x | $124.60 Million | $549.49 Million | ▲ +171.9% |
| 2019 | -0.32x | $-82.41 Million | $261.43 Million | ▲ +65.1% |
| 2018 | -0.90x | $-204.73 Million | $226.33 Million | ▲ +3.9% |
| 2017 | -0.94x | $-206.69 Million | $219.62 Million | ▲ +77.7% |
| 2016 | -4.22x | $-139.80 Million | $33.10 Million | ▼ -118.0% |
| 2015 | -1.94x | $-87.10 Million | $44.95 Million | ▼ -894.6% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $141.25 Million | $579.23 Million | ▲ +222.4% |
| 2013 | -0.20x | $-45.02 Million | $225.96 Million | ▼ -153.4% |
| 2012 | 0.37x | $244.79 Million | $655.63 Million | ▲ +100.1% |
| 2011 | -426.18x | $-35.90 Million | $84.23K | ▼ -54942.2% |
| 2010 | -0.77x | $-28.99K | $37.45K | ▲ +95.9% |
| 2009 | -18.82x | $-58.35 Million | $3.10 Million | ▼ -7698.9% |
| 2008 | 0.25x | $141.76 Million | $572.30 Million | ▼ -47.4% |
| 2007 | 0.47x | $179.31 Million | $380.98 Million | ▲ +36.7% |
| 2006 | 0.34x | $105.22 Million | $305.49 Million | ▼ -70.5% |
| 2005 | 1.17x | $146.33 Million | $125.29 Million | ▲ +189.0% |
| 2004 | 0.40x | $73.22 Million | $181.17 Million | ▲ +79.0% |
| 2003 | 0.23x | $40.94 Million | $181.28 Million | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2002 | 0.24x | $36.38 Million | $152.06 Million | ▲ +392.0% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | $8.65 Million | $177.80 Million | ▼ -75.5% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | $35.38 Million | $177.86 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $36.80 Million | $206.00 Million | ▲ +208.8% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $13.30 Million | $229.90 Million | ▼ -52.7% |
| 1997 | 0.12x | $23.10 Million | $188.90 Million | ▲ +339.7% |
| 1996 | -0.05x | $-5.80 Million | $113.70 Million | ▼ -121.8% |
| 1995 | 0.23x | $33.70 Million | $144.30 Million | ▼ -45.2% |
| 1994 | 0.43x | $20.80 Million | $48.80 Million | ▲ +236.2% |
| 1993 | 0.13x | $11.50 Million | $90.70 Million | — |