Radius Recycling, Inc. (RDUS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Radius Recycling, Inc. (RDUS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of May 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.18 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($944.09 Million) in one year. Explore RDUS strategic capital deployment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Radius Recycling, Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Radius Recycling, Inc. across 32 annual periods. Also explore Radius Recycling, Inc. asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Radius Recycling, Inc. (1993–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Radius Recycling, Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see RDUS market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.06x | $-53.41 Million | $908.03 Million | ▼ -133.9% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | $139.36 Million | $804.29 Million | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2022 | 0.27x | $237.68 Million | $868.12 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2021 | 0.29x | $190.06 Million | $654.58 Million | ▲ +28.1% |
| 2020 | 0.23x | $124.60 Million | $549.49 Million | ▲ +171.9% |
| 2019 | -0.32x | $-82.41 Million | $261.43 Million | ▲ +65.1% |
| 2018 | -0.90x | $-204.73 Million | $226.33 Million | ▲ +3.9% |
| 2017 | -0.94x | $-206.69 Million | $219.62 Million | ▲ +77.7% |
| 2016 | -4.22x | $-139.80 Million | $33.10 Million | ▼ -118.0% |
| 2015 | -1.94x | $-87.10 Million | $44.95 Million | ▼ -894.6% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $141.25 Million | $579.23 Million | ▲ +222.4% |
| 2013 | -0.20x | $-45.02 Million | $225.96 Million | ▼ -153.4% |
| 2012 | 0.37x | $244.79 Million | $655.63 Million | ▲ +100.1% |
| 2011 | -426.18x | $-35.90 Million | $84.23K | ▼ -54942.2% |
| 2010 | -0.77x | $-28.99K | $37.45K | ▲ +95.9% |
| 2009 | -18.82x | $-58.35 Million | $3.10 Million | ▼ -7698.9% |
| 2008 | 0.25x | $141.76 Million | $572.30 Million | ▼ -47.4% |
| 2007 | 0.47x | $179.31 Million | $380.98 Million | ▲ +36.7% |
| 2006 | 0.34x | $105.22 Million | $305.49 Million | ▼ -70.5% |
| 2005 | 1.17x | $146.33 Million | $125.29 Million | ▲ +189.0% |
| 2004 | 0.40x | $73.22 Million | $181.17 Million | ▲ +79.0% |
| 2003 | 0.23x | $40.94 Million | $181.28 Million | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2002 | 0.24x | $36.38 Million | $152.06 Million | ▲ +392.0% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | $8.65 Million | $177.80 Million | ▼ -75.5% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | $35.38 Million | $177.86 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $36.80 Million | $206.00 Million | ▲ +208.8% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $13.30 Million | $229.90 Million | ▼ -52.7% |
| 1997 | 0.12x | $23.10 Million | $188.90 Million | ▲ +339.7% |
| 1996 | -0.05x | $-5.80 Million | $113.70 Million | ▼ -121.8% |
| 1995 | 0.23x | $33.70 Million | $144.30 Million | ▼ -45.2% |
| 1994 | 0.43x | $20.80 Million | $48.80 Million | ▲ +236.2% |
| 1993 | 0.13x | $11.50 Million | $90.70 Million | — |