Radius Recycling, Inc. (RDUS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Radius Recycling, Inc. (RDUS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of May 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.18 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($944.09 Million) in one year. See RDUS FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Radius Recycling, Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Radius Recycling, Inc. across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Radius Recycling, Inc. cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Radius Recycling, Inc. (1993–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Radius Recycling, Inc.. Check Radius Recycling, Inc. cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.06x | $-53.41 Million | $908.03 Million | ▼ -133.9% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | $139.36 Million | $804.29 Million | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2022 | 0.27x | $237.68 Million | $868.12 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2021 | 0.29x | $190.06 Million | $654.58 Million | ▲ +28.1% |
| 2020 | 0.23x | $124.60 Million | $549.49 Million | ▲ +171.9% |
| 2019 | -0.32x | $-82.41 Million | $261.43 Million | ▲ +65.1% |
| 2018 | -0.90x | $-204.73 Million | $226.33 Million | ▲ +3.9% |
| 2017 | -0.94x | $-206.69 Million | $219.62 Million | ▲ +77.7% |
| 2016 | -4.22x | $-139.80 Million | $33.10 Million | ▼ -118.0% |
| 2015 | -1.94x | $-87.10 Million | $44.95 Million | ▼ -894.6% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $141.25 Million | $579.23 Million | ▲ +222.4% |
| 2013 | -0.20x | $-45.02 Million | $225.96 Million | ▼ -153.4% |
| 2012 | 0.37x | $244.79 Million | $655.63 Million | ▲ +100.1% |
| 2011 | -426.18x | $-35.90 Million | $84.23K | ▼ -54942.2% |
| 2010 | -0.77x | $-28.99K | $37.45K | ▲ +95.9% |
| 2009 | -18.82x | $-58.35 Million | $3.10 Million | ▼ -7698.9% |
| 2008 | 0.25x | $141.76 Million | $572.30 Million | ▼ -47.4% |
| 2007 | 0.47x | $179.31 Million | $380.98 Million | ▲ +36.7% |
| 2006 | 0.34x | $105.22 Million | $305.49 Million | ▼ -70.5% |
| 2005 | 1.17x | $146.33 Million | $125.29 Million | ▲ +189.0% |
| 2004 | 0.40x | $73.22 Million | $181.17 Million | ▲ +79.0% |
| 2003 | 0.23x | $40.94 Million | $181.28 Million | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2002 | 0.24x | $36.38 Million | $152.06 Million | ▲ +392.0% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | $8.65 Million | $177.80 Million | ▼ -75.5% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | $35.38 Million | $177.86 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $36.80 Million | $206.00 Million | ▲ +208.8% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $13.30 Million | $229.90 Million | ▼ -52.7% |
| 1997 | 0.12x | $23.10 Million | $188.90 Million | ▲ +339.7% |
| 1996 | -0.05x | $-5.80 Million | $113.70 Million | ▼ -121.8% |
| 1995 | 0.23x | $33.70 Million | $144.30 Million | ▼ -45.2% |
| 1994 | 0.43x | $20.80 Million | $48.80 Million | ▲ +236.2% |
| 1993 | 0.13x | $11.50 Million | $90.70 Million | — |