RF Industries Ltd (RFIL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
RF Industries Ltd (RFIL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $867.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($34.79 Million) in one year. Explore RFIL strategic capital deployment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
RF Industries Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for RF Industries Ltd across 30 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of RF Industries Ltd for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for RF Industries Ltd (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for RF Industries Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see RF Industries Ltd market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $4.58 Million | $41.90 Million | ▲ +27.7% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | $3.17 Million | $36.98 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $4.18 Million | $47.47 Million | ▲ +56.1% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $2.89 Million | $51.20 Million | ▲ +119.9% |
| 2021 | -0.28x | $-3.12 Million | $11.00 Million | ▼ -160.7% |
| 2020 | 0.47x | $4.55 Million | $9.73 Million | ▲ +206.3% |
| 2019 | -0.44x | $-2.71 Million | $6.17 Million | ▼ -138.1% |
| 2018 | 1.15x | $6.21 Million | $5.39 Million | ▲ +231.7% |
| 2017 | 0.35x | $1.60 Million | $4.60 Million | ▲ +241.0% |
| 2016 | -0.25x | $-1.27 Million | $5.14 Million | ▼ -962.1% |
| 2015 | 0.03x | $168.00K | $5.88 Million | ▼ -98.0% |
| 2014 | 1.42x | $4.49 Million | $3.17 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2013 | 1.57x | $5.54 Million | $3.53 Million | ▲ +251.4% |
| 2012 | 0.45x | $2.33 Million | $5.23 Million | ▲ +1607.1% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $122.84K | $4.70 Million | ▼ -97.7% |
| 2010 | 1.14x | $2.50 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2009 | 1.27x | $1.70 Million | $1.34 Million | ▲ +82.2% |
| 2008 | 0.70x | $1.14 Million | $1.65 Million | ▼ -52.4% |
| 2007 | 1.46x | $1.73 Million | $1.19 Million | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2006 | 1.18x | $2.18 Million | $1.86 Million | ▲ +462.2% |
| 2005 | 0.21x | $171.28K | $818.74K | ▼ -91.2% |
| 2004 | 2.38x | $1.46 Million | $616.06K | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2003 | 2.05x | $1.13 Million | $549.99K | ▼ -20.1% |
| 2002 | 2.57x | $1.42 Million | $550.46K | ▲ +154.7% |
| 2001 | 1.01x | $505.03K | $500.42K | ▲ +356.7% |
| 2000 | -0.39x | $-360.47K | $916.72K | ▼ -117.5% |
| 1999 | 2.25x | $900.00K | $400.00K | ▲ +75.0% |
| 1998 | 1.29x | $900.00K | $700.00K | ▲ +5.2% |
| 1997 | 1.22x | $550.00K | $450.00K | ▲ +160.9% |
| 1996 | 0.47x | $212.80K | $454.26K | — |