RF Industries Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
RF Industries Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. RF Industries Ltd (RFIL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-914.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($34.65 Million) in one year. Check RF Industries Ltd (RFIL) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of RF Industries Ltd (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of RF Industries Ltd from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for RF Industries Ltd across 30 annual periods. Check RFIL cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
RF Industries Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
RF Industries Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for RF Industries Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see RF Industries Ltd (RFIL) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $4.58 Million | $41.90 Million | ▲ +27.7% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | $3.17 Million | $36.98 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $4.18 Million | $47.47 Million | ▲ +56.1% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $2.89 Million | $51.20 Million | ▲ +119.9% |
| 2021 | -0.28x | $-3.12 Million | $11.00 Million | ▼ -160.7% |
| 2020 | 0.47x | $4.55 Million | $9.73 Million | ▲ +206.3% |
| 2019 | -0.44x | $-2.71 Million | $6.17 Million | ▼ -138.1% |
| 2018 | 1.15x | $6.21 Million | $5.39 Million | ▲ +231.7% |
| 2017 | 0.35x | $1.60 Million | $4.60 Million | ▲ +241.0% |
| 2016 | -0.25x | $-1.27 Million | $5.14 Million | ▼ -962.1% |
| 2015 | 0.03x | $168.00K | $5.88 Million | ▼ -98.0% |
| 2014 | 1.42x | $4.49 Million | $3.17 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2013 | 1.57x | $5.54 Million | $3.53 Million | ▲ +251.4% |
| 2012 | 0.45x | $2.33 Million | $5.23 Million | ▲ +1607.1% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $122.84K | $4.70 Million | ▼ -97.7% |
| 2010 | 1.14x | $2.50 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2009 | 1.27x | $1.70 Million | $1.34 Million | ▲ +82.2% |
| 2008 | 0.70x | $1.14 Million | $1.65 Million | ▼ -52.4% |
| 2007 | 1.46x | $1.73 Million | $1.19 Million | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2006 | 1.18x | $2.18 Million | $1.86 Million | ▲ +462.2% |
| 2005 | 0.21x | $171.28K | $818.74K | ▼ -91.2% |
| 2004 | 2.38x | $1.46 Million | $616.06K | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2003 | 2.05x | $1.13 Million | $549.99K | ▼ -20.1% |
| 2002 | 2.57x | $1.42 Million | $550.46K | ▲ +154.7% |
| 2001 | 1.01x | $505.03K | $500.42K | ▲ +356.7% |
| 2000 | -0.39x | $-360.47K | $916.72K | ▼ -117.5% |
| 1999 | 2.25x | $900.00K | $400.00K | ▲ +75.0% |
| 1998 | 1.29x | $900.00K | $700.00K | ▲ +5.2% |
| 1997 | 1.22x | $550.00K | $450.00K | ▲ +160.9% |
| 1996 | 0.47x | $212.80K | $454.26K | — |