RGC Resources Inc (RGCO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
RGC Resources Inc (RGCO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.08 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($224.61 Million) in one year. See RGC Resources Inc free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
RGC Resources Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for RGC Resources Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore how fast is RGC Resources Inc growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for RGC Resources Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for RGC Resources Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see RGC Resources Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.13x | $28.95 Million | $216.29 Million | ▲ +63.2% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $17.43 Million | $212.56 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $23.80 Million | $203.00 Million | ▲ +48.7% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $15.55 Million | $197.22 Million | ▲ +43.4% |
| 2021 | 0.05x | $11.57 Million | $210.41 Million | ▼ -17.3% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | $12.82 Million | $192.79 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $14.70 Million | $175.26 Million | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $13.50 Million | $139.98 Million | ▼ -8.5% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $12.98 Million | $123.09 Million | ▼ -22.3% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $14.92 Million | $109.89 Million | ▼ -22.8% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $16.76 Million | $95.30 Million | ▲ +124.5% |
| 2014 | 0.08x | $6.84 Million | $87.30 Million | ▼ -41.4% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $10.04 Million | $75.02 Million | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $11.78 Million | $79.07 Million | ▲ +7.1% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $10.68 Million | $76.76 Million | ▲ +45.4% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $7.12 Million | $74.37 Million | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2009 | 0.31x | $22.71 Million | $74.00 Million | ▲ +10283.3% |
| 2008 | 0.00x | $219.87K | $74.40 Million | ▼ -96.7% |
| 2007 | 0.09x | $6.62 Million | $73.97 Million | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $10.30 Million | $74.17 Million | ▲ +89.9% |
| 2005 | 0.07x | $5.51 Million | $75.41 Million | ▲ +169.5% |
| 2004 | 0.03x | $2.13 Million | $78.35 Million | ▼ -60.2% |
| 2003 | 0.07x | $4.55 Million | $66.64 Million | ▼ -62.1% |
| 2002 | 0.18x | $10.86 Million | $60.33 Million | ▲ +114.4% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $5.28 Million | $62.85 Million | ▲ +35.2% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | $3.57 Million | $57.42 Million | ▼ -47.8% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | $5.90 Million | $49.60 Million | ▼ -40.4% |
| 1998 | 0.20x | $8.50 Million | $42.60 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 1997 | 0.20x | $8.40 Million | $42.00 Million | ▲ +1430.0% |
| 1996 | -0.02x | $-600.00K | $39.90 Million | ▼ -106.2% |
| 1995 | 0.24x | $8.30 Million | $34.00 Million | ▲ +58.9% |
| 1994 | 0.15x | $5.10 Million | $33.20 Million | — |