Rockwell Medical Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Rockwell Medical Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Rockwell Medical Inc (RMTI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $2.08 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($21.44 Million) in one year. Check RMTI cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Rockwell Medical Inc (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Rockwell Medical Inc from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Rockwell Medical Inc across 29 annual periods. Check Rockwell Medical Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Rockwell Medical Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Rockwell Medical Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Rockwell Medical Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see RMTI cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.03x | $-659.00K | $20.16 Million | ▼ -120.7% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $4.20 Million | $26.62 Million | ▲ +151.8% |
| 2023 | -0.30x | $-9.41 Million | $30.88 Million | ▲ +41.4% |
| 2022 | -0.52x | $-16.93 Million | $32.53 Million | ▲ +28.6% |
| 2021 | -0.73x | $-33.53 Million | $46.04 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2020 | -0.68x | $-29.64 Million | $43.58 Million | ▲ +40.1% |
| 2019 | -1.14x | $-27.25 Million | $24.00 Million | ▼ -40.6% |
| 2018 | -0.81x | $-20.42 Million | $25.28 Million | ▲ +1.0% |
| 2017 | -0.82x | $-21.11 Million | $25.87 Million | ▼ -97.9% |
| 2016 | -0.41x | $-12.45 Million | $30.20 Million | ▲ +35.2% |
| 2015 | -0.64x | $-16.24 Million | $25.50 Million | ▼ -538.2% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $4.26 Million | $29.30 Million | ▲ +110.3% |
| 2013 | -1.42x | $-50.66 Million | $35.77 Million | ▼ -24.3% |
| 2012 | -1.14x | $-30.75 Million | $26.99 Million | ▼ -44.7% |
| 2011 | -0.79x | $-10.78 Million | $13.69 Million | ▼ -340.9% |
| 2010 | 0.33x | $2.10 Million | $6.43 Million | ▲ +227.3% |
| 2009 | -0.26x | $-1.43 Million | $5.56 Million | ▲ +57.1% |
| 2008 | -0.60x | $-4.27 Million | $7.14 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2007 | -0.70x | $-3.40 Million | $4.84 Million | ▲ +1.6% |
| 2006 | -0.71x | $-3.41 Million | $4.78 Million | ▼ -682.4% |
| 2005 | -0.09x | $-493.52K | $5.42 Million | ▼ -138.0% |
| 2004 | 0.24x | $1.03 Million | $4.28 Million | ▲ +312.2% |
| 2003 | 0.06x | $225.42K | $3.87 Million | ▲ +117.8% |
| 2002 | -0.33x | $-1.12 Million | $3.41 Million | ▼ -23.1% |
| 2001 | -0.27x | $-920.02K | $3.46 Million | ▲ +36.2% |
| 2000 | -0.42x | $-496.35K | $1.19 Million | ▲ +58.3% |
| 1999 | -1.00x | $-900.00K | $900.00K | ▲ +69.6% |
| 1998 | -3.29x | $-2.30 Million | $700.00K | ▼ -420.2% |
| 1997 | -0.63x | $-1.20 Million | $1.90 Million | — |