Rush Enterprises B Inc (RUSHB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Rush Enterprises B Inc (RUSHB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $60.40 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.22 Billion) in one year. See RUSHB free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Rush Enterprises B Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Rush Enterprises B Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Rush Enterprises B Inc growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Rush Enterprises B Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Rush Enterprises B Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Rush Enterprises B Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.44x | $973.09 Million | $2.20 Billion | ▲ +74.9% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $619.55 Million | $2.46 Billion | ▲ +111.1% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $295.71 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▼ -16.4% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $294.40 Million | $2.06 Billion | ▼ -44.0% |
| 2021 | 0.26x | $422.35 Million | $1.65 Billion | ▼ -42.5% |
| 2020 | 0.44x | $762.98 Million | $1.72 Billion | ▲ +137.1% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | $421.27 Million | $2.25 Billion | ▲ +85.7% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $215.36 Million | $2.13 Billion | ▲ +22.2% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $152.74 Million | $1.85 Billion | ▼ -72.4% |
| 2016 | 0.30x | $521.17 Million | $1.74 Billion | ▲ +164.5% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $227.25 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▲ +145.7% |
| 2014 | 0.05x | $88.94 Million | $1.93 Billion | ▼ -60.1% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $173.49 Million | $1.50 Billion | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $219.34 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▲ +351.1% |
| 2011 | -0.07x | $-81.37 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▼ -172.6% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | $66.43 Million | $703.01 Million | ▼ -65.4% |
| 2009 | 0.27x | $150.29 Million | $551.07 Million | ▲ +110.4% |
| 2008 | 0.13x | $83.06 Million | $640.75 Million | ▼ -68.3% |
| 2007 | 0.41x | $258.70 Million | $632.01 Million | ▲ +4805.3% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | $-6.86 Million | $788.80 Million | ▲ +90.5% |
| 2005 | -0.09x | $-52.16 Million | $566.61 Million | ▼ -459.8% |
| 2004 | -0.02x | $-5.64 Million | $343.13 Million | ▼ -128.0% |
| 2003 | 0.06x | $16.33 Million | $278.17 Million | ▼ -2.6% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $15.97 Million | $264.81 Million | ▼ -82.6% |
| 2001 | 0.35x | $89.01 Million | $256.77 Million | ▲ +327.7% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $25.18 Million | $310.70 Million | ▲ +184.7% |
| 1999 | -0.10x | $-27.83 Million | $290.84 Million | ▼ -2776.3% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | $600.00K | $167.80 Million | ▼ -95.6% |
| 1997 | 0.08x | $9.30 Million | $113.40 Million | ▲ +5845.8% |
| 1996 | 0.00x | $100.00K | $72.50 Million | ▲ +101.7% |
| 1995 | -0.08x | $-5.40 Million | $68.40 Million | — |