SHL Telemedicine Ltd American Depositary Shares (SHLT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
SHL Telemedicine Ltd American Depositary Shares (SHLT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of June 2024, meaning its operating cash flow of $-173.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($32.58 Million) in one year. See SHLT FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
SHL Telemedicine Ltd American Depositary Shares Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2002–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for SHL Telemedicine Ltd American Depositary Shares across 23 annual periods. Also explore SHL Telemedicine Ltd American Depositary annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for SHL Telemedicine Ltd American Depositary Shares (2002–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for SHL Telemedicine Ltd American Depositary Shares. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SHLT company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.01x | $-372.00K | $41.51 Million | ▲ +78.1% |
| 2023 | -0.04x | $-1.50 Million | $36.59 Million | ▼ -2784.2% |
| 2022 | 0.00x | $-73.00K | $51.49 Million | ▼ -152.7% |
| 2021 | 0.00x | $185.00K | $68.83 Million | ▼ -98.5% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $4.68 Million | $26.94 Million | ▼ -59.9% |
| 2019 | 0.43x | $10.85 Million | $25.06 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2018 | 0.71x | $12.76 Million | $17.84 Million | ▲ +119.1% |
| 2017 | 0.33x | $11.84 Million | $36.29 Million | ▲ +3052.5% |
| 2016 | -0.01x | $-429.00K | $38.81 Million | ▼ -108.8% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | $3.98 Million | $31.86 Million | ▲ +223.2% |
| 2014 | -0.10x | $-3.12 Million | $30.73 Million | ▼ -242.7% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $2.81 Million | $39.60 Million | ▲ +69.4% |
| 2012 | 0.04x | $1.63 Million | $38.75 Million | ▲ +149.9% |
| 2011 | -0.08x | $-3.50 Million | $41.63 Million | ▼ -157.0% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $3.01 Million | $20.37 Million | ▼ -40.3% |
| 2009 | 0.25x | $5.26 Million | $21.27 Million | ▲ +174.5% |
| 2008 | -0.33x | $-7.55 Million | $22.75 Million | ▼ -1441.6% |
| 2007 | -0.02x | $-1.80 Million | $83.67 Million | ▼ -217.8% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | $1.80 Million | $98.51 Million | ▲ +948.5% |
| 2005 | 0.00x | $-208.00K | $96.59 Million | ▼ -118.8% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $1.30 Million | $114.23 Million | ▲ +92.8% |
| 2003 | 0.01x | $645.00K | $108.87 Million | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $2.21 Million | $115.83 Million | — |