SHL Telemedicine Ltd American Depositary Shares (SHLT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
SHL Telemedicine Ltd American Depositary Shares (SHLT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of June 2024, meaning its operating cash flow of $-173.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($32.58 Million) in one year. See SHL Telemedicine Ltd American Depositary (SHLT) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
SHL Telemedicine Ltd American Depositary Shares Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2002–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for SHL Telemedicine Ltd American Depositary Shares across 23 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of SHL Telemedicine Ltd American Depositary.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for SHL Telemedicine Ltd American Depositary Shares (2002–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for SHL Telemedicine Ltd American Depositary Shares. Check SHLT cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.01x | $-372.00K | $41.51 Million | ▲ +78.1% |
| 2023 | -0.04x | $-1.50 Million | $36.59 Million | ▼ -2784.2% |
| 2022 | 0.00x | $-73.00K | $51.49 Million | ▼ -152.7% |
| 2021 | 0.00x | $185.00K | $68.83 Million | ▼ -98.5% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $4.68 Million | $26.94 Million | ▼ -59.9% |
| 2019 | 0.43x | $10.85 Million | $25.06 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2018 | 0.71x | $12.76 Million | $17.84 Million | ▲ +119.1% |
| 2017 | 0.33x | $11.84 Million | $36.29 Million | ▲ +3052.5% |
| 2016 | -0.01x | $-429.00K | $38.81 Million | ▼ -108.8% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | $3.98 Million | $31.86 Million | ▲ +223.2% |
| 2014 | -0.10x | $-3.12 Million | $30.73 Million | ▼ -242.7% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $2.81 Million | $39.60 Million | ▲ +69.4% |
| 2012 | 0.04x | $1.63 Million | $38.75 Million | ▲ +149.9% |
| 2011 | -0.08x | $-3.50 Million | $41.63 Million | ▼ -157.0% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $3.01 Million | $20.37 Million | ▼ -40.3% |
| 2009 | 0.25x | $5.26 Million | $21.27 Million | ▲ +174.5% |
| 2008 | -0.33x | $-7.55 Million | $22.75 Million | ▼ -1441.6% |
| 2007 | -0.02x | $-1.80 Million | $83.67 Million | ▼ -217.8% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | $1.80 Million | $98.51 Million | ▲ +948.5% |
| 2005 | 0.00x | $-208.00K | $96.59 Million | ▼ -118.8% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $1.30 Million | $114.23 Million | ▲ +92.8% |
| 2003 | 0.01x | $645.00K | $108.87 Million | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $2.21 Million | $115.83 Million | — |