Siebert Financial Corp (SIEB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Siebert Financial Corp (SIEB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-26.11 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($509.02 Million) in one year. Explore Siebert Financial Corp long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Siebert Financial Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Siebert Financial Corp across 31 annual periods. Also explore SIEB asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Siebert Financial Corp (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Siebert Financial Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Siebert Financial Corp.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $10.24 Million | $669.88 Million | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $10.05 Million | $434.58 Million | ▲ +452.0% |
| 2023 | -0.01x | $-4.80 Million | $731.09 Million | ▲ +81.9% |
| 2022 | -0.04x | $-24.61 Million | $678.13 Million | ▼ -986.5% |
| 2021 | 0.00x | $5.54 Million | $1.35 Billion | ▼ -94.3% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | $96.72 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -97.7% |
| 2019 | 3.17x | $24.35 Million | $7.69 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2018 | 4.85x | $4.87 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +171.6% |
| 2017 | 1.79x | $1.45 Million | $813.00K | ▲ +185.6% |
| 2016 | -2.09x | $-3.26 Million | $1.56 Million | ▼ -215.1% |
| 2015 | -0.66x | $-1.39 Million | $2.10 Million | ▲ +83.4% |
| 2014 | -4.00x | $-8.69 Million | $2.18 Million | ▼ -288.3% |
| 2013 | -1.03x | $-2.94 Million | $2.86 Million | ▼ -23.4% |
| 2012 | -0.83x | $-2.01 Million | $2.42 Million | ▼ -104.1% |
| 2011 | -0.41x | $-1.47 Million | $3.60 Million | ▼ -27.7% |
| 2010 | -0.32x | $-1.11 Million | $3.48 Million | ▲ +69.8% |
| 2009 | -1.06x | $-4.98 Million | $4.70 Million | ▼ -44.4% |
| 2008 | -0.73x | $-3.67 Million | $5.00 Million | ▼ -217.9% |
| 2007 | 0.62x | $3.55 Million | $5.70 Million | ▲ +104.8% |
| 2006 | 0.30x | $1.97 Million | $6.46 Million | ▼ -31.3% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | $2.64 Million | $5.97 Million | ▼ -28.8% |
| 2004 | 0.62x | $4.02 Million | $6.46 Million | ▼ -24.7% |
| 2003 | 0.83x | $4.04 Million | $4.89 Million | ▲ +278.3% |
| 2002 | -0.46x | $-2.21 Million | $4.78 Million | ▼ -346.2% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $908.00K | $4.83 Million | ▼ -89.3% |
| 2000 | 1.75x | $8.30 Million | $4.74 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 1999 | 3.23x | $9.20 Million | $2.85 Million | ▲ +826.7% |
| 1998 | 0.35x | $2.50 Million | $7.19 Million | ▼ -53.1% |
| 1997 | 0.74x | $6.08 Million | $8.20 Million | ▲ +979.9% |
| 1996 | -0.08x | $-613.19K | $7.27 Million | ▼ -208.6% |
| 1995 | 0.08x | $866.12K | $11.15 Million | — |