Siebert Financial Corp (SIEB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Siebert Financial Corp (SIEB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $402.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($669.88 Million) in one year. See SIEB cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Siebert Financial Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Siebert Financial Corp across 31 annual periods. Also explore SIEB year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Siebert Financial Corp (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Siebert Financial Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Siebert Financial Corp worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $10.24 Million | $669.88 Million | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $10.05 Million | $434.58 Million | ▲ +452.0% |
| 2023 | -0.01x | $-4.80 Million | $731.09 Million | ▲ +81.9% |
| 2022 | -0.04x | $-24.61 Million | $678.13 Million | ▼ -986.5% |
| 2021 | 0.00x | $5.54 Million | $1.35 Billion | ▼ -94.3% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | $96.72 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -97.7% |
| 2019 | 3.17x | $24.35 Million | $7.69 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2018 | 4.85x | $4.87 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +171.6% |
| 2017 | 1.79x | $1.45 Million | $813.00K | ▲ +185.6% |
| 2016 | -2.09x | $-3.26 Million | $1.56 Million | ▼ -215.1% |
| 2015 | -0.66x | $-1.39 Million | $2.10 Million | ▲ +83.4% |
| 2014 | -4.00x | $-8.69 Million | $2.18 Million | ▼ -288.3% |
| 2013 | -1.03x | $-2.94 Million | $2.86 Million | ▼ -23.4% |
| 2012 | -0.83x | $-2.01 Million | $2.42 Million | ▼ -104.1% |
| 2011 | -0.41x | $-1.47 Million | $3.60 Million | ▼ -27.7% |
| 2010 | -0.32x | $-1.11 Million | $3.48 Million | ▲ +69.8% |
| 2009 | -1.06x | $-4.98 Million | $4.70 Million | ▼ -44.4% |
| 2008 | -0.73x | $-3.67 Million | $5.00 Million | ▼ -217.9% |
| 2007 | 0.62x | $3.55 Million | $5.70 Million | ▲ +104.8% |
| 2006 | 0.30x | $1.97 Million | $6.46 Million | ▼ -31.3% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | $2.64 Million | $5.97 Million | ▼ -28.8% |
| 2004 | 0.62x | $4.02 Million | $6.46 Million | ▼ -24.7% |
| 2003 | 0.83x | $4.04 Million | $4.89 Million | ▲ +278.3% |
| 2002 | -0.46x | $-2.21 Million | $4.78 Million | ▼ -346.2% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $908.00K | $4.83 Million | ▼ -89.3% |
| 2000 | 1.75x | $8.30 Million | $4.74 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 1999 | 3.23x | $9.20 Million | $2.85 Million | ▲ +826.7% |
| 1998 | 0.35x | $2.50 Million | $7.19 Million | ▼ -53.1% |
| 1997 | 0.74x | $6.08 Million | $8.20 Million | ▲ +979.9% |
| 1996 | -0.08x | $-613.19K | $7.27 Million | ▼ -208.6% |
| 1995 | 0.08x | $866.12K | $11.15 Million | — |