Siebert Financial Corp (SIEB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Siebert Financial Corp (SIEB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-26.11 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($509.02 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is Siebert Financial Corp to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Siebert Financial Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Siebert Financial Corp across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Siebert Financial Corp operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Siebert Financial Corp (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Siebert Financial Corp. Check SIEB cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $10.24 Million | $669.88 Million | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $10.05 Million | $434.58 Million | ▲ +452.0% |
| 2023 | -0.01x | $-4.80 Million | $731.09 Million | ▲ +81.9% |
| 2022 | -0.04x | $-24.61 Million | $678.13 Million | ▼ -986.5% |
| 2021 | 0.00x | $5.54 Million | $1.35 Billion | ▼ -94.3% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | $96.72 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -97.7% |
| 2019 | 3.17x | $24.35 Million | $7.69 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2018 | 4.85x | $4.87 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +171.6% |
| 2017 | 1.79x | $1.45 Million | $813.00K | ▲ +185.6% |
| 2016 | -2.09x | $-3.26 Million | $1.56 Million | ▼ -215.1% |
| 2015 | -0.66x | $-1.39 Million | $2.10 Million | ▲ +83.4% |
| 2014 | -4.00x | $-8.69 Million | $2.18 Million | ▼ -288.3% |
| 2013 | -1.03x | $-2.94 Million | $2.86 Million | ▼ -23.4% |
| 2012 | -0.83x | $-2.01 Million | $2.42 Million | ▼ -104.1% |
| 2011 | -0.41x | $-1.47 Million | $3.60 Million | ▼ -27.7% |
| 2010 | -0.32x | $-1.11 Million | $3.48 Million | ▲ +69.8% |
| 2009 | -1.06x | $-4.98 Million | $4.70 Million | ▼ -44.4% |
| 2008 | -0.73x | $-3.67 Million | $5.00 Million | ▼ -217.9% |
| 2007 | 0.62x | $3.55 Million | $5.70 Million | ▲ +104.8% |
| 2006 | 0.30x | $1.97 Million | $6.46 Million | ▼ -31.3% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | $2.64 Million | $5.97 Million | ▼ -28.8% |
| 2004 | 0.62x | $4.02 Million | $6.46 Million | ▼ -24.7% |
| 2003 | 0.83x | $4.04 Million | $4.89 Million | ▲ +278.3% |
| 2002 | -0.46x | $-2.21 Million | $4.78 Million | ▼ -346.2% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $908.00K | $4.83 Million | ▼ -89.3% |
| 2000 | 1.75x | $8.30 Million | $4.74 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 1999 | 3.23x | $9.20 Million | $2.85 Million | ▲ +826.7% |
| 1998 | 0.35x | $2.50 Million | $7.19 Million | ▼ -53.1% |
| 1997 | 0.74x | $6.08 Million | $8.20 Million | ▲ +979.9% |
| 1996 | -0.08x | $-613.19K | $7.27 Million | ▼ -208.6% |
| 1995 | 0.08x | $866.12K | $11.15 Million | — |