Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.56 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($390.27 Million) in one year. See Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Silicon Motion Technology Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2002–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Silicon Motion Technology across 24 annual periods. Also explore Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Silicon Motion Technology (2002–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Silicon Motion Technology. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Silicon Motion Technology stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.16x | $61.43 Million | $390.27 Million | ▼ -47.2% |
| 2024 | 0.30x | $77.19 Million | $259.12 Million | ▼ -45.4% |
| 2023 | 0.55x | $149.08 Million | $273.26 Million | ▲ +49.0% |
| 2022 | 0.37x | $83.75 Million | $228.65 Million | ▼ -35.0% |
| 2021 | 0.56x | $176.87 Million | $313.75 Million | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2020 | 0.63x | $115.89 Million | $184.32 Million | ▲ +31.4% |
| 2019 | 0.48x | $77.01 Million | $160.94 Million | ▼ -38.9% |
| 2018 | 0.78x | $108.24 Million | $138.24 Million | ▲ +50.5% |
| 2017 | 0.52x | $103.88 Million | $199.68 Million | ▼ -32.3% |
| 2016 | 0.77x | $125.57 Million | $163.29 Million | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2015 | 0.77x | $65.95 Million | $85.41 Million | ▼ -30.6% |
| 2014 | 1.11x | $68.72 Million | $61.80 Million | ▲ +4.3% |
| 2013 | 1.07x | $49.13 Million | $46.07 Million | ▼ -6.8% |
| 2012 | 1.14x | $69.24 Million | $60.52 Million | ▲ +1.6% |
| 2011 | 1.13x | $53.03 Million | $47.10 Million | ▲ +454.9% |
| 2010 | -0.32x | $-9.63 Million | $30.34 Million | ▼ -210.2% |
| 2009 | 0.29x | $10.12 Million | $35.18 Million | ▼ -88.1% |
| 2008 | 2.41x | $84.78 Million | $35.16 Million | ▲ +44.1% |
| 2007 | 1.67x | $49.31 Million | $29.48 Million | ▲ +169.3% |
| 2006 | 0.62x | $18.31 Million | $29.48 Million | ▼ -26.4% |
| 2005 | 0.84x | $16.43 Million | $19.46 Million | ▲ +158.6% |
| 2004 | 0.33x | $7.46 Million | $22.85 Million | ▼ -35.4% |
| 2003 | 0.51x | $3.78 Million | $7.47 Million | ▲ +226.7% |
| 2002 | -0.40x | $-1.55 Million | $3.89 Million | — |