Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.56 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($390.27 Million) in one year. Explore how much of Silicon Motion Technology's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Silicon Motion Technology Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2002–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Silicon Motion Technology across 24 annual periods. Also explore SIMO total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Silicon Motion Technology (2002–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Silicon Motion Technology. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.16x | $61.43 Million | $390.27 Million | ▼ -47.2% |
| 2024 | 0.30x | $77.19 Million | $259.12 Million | ▼ -45.4% |
| 2023 | 0.55x | $149.08 Million | $273.26 Million | ▲ +49.0% |
| 2022 | 0.37x | $83.75 Million | $228.65 Million | ▼ -35.0% |
| 2021 | 0.56x | $176.87 Million | $313.75 Million | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2020 | 0.63x | $115.89 Million | $184.32 Million | ▲ +31.4% |
| 2019 | 0.48x | $77.01 Million | $160.94 Million | ▼ -38.9% |
| 2018 | 0.78x | $108.24 Million | $138.24 Million | ▲ +50.5% |
| 2017 | 0.52x | $103.88 Million | $199.68 Million | ▼ -32.3% |
| 2016 | 0.77x | $125.57 Million | $163.29 Million | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2015 | 0.77x | $65.95 Million | $85.41 Million | ▼ -30.6% |
| 2014 | 1.11x | $68.72 Million | $61.80 Million | ▲ +4.3% |
| 2013 | 1.07x | $49.13 Million | $46.07 Million | ▼ -6.8% |
| 2012 | 1.14x | $69.24 Million | $60.52 Million | ▲ +1.6% |
| 2011 | 1.13x | $53.03 Million | $47.10 Million | ▲ +454.9% |
| 2010 | -0.32x | $-9.63 Million | $30.34 Million | ▼ -210.2% |
| 2009 | 0.29x | $10.12 Million | $35.18 Million | ▼ -88.1% |
| 2008 | 2.41x | $84.78 Million | $35.16 Million | ▲ +44.1% |
| 2007 | 1.67x | $49.31 Million | $29.48 Million | ▲ +169.3% |
| 2006 | 0.62x | $18.31 Million | $29.48 Million | ▼ -26.4% |
| 2005 | 0.84x | $16.43 Million | $19.46 Million | ▲ +158.6% |
| 2004 | 0.33x | $7.46 Million | $22.85 Million | ▼ -35.4% |
| 2003 | 0.51x | $3.78 Million | $7.47 Million | ▲ +226.7% |
| 2002 | -0.40x | $-1.55 Million | $3.89 Million | — |