Sirius XM Holding Inc (SIRI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Sirius XM Holding Inc (SIRI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $271.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($15.42 Billion) in one year. See Sirius XM Holding Inc free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Sirius XM Holding Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Sirius XM Holding Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore Sirius XM Holding Inc (SIRI) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Sirius XM Holding Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sirius XM Holding Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Sirius XM Holding Inc (SIRI) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $1.90 Billion | $15.67 Billion | ▲ +14.4% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | $1.74 Billion | $16.45 Billion | ▼ -25.1% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $1.83 Billion | $12.94 Billion | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2022 | 0.15x | $1.98 Billion | $13.37 Billion | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | $2.00 Billion | $12.90 Billion | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $2.02 Billion | $12.62 Billion | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | $2.02 Billion | $11.88 Billion | ▼ -9.8% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | $1.88 Billion | $9.99 Billion | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.19x | $1.86 Billion | $9.85 Billion | ▼ -3.7% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | $1.72 Billion | $8.80 Billion | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2015 | 0.15x | $1.24 Billion | $8.21 Billion | ▼ -14.6% |
| 2014 | 0.18x | $1.25 Billion | $7.07 Billion | ▼ -1.9% |
| 2013 | 0.18x | $1.10 Billion | $6.10 Billion | ▲ +12.4% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | $806.76 Million | $5.02 Billion | ▲ +101.0% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $543.63 Million | $6.79 Billion | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $512.89 Million | $7.18 Billion | ▲ +19.1% |
| 2009 | 0.06x | $433.83 Million | $7.23 Billion | ▲ +394.0% |
| 2008 | -0.02x | $-152.80 Million | $7.48 Billion | ▲ +65.9% |
| 2007 | -0.06x | $-148.77 Million | $2.49 Billion | ▲ +70.5% |
| 2006 | -0.20x | $-414.55 Million | $2.05 Billion | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2005 | -0.16x | $-273.74 Million | $1.76 Billion | ▲ +55.5% |
| 2004 | -0.35x | $-334.46 Million | $956.98 Million | ▲ +64.1% |
| 2003 | -0.97x | $-284.49 Million | $292.12 Million | ▼ -134.6% |
| 2002 | -0.42x | $-320.81 Million | $772.94 Million | ▼ -236.0% |
| 2001 | -0.12x | $-148.83 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▼ -86.3% |
| 2000 | -0.07x | $-68.47 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▲ +77.6% |
| 1999 | -0.30x | $-272.60 Million | $923.15 Million | ▼ -4559.8% |
| 1998 | -0.01x | $-1.72 Million | $271.42 Million | ▲ +48.2% |
| 1997 | -0.01x | $-2.99 Million | $244.38 Million | ▲ +99.9% |
| 1996 | -10.43x | $-3.58 Million | $343.20K | ▼ -95.6% |
| 1995 | -5.33x | $-1.60 Million | $300.00K | ▲ +11.1% |
| 1994 | -6.00x | $-3.60 Million | $600.00K | — |