Sirius XM Holding Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Sirius XM Holding Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Sirius XM Holding Inc (SIRI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $271.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($15.42 Billion) in one year. Check how aggressively does Sirius XM Holding Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Sirius XM Holding Inc (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Sirius XM Holding Inc from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Sirius XM Holding Inc across 32 annual periods. Check cash flow quality index of Sirius XM Holding Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Sirius XM Holding Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Sirius XM Holding Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sirius XM Holding Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Sirius XM Holding Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $1.90 Billion | $15.67 Billion | ▲ +14.4% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | $1.74 Billion | $16.45 Billion | ▼ -25.1% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $1.83 Billion | $12.94 Billion | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2022 | 0.15x | $1.98 Billion | $13.37 Billion | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | $2.00 Billion | $12.90 Billion | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $2.02 Billion | $12.62 Billion | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | $2.02 Billion | $11.88 Billion | ▼ -9.8% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | $1.88 Billion | $9.99 Billion | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.19x | $1.86 Billion | $9.85 Billion | ▼ -3.7% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | $1.72 Billion | $8.80 Billion | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2015 | 0.15x | $1.24 Billion | $8.21 Billion | ▼ -14.6% |
| 2014 | 0.18x | $1.25 Billion | $7.07 Billion | ▼ -1.9% |
| 2013 | 0.18x | $1.10 Billion | $6.10 Billion | ▲ +12.4% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | $806.76 Million | $5.02 Billion | ▲ +101.0% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $543.63 Million | $6.79 Billion | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $512.89 Million | $7.18 Billion | ▲ +19.1% |
| 2009 | 0.06x | $433.83 Million | $7.23 Billion | ▲ +394.0% |
| 2008 | -0.02x | $-152.80 Million | $7.48 Billion | ▲ +65.9% |
| 2007 | -0.06x | $-148.77 Million | $2.49 Billion | ▲ +70.5% |
| 2006 | -0.20x | $-414.55 Million | $2.05 Billion | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2005 | -0.16x | $-273.74 Million | $1.76 Billion | ▲ +55.5% |
| 2004 | -0.35x | $-334.46 Million | $956.98 Million | ▲ +64.1% |
| 2003 | -0.97x | $-284.49 Million | $292.12 Million | ▼ -134.6% |
| 2002 | -0.42x | $-320.81 Million | $772.94 Million | ▼ -236.0% |
| 2001 | -0.12x | $-148.83 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▼ -86.3% |
| 2000 | -0.07x | $-68.47 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▲ +77.6% |
| 1999 | -0.30x | $-272.60 Million | $923.15 Million | ▼ -4559.8% |
| 1998 | -0.01x | $-1.72 Million | $271.42 Million | ▲ +48.2% |
| 1997 | -0.01x | $-2.99 Million | $244.38 Million | ▲ +99.9% |
| 1996 | -10.43x | $-3.58 Million | $343.20K | ▼ -95.6% |
| 1995 | -5.33x | $-1.60 Million | $300.00K | ▲ +11.1% |
| 1994 | -6.00x | $-3.60 Million | $600.00K | — |