Sirius XM Holding Inc (SIRI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Sirius XM Holding Inc (SIRI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $271.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($15.42 Billion) in one year. See financial agility of Sirius XM Holding Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Sirius XM Holding Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Sirius XM Holding Inc across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Sirius XM Holding Inc (SIRI) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Sirius XM Holding Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sirius XM Holding Inc. Check SIRI operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $1.90 Billion | $15.67 Billion | ▲ +14.4% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | $1.74 Billion | $16.45 Billion | ▼ -25.1% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $1.83 Billion | $12.94 Billion | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2022 | 0.15x | $1.98 Billion | $13.37 Billion | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | $2.00 Billion | $12.90 Billion | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $2.02 Billion | $12.62 Billion | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | $2.02 Billion | $11.88 Billion | ▼ -9.8% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | $1.88 Billion | $9.99 Billion | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.19x | $1.86 Billion | $9.85 Billion | ▼ -3.7% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | $1.72 Billion | $8.80 Billion | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2015 | 0.15x | $1.24 Billion | $8.21 Billion | ▼ -14.6% |
| 2014 | 0.18x | $1.25 Billion | $7.07 Billion | ▼ -1.9% |
| 2013 | 0.18x | $1.10 Billion | $6.10 Billion | ▲ +12.4% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | $806.76 Million | $5.02 Billion | ▲ +101.0% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $543.63 Million | $6.79 Billion | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $512.89 Million | $7.18 Billion | ▲ +19.1% |
| 2009 | 0.06x | $433.83 Million | $7.23 Billion | ▲ +394.0% |
| 2008 | -0.02x | $-152.80 Million | $7.48 Billion | ▲ +65.9% |
| 2007 | -0.06x | $-148.77 Million | $2.49 Billion | ▲ +70.5% |
| 2006 | -0.20x | $-414.55 Million | $2.05 Billion | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2005 | -0.16x | $-273.74 Million | $1.76 Billion | ▲ +55.5% |
| 2004 | -0.35x | $-334.46 Million | $956.98 Million | ▲ +64.1% |
| 2003 | -0.97x | $-284.49 Million | $292.12 Million | ▼ -134.6% |
| 2002 | -0.42x | $-320.81 Million | $772.94 Million | ▼ -236.0% |
| 2001 | -0.12x | $-148.83 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▼ -86.3% |
| 2000 | -0.07x | $-68.47 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▲ +77.6% |
| 1999 | -0.30x | $-272.60 Million | $923.15 Million | ▼ -4559.8% |
| 1998 | -0.01x | $-1.72 Million | $271.42 Million | ▲ +48.2% |
| 1997 | -0.01x | $-2.99 Million | $244.38 Million | ▲ +99.9% |
| 1996 | -10.43x | $-3.58 Million | $343.20K | ▼ -95.6% |
| 1995 | -5.33x | $-1.60 Million | $300.00K | ▲ +11.1% |
| 1994 | -6.00x | $-3.60 Million | $600.00K | — |