Sirius XM Holding Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Sirius XM Holding Inc tangible net worth ratio. Sirius XM Holding Inc (SIRI) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 87.9% as of March 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($1.42 Billion) from net assets ($11.73 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore SIRI year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Sirius XM Holding Inc (1994–2025)
Tangible net worth ratio of Sirius XM Holding Inc from 1994 to 2025. This chart shows how Sirius XM Holding Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 21 annual periods from 1994 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 87.9%, reflecting net assets of $11.73 Billion with intangible assets of $1.42 Billion USD. Check Sirius XM Holding Inc (SIRI) strategic asset index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Sirius XM Holding Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Sirius XM Holding Inc tangible net worth ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Sirius XM Holding Inc from 1994 to 2025, covering 21 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see market cap of Sirius XM Holding Inc.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 87.4% | $11.56 Billion | $1.46 Billion | $27.24 Billion | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2024 | 85.7% | $11.07 Billion | $1.58 Billion | $27.52 Billion | ▲ +187.7 pp |
| 2014 | -101.9% | $1.31 Billion | $2.65 Billion | $8.38 Billion | ▼ -103.6 pp |
| 2013 | 1.7% | $2.75 Billion | $2.70 Billion | $8.84 Billion | ▼ -36.0 pp |
| 2012 | 37.6% | $4.04 Billion | $2.52 Billion | $9.05 Billion | ▲ +303.1 pp |
| 2011 | -265.5% | $704.14 Million | $2.57 Billion | $7.50 Billion | ▲ +900.8 pp |
| 2010 | -1166.3% | $207.64 Million | $2.63 Billion | $7.38 Billion | ▲ +5933.8 pp |
| 2009 | -7100.0% | $37.43 Million | $2.70 Billion | $7.26 Billion | ▲ +25274.2 pp |
| 2008 | -32374.2% | $8.54 Million | $2.77 Billion | $7.49 Billion | ▼ -32448.5 pp |
| 2005 | 74.3% | $324.97 Million | $83.65 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▼ -17.4 pp |
| 2004 | 91.6% | $1.00 Billion | $83.65 Million | $1.96 Billion | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2003 | 93.7% | $1.33 Billion | $83.65 Million | $1.62 Billion | ▲ +8.4 pp |
| 2002 | 85.3% | $568.00 Million | $83.65 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +11.2 pp |
| 2001 | 74.1% | $322.65 Million | $83.65 Million | $1.53 Billion | ▲ +2.8 pp |
| 2000 | 71.3% | $290.48 Million | $83.37 Million | $1.32 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 1999 | 70.6% | $283.46 Million | $83.37 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▼ -7.0 pp |
| 1998 | 77.6% | $372.46 Million | $83.37 Million | $643.88 Million | ▲ +82.5 pp |
| 1997 | -4.9% | $79.43 Million | $83.35 Million | $323.81 Million | ▼ -104.9 pp |
| 1996 | 100.0% | $1.99 Million | $0.00 | $2.33 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1995 | 100.0% | $2.00 Million | $0.00 | $2.30 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1994 | 100.0% | $3.40 Million | $0.00 | $4.00 Million | — |