Stabilis Solutions Inc (SLNG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Stabilis Solutions Inc (SLNG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.24x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $12.42 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($52.15 Million) in one year. Explore Stabilis Solutions Inc (SLNG) long-term investment share to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Stabilis Solutions Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Stabilis Solutions Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore Stabilis Solutions Inc (SLNG) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Stabilis Solutions Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Stabilis Solutions Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Stabilis Solutions Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.52x | $8.60 Million | $16.44 Million | ▼ -29.0% |
| 2024 | 0.74x | $13.69 Million | $18.58 Million | ▲ +114.0% |
| 2023 | 0.34x | $6.71 Million | $19.49 Million | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2022 | 0.40x | $14.70 Million | $36.71 Million | ▲ +144.8% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $4.30 Million | $26.28 Million | ▲ +123.8% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | $1.34 Million | $18.28 Million | ▼ -60.0% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $4.11 Million | $22.48 Million | ▲ +221.5% |
| 2018 | -0.15x | $-3.32 Million | $22.04 Million | ▼ -371.7% |
| 2017 | -0.03x | $-683.00K | $21.40 Million | ▲ +90.4% |
| 2016 | -0.33x | $-6.60 Million | $19.88 Million | ▼ -323.3% |
| 2015 | 0.15x | $2.37 Million | $15.92 Million | ▲ +219.1% |
| 2014 | -0.12x | $-2.21 Million | $17.70 Million | ▼ -712.8% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $317.00K | $15.56 Million | ▼ -66.8% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $845.00K | $13.79 Million | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $1.05 Million | $18.71 Million | ▲ +136.1% |
| 2010 | -0.16x | $-1.73 Million | $11.10 Million | ▼ -216.7% |
| 2009 | 0.13x | $1.28 Million | $9.61 Million | ▲ +301.1% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $524.93K | $15.77 Million | ▲ +109.2% |
| 2007 | -0.36x | $-5.52 Million | $15.19 Million | ▼ -340.4% |
| 2006 | 0.15x | $107.84K | $713.51K | ▲ +69.7% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $74.80K | $840.01K | ▲ +110.6% |
| 2004 | -0.84x | $-363.47K | $430.87K | ▼ -38.3% |
| 2003 | -0.61x | $-333.80K | $547.42K | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2002 | -1.09x | $-512.99K | $471.07K | ▲ +42.3% |
| 2001 | -1.89x | $-867.41K | $459.54K | ▼ -3.7% |
| 2000 | -1.82x | $-1.20 Million | $656.71K | ▼ -3.2% |
| 1999 | -1.76x | $-1.20 Million | $681.00K | ▼ -296.8% |
| 1998 | -0.44x | $-400.00K | $900.00K | — |