Simulations Plus Inc (SLP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Simulations Plus Inc (SLP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.50x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.41 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($12.71 Million) in one year. See Simulations Plus Inc free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Simulations Plus Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Simulations Plus Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore Simulations Plus Inc (SLP) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Simulations Plus Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Simulations Plus Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Simulations Plus Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.54x | $18.13 Million | $7.13 Million | ▲ +380.7% |
| 2024 | 0.53x | $13.32 Million | $25.21 Million | ▼ -45.3% |
| 2023 | 0.97x | $21.86 Million | $22.61 Million | ▼ -33.8% |
| 2022 | 1.46x | $17.90 Million | $12.26 Million | ▲ +20.4% |
| 2021 | 1.21x | $19.20 Million | $15.83 Million | ▲ +53.2% |
| 2020 | 0.79x | $10.91 Million | $13.78 Million | ▼ -42.8% |
| 2019 | 1.38x | $11.64 Million | $8.41 Million | ▲ +82.1% |
| 2018 | 0.76x | $9.29 Million | $12.23 Million | ▲ +40.3% |
| 2017 | 0.54x | $6.88 Million | $12.71 Million | ▼ -49.2% |
| 2016 | 1.07x | $5.42 Million | $5.08 Million | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2015 | 0.91x | $7.13 Million | $7.81 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2014 | 0.96x | $5.31 Million | $5.55 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2013 | 1.41x | $2.56 Million | $1.82 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2012 | 1.72x | $3.78 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2011 | 1.91x | $3.50 Million | $1.83 Million | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2010 | 1.80x | $2.91 Million | $1.61 Million | ▲ +29.5% |
| 2009 | 1.39x | $2.49 Million | $1.79 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2008 | 1.46x | $2.48 Million | $1.69 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2007 | 1.77x | $2.96 Million | $1.67 Million | ▲ +136.4% |
| 2006 | 0.75x | $1.15 Million | $1.53 Million | ▼ -37.9% |
| 2005 | 1.21x | $1.44 Million | $1.19 Million | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2004 | 0.67x | $575.05K | $860.38K | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2003 | 0.79x | $541.85K | $688.47K | ▲ +479.7% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | $111.07K | $818.11K | ▼ -54.7% |
| 2001 | 0.30x | $292.10K | $974.29K | ▲ +98.5% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $147.95K | $979.77K | ▲ +47.4% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | $89.16K | $870.60K | ▲ +105.8% |
| 1998 | -1.78x | $-1.29 Million | $727.07K | ▲ +46.1% |
| 1997 | -3.30x | $-1.40 Million | $424.69K | ▼ -2737.4% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | $100.00K | $800.00K | — |