Simulations Plus Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Simulations Plus Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Simulations Plus Inc (SLP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.73x as of May 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $10.25 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($13.94 Million) in one year. Check Simulations Plus Inc (SLP) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Simulations Plus Inc (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Simulations Plus Inc from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Simulations Plus Inc across 30 annual periods. Check Simulations Plus Inc (SLP) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Simulations Plus Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Simulations Plus Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Simulations Plus Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see SLP cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.54x | $18.13 Million | $7.13 Million | ▲ +380.7% |
| 2024 | 0.53x | $13.32 Million | $25.21 Million | ▼ -45.3% |
| 2023 | 0.97x | $21.86 Million | $22.61 Million | ▼ -33.8% |
| 2022 | 1.46x | $17.90 Million | $12.26 Million | ▲ +20.4% |
| 2021 | 1.21x | $19.20 Million | $15.83 Million | ▲ +53.2% |
| 2020 | 0.79x | $10.91 Million | $13.78 Million | ▼ -42.8% |
| 2019 | 1.38x | $11.64 Million | $8.41 Million | ▲ +82.1% |
| 2018 | 0.76x | $9.29 Million | $12.23 Million | ▲ +40.3% |
| 2017 | 0.54x | $6.88 Million | $12.71 Million | ▼ -49.2% |
| 2016 | 1.07x | $5.42 Million | $5.08 Million | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2015 | 0.91x | $7.13 Million | $7.81 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2014 | 0.96x | $5.31 Million | $5.55 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2013 | 1.41x | $2.56 Million | $1.82 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2012 | 1.72x | $3.78 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2011 | 1.91x | $3.50 Million | $1.83 Million | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2010 | 1.80x | $2.91 Million | $1.61 Million | ▲ +29.5% |
| 2009 | 1.39x | $2.49 Million | $1.79 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2008 | 1.46x | $2.48 Million | $1.69 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2007 | 1.77x | $2.96 Million | $1.67 Million | ▲ +136.4% |
| 2006 | 0.75x | $1.15 Million | $1.53 Million | ▼ -37.9% |
| 2005 | 1.21x | $1.44 Million | $1.19 Million | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2004 | 0.67x | $575.05K | $860.38K | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2003 | 0.79x | $541.85K | $688.47K | ▲ +479.7% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | $111.07K | $818.11K | ▼ -54.7% |
| 2001 | 0.30x | $292.10K | $974.29K | ▲ +98.5% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $147.95K | $979.77K | ▲ +47.4% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | $89.16K | $870.60K | ▲ +105.8% |
| 1998 | -1.78x | $-1.29 Million | $727.07K | ▲ +46.1% |
| 1997 | -3.30x | $-1.40 Million | $424.69K | ▼ -2737.4% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | $100.00K | $800.00K | — |