Simulations Plus Inc (SLP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Simulations Plus Inc (SLP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.73x as of May 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $10.25 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($13.94 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Simulations Plus Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Simulations Plus Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Simulations Plus Inc across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Simulations Plus Inc cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Simulations Plus Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Simulations Plus Inc. Check SLP cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.54x | $18.13 Million | $7.13 Million | ▲ +380.7% |
| 2024 | 0.53x | $13.32 Million | $25.21 Million | ▼ -45.3% |
| 2023 | 0.97x | $21.86 Million | $22.61 Million | ▼ -33.8% |
| 2022 | 1.46x | $17.90 Million | $12.26 Million | ▲ +20.4% |
| 2021 | 1.21x | $19.20 Million | $15.83 Million | ▲ +53.2% |
| 2020 | 0.79x | $10.91 Million | $13.78 Million | ▼ -42.8% |
| 2019 | 1.38x | $11.64 Million | $8.41 Million | ▲ +82.1% |
| 2018 | 0.76x | $9.29 Million | $12.23 Million | ▲ +40.3% |
| 2017 | 0.54x | $6.88 Million | $12.71 Million | ▼ -49.2% |
| 2016 | 1.07x | $5.42 Million | $5.08 Million | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2015 | 0.91x | $7.13 Million | $7.81 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2014 | 0.96x | $5.31 Million | $5.55 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2013 | 1.41x | $2.56 Million | $1.82 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2012 | 1.72x | $3.78 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2011 | 1.91x | $3.50 Million | $1.83 Million | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2010 | 1.80x | $2.91 Million | $1.61 Million | ▲ +29.5% |
| 2009 | 1.39x | $2.49 Million | $1.79 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2008 | 1.46x | $2.48 Million | $1.69 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2007 | 1.77x | $2.96 Million | $1.67 Million | ▲ +136.4% |
| 2006 | 0.75x | $1.15 Million | $1.53 Million | ▼ -37.9% |
| 2005 | 1.21x | $1.44 Million | $1.19 Million | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2004 | 0.67x | $575.05K | $860.38K | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2003 | 0.79x | $541.85K | $688.47K | ▲ +479.7% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | $111.07K | $818.11K | ▼ -54.7% |
| 2001 | 0.30x | $292.10K | $974.29K | ▲ +98.5% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $147.95K | $979.77K | ▲ +47.4% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | $89.16K | $870.60K | ▲ +105.8% |
| 1998 | -1.78x | $-1.29 Million | $727.07K | ▲ +46.1% |
| 1997 | -3.30x | $-1.40 Million | $424.69K | ▼ -2737.4% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | $100.00K | $800.00K | — |