Smith Micro Software Inc (SMSI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Smith Micro Software Inc (SMSI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.30x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.14 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($7.24 Million) in one year. See SMSI free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Smith Micro Software Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Smith Micro Software Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore SMSI net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Smith Micro Software Inc (1994–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Smith Micro Software Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Smith Micro Software Inc (SMSI) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -1.96x | $-14.29 Million | $7.29 Million | ▼ -186.5% |
| 2023 | -0.68x | $-6.97 Million | $10.19 Million | ▲ +3.3% |
| 2022 | -0.71x | $-19.26 Million | $27.20 Million | ▲ +23.5% |
| 2021 | -0.93x | $-12.92 Million | $13.95 Million | ▼ -265.7% |
| 2020 | 0.56x | $7.92 Million | $14.19 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2019 | 0.80x | $9.99 Million | $12.51 Million | ▲ +228.9% |
| 2018 | -0.62x | $-2.87 Million | $4.64 Million | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2017 | -0.80x | $-7.42 Million | $9.31 Million | ▲ +22.1% |
| 2016 | -1.02x | $-11.50 Million | $11.25 Million | ▼ -19323.4% |
| 2015 | -0.01x | $-55.00K | $10.45 Million | ▲ +99.0% |
| 2014 | -0.55x | $-6.85 Million | $12.49 Million | ▲ +55.8% |
| 2013 | -1.24x | $-16.57 Million | $13.37 Million | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2012 | -1.09x | $-12.80 Million | $11.73 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2011 | -0.90x | $-13.55 Million | $15.08 Million | ▼ -160.4% |
| 2010 | 1.49x | $24.74 Million | $16.63 Million | ▲ +44.6% |
| 2009 | 1.03x | $18.48 Million | $17.95 Million | ▼ -27.5% |
| 2008 | 1.42x | $16.45 Million | $11.59 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2007 | 2.31x | $18.26 Million | $7.91 Million | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2006 | 2.97x | $14.75 Million | $4.97 Million | ▲ +352.9% |
| 2005 | 0.66x | $2.46 Million | $3.76 Million | ▼ -62.4% |
| 2004 | 1.75x | $3.02 Million | $1.73 Million | ▲ +326.9% |
| 2003 | -0.77x | $-767.00K | $997.00K | ▼ -308.4% |
| 2002 | 0.37x | $426.00K | $1.15 Million | ▲ +138.3% |
| 2001 | -0.96x | $-2.85 Million | $2.96 Million | ▼ -11.1% |
| 2000 | -0.87x | $-2.51 Million | $2.89 Million | ▲ +43.0% |
| 1999 | -1.52x | $-3.20 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -340.2% |
| 1998 | -0.35x | $-900.00K | $2.60 Million | ▼ -653.8% |
| 1997 | 0.06x | $100.00K | $1.60 Million | ▲ +147.9% |
| 1996 | -0.13x | $-300.00K | $2.30 Million | ▼ -110.1% |
| 1995 | 1.29x | $4.50 Million | $3.50 Million | ▼ -63.3% |
| 1994 | 3.50x | $2.10 Million | $600.00K | — |