Smith Micro Software Inc (SMSI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Smith Micro Software Inc (SMSI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.30x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.14 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($7.24 Million) in one year. Check Smith Micro Software Inc (SMSI) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Smith Micro Software Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Smith Micro Software Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore SMSI total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Smith Micro Software Inc (1994–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Smith Micro Software Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Smith Micro Software Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -1.96x | $-14.29 Million | $7.29 Million | ▼ -186.5% |
| 2023 | -0.68x | $-6.97 Million | $10.19 Million | ▲ +3.3% |
| 2022 | -0.71x | $-19.26 Million | $27.20 Million | ▲ +23.5% |
| 2021 | -0.93x | $-12.92 Million | $13.95 Million | ▼ -265.7% |
| 2020 | 0.56x | $7.92 Million | $14.19 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2019 | 0.80x | $9.99 Million | $12.51 Million | ▲ +228.9% |
| 2018 | -0.62x | $-2.87 Million | $4.64 Million | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2017 | -0.80x | $-7.42 Million | $9.31 Million | ▲ +22.1% |
| 2016 | -1.02x | $-11.50 Million | $11.25 Million | ▼ -19323.4% |
| 2015 | -0.01x | $-55.00K | $10.45 Million | ▲ +99.0% |
| 2014 | -0.55x | $-6.85 Million | $12.49 Million | ▲ +55.8% |
| 2013 | -1.24x | $-16.57 Million | $13.37 Million | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2012 | -1.09x | $-12.80 Million | $11.73 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2011 | -0.90x | $-13.55 Million | $15.08 Million | ▼ -160.4% |
| 2010 | 1.49x | $24.74 Million | $16.63 Million | ▲ +44.6% |
| 2009 | 1.03x | $18.48 Million | $17.95 Million | ▼ -27.5% |
| 2008 | 1.42x | $16.45 Million | $11.59 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2007 | 2.31x | $18.26 Million | $7.91 Million | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2006 | 2.97x | $14.75 Million | $4.97 Million | ▲ +352.9% |
| 2005 | 0.66x | $2.46 Million | $3.76 Million | ▼ -62.4% |
| 2004 | 1.75x | $3.02 Million | $1.73 Million | ▲ +326.9% |
| 2003 | -0.77x | $-767.00K | $997.00K | ▼ -308.4% |
| 2002 | 0.37x | $426.00K | $1.15 Million | ▲ +138.3% |
| 2001 | -0.96x | $-2.85 Million | $2.96 Million | ▼ -11.1% |
| 2000 | -0.87x | $-2.51 Million | $2.89 Million | ▲ +43.0% |
| 1999 | -1.52x | $-3.20 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -340.2% |
| 1998 | -0.35x | $-900.00K | $2.60 Million | ▼ -653.8% |
| 1997 | 0.06x | $100.00K | $1.60 Million | ▲ +147.9% |
| 1996 | -0.13x | $-300.00K | $2.30 Million | ▼ -110.1% |
| 1995 | 1.29x | $4.50 Million | $3.50 Million | ▼ -63.3% |
| 1994 | 3.50x | $2.10 Million | $600.00K | — |