Soligenix Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Soligenix Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Soligenix Inc. (SNGX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.44x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.71 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.85 Million) in one year. Check SNGX cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Soligenix Inc. (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Soligenix Inc. from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Soligenix Inc. across 31 annual periods. Check Soligenix Inc. investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Soligenix Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Soligenix Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Soligenix Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Soligenix Inc. (SNGX) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.60x | $-10.27 Million | $3.94 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2024 | -1.73x | $-8.40 Million | $4.85 Million | ▼ -46.6% |
| 2023 | -1.18x | $-8.60 Million | $7.27 Million | ▼ -56.6% |
| 2022 | -0.76x | $-12.65 Million | $16.75 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2021 | -0.73x | $-11.74 Million | $16.15 Million | ▼ -2.5% |
| 2020 | -0.71x | $-11.45 Million | $16.15 Million | ▲ +40.3% |
| 2019 | -1.19x | $-7.51 Million | $6.32 Million | ▲ +30.9% |
| 2018 | -1.72x | $-7.24 Million | $4.21 Million | ▲ +14.7% |
| 2017 | -2.02x | $-6.51 Million | $3.23 Million | ▼ -16.1% |
| 2016 | -1.74x | $-4.98 Million | $2.87 Million | ▼ -138.7% |
| 2015 | -0.73x | $-5.39 Million | $7.41 Million | ▼ -109.6% |
| 2014 | -0.35x | $-2.47 Million | $7.11 Million | ▲ +21.9% |
| 2013 | -0.44x | $-4.46 Million | $10.04 Million | ▲ +80.6% |
| 2012 | -2.28x | $-2.64 Million | $1.15 Million | ▼ -67.6% |
| 2011 | -1.36x | $-1.95 Million | $1.43 Million | ▲ +54.6% |
| 2010 | -3.00x | $-5.73 Million | $1.91 Million | ▲ +21.2% |
| 2009 | -3.80x | $-4.60 Million | $1.21 Million | ▼ -89.0% |
| 2008 | -2.01x | $-2.79 Million | $1.39 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 2007 | -5.03x | $-6.00 Million | $1.19 Million | ▼ -205.2% |
| 2006 | -1.65x | $-4.14 Million | $2.52 Million | ▲ +35.0% |
| 2005 | -2.53x | $-4.67 Million | $1.84 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2004 | -2.11x | $-4.41 Million | $2.08 Million | ▲ +49.5% |
| 2003 | -4.19x | $-4.22 Million | $1.01 Million | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2002 | -3.87x | $-6.00 Million | $1.55 Million | ▼ -1228.7% |
| 2001 | -0.29x | $-3.98 Million | $13.67 Million | ▲ +73.7% |
| 2000 | -1.10x | $-3.45 Million | $3.12 Million | ▼ -12.6% |
| 1999 | -0.98x | $-1.98 Million | $2.02 Million | ▲ +64.1% |
| 1998 | -2.73x | $-4.10 Million | $1.50 Million | ▲ +16.8% |
| 1997 | -3.29x | $-2.30 Million | $700.00K | ▲ +71.5% |
| 1996 | -11.54x | $-1.50 Million | $130.00K | ▲ +33.8% |
| 1995 | -17.44x | $-1.00 Million | $57.48K | — |