Soligenix Inc. (SNGX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Soligenix Inc. (SNGX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.79x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.93 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($3.70 Million) in one year. Check Soligenix Inc. total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Soligenix Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Soligenix Inc. across 30 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Soligenix Inc. for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Soligenix Inc. (1995–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Soligenix Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SNGX market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -1.73x | $-8.40 Million | $4.85 Million | ▼ -46.6% |
| 2023 | -1.18x | $-8.60 Million | $7.27 Million | ▼ -56.6% |
| 2022 | -0.76x | $-12.65 Million | $16.75 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2021 | -0.73x | $-11.74 Million | $16.15 Million | ▼ -2.5% |
| 2020 | -0.71x | $-11.45 Million | $16.15 Million | ▲ +40.3% |
| 2019 | -1.19x | $-7.51 Million | $6.32 Million | ▲ +30.9% |
| 2018 | -1.72x | $-7.24 Million | $4.21 Million | ▲ +14.7% |
| 2017 | -2.02x | $-6.51 Million | $3.23 Million | ▼ -16.1% |
| 2016 | -1.74x | $-4.98 Million | $2.87 Million | ▼ -138.7% |
| 2015 | -0.73x | $-5.39 Million | $7.41 Million | ▼ -109.6% |
| 2014 | -0.35x | $-2.47 Million | $7.11 Million | ▲ +21.9% |
| 2013 | -0.44x | $-4.46 Million | $10.04 Million | ▲ +80.6% |
| 2012 | -2.28x | $-2.64 Million | $1.15 Million | ▼ -67.6% |
| 2011 | -1.36x | $-1.95 Million | $1.43 Million | ▲ +54.6% |
| 2010 | -3.00x | $-5.73 Million | $1.91 Million | ▲ +21.2% |
| 2009 | -3.80x | $-4.60 Million | $1.21 Million | ▼ -89.0% |
| 2008 | -2.01x | $-2.79 Million | $1.39 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 2007 | -5.03x | $-6.00 Million | $1.19 Million | ▼ -205.2% |
| 2006 | -1.65x | $-4.14 Million | $2.52 Million | ▲ +35.0% |
| 2005 | -2.53x | $-4.67 Million | $1.84 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2004 | -2.11x | $-4.41 Million | $2.08 Million | ▲ +49.5% |
| 2003 | -4.19x | $-4.22 Million | $1.01 Million | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2002 | -3.87x | $-6.00 Million | $1.55 Million | ▼ -1228.7% |
| 2001 | -0.29x | $-3.98 Million | $13.67 Million | ▲ +73.7% |
| 2000 | -1.10x | $-3.45 Million | $3.12 Million | ▼ -12.6% |
| 1999 | -0.98x | $-1.98 Million | $2.02 Million | ▲ +64.1% |
| 1998 | -2.73x | $-4.10 Million | $1.50 Million | ▲ +16.8% |
| 1997 | -3.29x | $-2.30 Million | $700.00K | ▲ +71.5% |
| 1996 | -11.54x | $-1.50 Million | $130.00K | ▲ +33.8% |
| 1995 | -17.44x | $-1.00 Million | $57.48K | — |