Soligenix Inc. (SNGX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Soligenix Inc. (SNGX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.79x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.93 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($3.70 Million) in one year. See Soligenix Inc. free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Soligenix Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Soligenix Inc. across 30 annual periods. Also explore Soligenix Inc. (SNGX) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Soligenix Inc. (1995–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Soligenix Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SNGX company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -1.73x | $-8.40 Million | $4.85 Million | ▼ -46.6% |
| 2023 | -1.18x | $-8.60 Million | $7.27 Million | ▼ -56.6% |
| 2022 | -0.76x | $-12.65 Million | $16.75 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2021 | -0.73x | $-11.74 Million | $16.15 Million | ▼ -2.5% |
| 2020 | -0.71x | $-11.45 Million | $16.15 Million | ▲ +40.3% |
| 2019 | -1.19x | $-7.51 Million | $6.32 Million | ▲ +30.9% |
| 2018 | -1.72x | $-7.24 Million | $4.21 Million | ▲ +14.7% |
| 2017 | -2.02x | $-6.51 Million | $3.23 Million | ▼ -16.1% |
| 2016 | -1.74x | $-4.98 Million | $2.87 Million | ▼ -138.7% |
| 2015 | -0.73x | $-5.39 Million | $7.41 Million | ▼ -109.6% |
| 2014 | -0.35x | $-2.47 Million | $7.11 Million | ▲ +21.9% |
| 2013 | -0.44x | $-4.46 Million | $10.04 Million | ▲ +80.6% |
| 2012 | -2.28x | $-2.64 Million | $1.15 Million | ▼ -67.6% |
| 2011 | -1.36x | $-1.95 Million | $1.43 Million | ▲ +54.6% |
| 2010 | -3.00x | $-5.73 Million | $1.91 Million | ▲ +21.2% |
| 2009 | -3.80x | $-4.60 Million | $1.21 Million | ▼ -89.0% |
| 2008 | -2.01x | $-2.79 Million | $1.39 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 2007 | -5.03x | $-6.00 Million | $1.19 Million | ▼ -205.2% |
| 2006 | -1.65x | $-4.14 Million | $2.52 Million | ▲ +35.0% |
| 2005 | -2.53x | $-4.67 Million | $1.84 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2004 | -2.11x | $-4.41 Million | $2.08 Million | ▲ +49.5% |
| 2003 | -4.19x | $-4.22 Million | $1.01 Million | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2002 | -3.87x | $-6.00 Million | $1.55 Million | ▼ -1228.7% |
| 2001 | -0.29x | $-3.98 Million | $13.67 Million | ▲ +73.7% |
| 2000 | -1.10x | $-3.45 Million | $3.12 Million | ▼ -12.6% |
| 1999 | -0.98x | $-1.98 Million | $2.02 Million | ▲ +64.1% |
| 1998 | -2.73x | $-4.10 Million | $1.50 Million | ▲ +16.8% |
| 1997 | -3.29x | $-2.30 Million | $700.00K | ▲ +71.5% |
| 1996 | -11.54x | $-1.50 Million | $130.00K | ▲ +33.8% |
| 1995 | -17.44x | $-1.00 Million | $57.48K | — |