Sono-Tek Corp (SOTK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Sono-Tek Corp (SOTK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.25x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.21 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.80 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does Sono-Tek Corp generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Sono-Tek Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Sono-Tek Corp across 37 annual periods. Also explore Sono-Tek Corp net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Sono-Tek Corp (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sono-Tek Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SOTK market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $525.02K | $5.62 Million | ▼ -45.0% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | $1.16 Million | $6.85 Million | ▼ -29.0% |
| 2023 | 0.24x | $1.33 Million | $5.54 Million | ▼ -59.9% |
| 2022 | 0.60x | $2.32 Million | $3.88 Million | ▲ +350.6% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | $725.19K | $5.47 Million | ▼ -79.8% |
| 2020 | 0.66x | $3.25 Million | $4.96 Million | ▲ +2276.1% |
| 2019 | -0.03x | $-108.98K | $3.62 Million | ▼ -105.7% |
| 2018 | 0.53x | $1.80 Million | $3.39 Million | ▲ +45.5% |
| 2017 | 0.37x | $1.03 Million | $2.81 Million | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2016 | 0.21x | $628.82K | $3.00 Million | ▼ -21.9% |
| 2015 | 0.27x | $924.46K | $3.45 Million | ▼ -47.2% |
| 2014 | 0.51x | $1.67 Million | $3.28 Million | ▲ +155.4% |
| 2013 | 0.20x | $611.49K | $3.07 Million | ▼ -38.8% |
| 2012 | 0.32x | $1.19 Million | $3.67 Million | ▲ +1.6% |
| 2011 | 0.32x | $1.16 Million | $3.62 Million | ▼ -2.6% |
| 2010 | 0.33x | $493.98K | $1.51 Million | ▲ +151.7% |
| 2009 | -0.63x | $-734.65K | $1.16 Million | ▼ -228.3% |
| 2008 | 0.50x | $490.74K | $991.36K | ▼ -41.7% |
| 2007 | 0.85x | $730.53K | $860.46K | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2006 | 0.94x | $880.43K | $933.73K | ▲ +120.6% |
| 2005 | 0.43x | $484.93K | $1.13 Million | ▲ +5352.9% |
| 2004 | -0.01x | $-16.98K | $2.09 Million | ▲ +61.7% |
| 2003 | -0.02x | $-48.09K | $2.26 Million | ▼ -112.1% |
| 2002 | 0.18x | $462.93K | $2.64 Million | ▲ +420.5% |
| 2001 | -0.05x | $-154.09K | $2.82 Million | ▲ +74.0% |
| 2000 | -0.21x | $-796.67K | $3.79 Million | ▼ -4.1% |
| 1999 | -0.20x | $-190.00K | $940.00K | ▼ -425.7% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $90.00K | $1.45 Million | ▼ -52.9% |
| 1997 | 0.13x | $170.00K | $1.29 Million | ▲ +103.5% |
| 1996 | 0.06x | $90.00K | $1.39 Million | ▲ +12.2% |
| 1995 | 0.06x | $90.00K | $1.56 Million | ▲ +134.2% |
| 1994 | -0.17x | $-270.00K | $1.60 Million | ▼ -87.0% |
| 1993 | -0.09x | $-120.00K | $1.33 Million | ▲ +69.5% |
| 1992 | -0.30x | $-260.00K | $880.00K | ▲ +48.6% |
| 1991 | -0.57x | $-270.00K | $470.00K | ▼ -142.1% |
| 1990 | 1.36x | $300.00K | $220.00K | ▲ +428.4% |
| 1989 | 0.26x | $80.00K | $310.00K | — |