Sono-Tek Corp (SOTK) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Sono-Tek Corp (SOTK) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 99.8% as of November 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($31.79K) from net assets ($19.13 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Sono-Tek Corp net assets for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Sono-Tek Corp Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1989–2025)
This chart shows how Sono-Tek Corp's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 30 annual periods from 1989 to 2025. As of November 2025, the ratio stands at 99.8%, reflecting net assets of $19.13 Million with intangible assets of $31.79K USD. Also explore Sono-Tek Corp (SOTK) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Sono-Tek Corp (1989–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Sono-Tek Corp from 1989 to 2025, covering 30 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Sono-Tek Corp (SOTK) total market value.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 99.8% | $17.79 Million | $37.39K | $23.41 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2024 | 99.7% | $16.28 Million | $47.57K | $23.13 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2023 | 99.6% | $14.63 Million | $57.20K | $20.17 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2022 | 99.4% | $13.74 Million | $76.02K | $17.63 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2021 | 99.1% | $10.95 Million | $95.46K | $16.42 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2020 | 98.9% | $9.78 Million | $106.29K | $14.74 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2019 | 98.6% | $8.58 Million | $122.94K | $12.20 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2018 | 98.4% | $8.39 Million | $136.58K | $11.78 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2017 | 98.1% | $7.92 Million | $153.33K | $10.74 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2016 | 97.7% | $7.67 Million | $174.03K | $10.67 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2015 | 97.5% | $7.14 Million | $175.41K | $10.59 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2014 | 97.4% | $6.50 Million | $171.83K | $9.78 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2013 | 98.2% | $5.99 Million | $106.02K | $9.07 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2012 | 98.6% | $5.81 Million | $83.45K | $9.48 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2011 | 98.2% | $4.32 Million | $79.15K | $7.94 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2010 | 97.9% | $3.67 Million | $76.91K | $5.18 Million | ▲ +20.6 pp |
| 2009 | 77.3% | $3.53 Million | $801.29K | $4.69 Million | ▼ -10.1 pp |
| 2008 | 87.5% | $4.90 Million | $614.38K | $5.89 Million | ▲ +7.0 pp |
| 2007 | 80.5% | $4.85 Million | $946.83K | $5.71 Million | ▼ -18.8 pp |
| 2006 | 99.3% | $4.23 Million | $29.92K | $5.16 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2005 | 99.0% | $2.31 Million | $22.89K | $3.44 Million | ▲ +4.3 pp |
| 2004 | 94.7% | $586.85K | $31.05K | $2.67 Million | ▲ +172.9 pp |
| 2000 | -78.2% | $727.63K | $1.30 Million | $4.51 Million | ▼ -168.2 pp |
| 1999 | 90.0% | $400.00K | $40.00K | $1.34 Million | ▲ +7.9 pp |
| 1998 | 82.1% | $280.00K | $50.00K | $1.73 Million | ▲ +282.1 pp |
| 1994 | -200.0% | $40.00K | $120.00K | $1.64 Million | ▼ -269.8 pp |
| 1992 | 69.8% | $430.00K | $130.00K | $1.31 Million | ▼ -15.6 pp |
| 1991 | 85.4% | $820.00K | $120.00K | $1.29 Million | ▼ -7.4 pp |
| 1990 | 92.7% | $1.65 Million | $120.00K | $1.87 Million | ▲ +3.0 pp |
| 1989 | 89.7% | $970.00K | $100.00K | $1.28 Million | — |