SpartanNash Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
SpartanNash Co cash flow-to-debt ratio. SpartanNash Co (SPTN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $86.73 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.82 Billion) in one year. Check SPTN operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of SpartanNash Co (1996–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of SpartanNash Co from 1996 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for SpartanNash Co across 29 annual periods. Check SPTN capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
SpartanNash Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2024)
SpartanNash Co cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for SpartanNash Co. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does SpartanNash Co generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.11x | $205.88 Million | $1.86 Billion | ▲ +82.6% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $95.68 Million | $1.58 Billion | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $110.35 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $161.16 Million | $1.42 Billion | ▼ -43.1% |
| 2020 | 0.20x | $306.72 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | $180.19 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | $171.66 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▲ +245.0% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $52.84 Million | $1.33 Billion | ▼ -71.7% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $154.52 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -28.2% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | $219.49 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▲ +66.0% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | $139.07 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▲ +74.7% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $85.79 Million | $1.28 Billion | ▼ -48.6% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $59.34 Million | $454.01 Million | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2011 | 0.21x | $93.73 Million | $439.87 Million | ▲ +5.9% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | $89.76 Million | $445.89 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $91.70 Million | $479.58 Million | ▲ +17.0% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $80.04 Million | $489.56 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $71.06 Million | $403.49 Million | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2006 | 0.19x | $60.17 Million | $314.76 Million | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2005 | 0.22x | $50.70 Million | $233.18 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2004 | 0.23x | $60.63 Million | $259.05 Million | ▲ +143.5% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $27.57 Million | $286.78 Million | ▼ -20.4% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $53.94 Million | $446.67 Million | ▲ +86.8% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $34.21 Million | $529.10 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2000 | 0.10x | $58.28 Million | $583.13 Million | ▼ -18.6% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | $54.57 Million | $444.57 Million | ▼ -1.2% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | $49.99 Million | $402.32 Million | ▲ +22.5% |
| 1997 | 0.10x | $29.61 Million | $291.94 Million | ▲ +83.2% |
| 1996 | 0.06x | $16.41 Million | $296.37 Million | — |