SpartanNash Co (SPTN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
SpartanNash Co (SPTN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $86.73 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.82 Billion) in one year. See SPTN FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
SpartanNash Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for SpartanNash Co across 29 annual periods. Also explore how fast is SpartanNash Co growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for SpartanNash Co (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for SpartanNash Co. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of SpartanNash Co.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.11x | $205.88 Million | $1.86 Billion | ▲ +82.6% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $95.68 Million | $1.58 Billion | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $110.35 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $161.16 Million | $1.42 Billion | ▼ -43.1% |
| 2020 | 0.20x | $306.72 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | $180.19 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | $171.66 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▲ +245.0% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $52.84 Million | $1.33 Billion | ▼ -71.7% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $154.52 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -28.2% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | $219.49 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▲ +66.0% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | $139.07 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▲ +74.7% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $85.79 Million | $1.28 Billion | ▼ -48.6% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $59.34 Million | $454.01 Million | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2011 | 0.21x | $93.73 Million | $439.87 Million | ▲ +5.9% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | $89.76 Million | $445.89 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $91.70 Million | $479.58 Million | ▲ +17.0% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $80.04 Million | $489.56 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $71.06 Million | $403.49 Million | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2006 | 0.19x | $60.17 Million | $314.76 Million | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2005 | 0.22x | $50.70 Million | $233.18 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2004 | 0.23x | $60.63 Million | $259.05 Million | ▲ +143.5% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $27.57 Million | $286.78 Million | ▼ -20.4% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $53.94 Million | $446.67 Million | ▲ +86.8% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $34.21 Million | $529.10 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2000 | 0.10x | $58.28 Million | $583.13 Million | ▼ -18.6% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | $54.57 Million | $444.57 Million | ▼ -1.2% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | $49.99 Million | $402.32 Million | ▲ +22.5% |
| 1997 | 0.10x | $29.61 Million | $291.94 Million | ▲ +83.2% |
| 1996 | 0.06x | $16.41 Million | $296.37 Million | — |