SpartanNash Co (SPTN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
SpartanNash Co (SPTN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $86.73 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.82 Billion) in one year. Check SpartanNash Co total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
SpartanNash Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for SpartanNash Co across 29 annual periods. Also explore SpartanNash Co asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for SpartanNash Co (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for SpartanNash Co. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of SpartanNash Co.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.11x | $205.88 Million | $1.86 Billion | ▲ +82.6% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $95.68 Million | $1.58 Billion | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $110.35 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $161.16 Million | $1.42 Billion | ▼ -43.1% |
| 2020 | 0.20x | $306.72 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | $180.19 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | $171.66 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▲ +245.0% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $52.84 Million | $1.33 Billion | ▼ -71.7% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $154.52 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -28.2% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | $219.49 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▲ +66.0% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | $139.07 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▲ +74.7% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $85.79 Million | $1.28 Billion | ▼ -48.6% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $59.34 Million | $454.01 Million | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2011 | 0.21x | $93.73 Million | $439.87 Million | ▲ +5.9% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | $89.76 Million | $445.89 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $91.70 Million | $479.58 Million | ▲ +17.0% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $80.04 Million | $489.56 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $71.06 Million | $403.49 Million | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2006 | 0.19x | $60.17 Million | $314.76 Million | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2005 | 0.22x | $50.70 Million | $233.18 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2004 | 0.23x | $60.63 Million | $259.05 Million | ▲ +143.5% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $27.57 Million | $286.78 Million | ▼ -20.4% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $53.94 Million | $446.67 Million | ▲ +86.8% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $34.21 Million | $529.10 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2000 | 0.10x | $58.28 Million | $583.13 Million | ▼ -18.6% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | $54.57 Million | $444.57 Million | ▼ -1.2% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | $49.99 Million | $402.32 Million | ▲ +22.5% |
| 1997 | 0.10x | $29.61 Million | $291.94 Million | ▲ +83.2% |
| 1996 | 0.06x | $16.41 Million | $296.37 Million | — |