STAAR Surgical Company (STAA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
STAAR Surgical Company (STAA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.91K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($117.44 Million) in one year. Explore STAA long-term asset investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
STAAR Surgical Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for STAAR Surgical Company across 36 annual periods. Also explore STAAR Surgical Company balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for STAAR Surgical Company (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for STAAR Surgical Company. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see STAA stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.29x | $-34.23 Million | $117.44 Million | ▼ -308.0% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | $15.72 Million | $112.19 Million | ▼ -1.3% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $14.59 Million | $102.74 Million | ▼ -67.1% |
| 2022 | 0.43x | $35.72 Million | $82.71 Million | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2021 | 0.50x | $43.96 Million | $87.22 Million | ▲ +44.8% |
| 2020 | 0.35x | $20.95 Million | $60.19 Million | ▼ -35.7% |
| 2019 | 0.54x | $25.80 Million | $47.64 Million | ▲ +48.1% |
| 2018 | 0.37x | $12.77 Million | $34.91 Million | ▲ +220.4% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $2.85 Million | $25.00 Million | ▲ +199.6% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $1.05 Million | $27.54 Million | ▲ +142.5% |
| 2015 | -0.09x | $-2.16 Million | $24.11 Million | ▲ +75.4% |
| 2014 | -0.36x | $-7.95 Million | $21.81 Million | ▼ -351.0% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | $3.35 Million | $23.08 Million | ▲ +3.9% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $3.22 Million | $23.02 Million | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | $5.35 Million | $19.55 Million | ▲ +212.4% |
| 2010 | -0.24x | $-4.42 Million | $18.16 Million | ▼ -741.1% |
| 2009 | 0.04x | $1.43 Million | $37.61 Million | ▲ +116.9% |
| 2008 | -0.23x | $-8.23 Million | $36.55 Million | ▲ +63.9% |
| 2007 | -0.62x | $-11.18 Million | $17.95 Million | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2006 | -0.54x | $-8.65 Million | $16.01 Million | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2005 | -0.56x | $-6.98 Million | $12.39 Million | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2004 | -0.62x | $-8.80 Million | $14.11 Million | ▼ -77.5% |
| 2003 | -0.35x | $-4.15 Million | $11.80 Million | ▼ -999.9% |
| 2002 | 0.04x | $569.00K | $14.57 Million | ▲ +129.0% |
| 2001 | -0.13x | $-2.56 Million | $18.98 Million | ▲ +46.1% |
| 2000 | -0.25x | $-5.37 Million | $21.48 Million | ▼ -263.8% |
| 1999 | 0.15x | $4.90 Million | $32.10 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 1998 | 0.17x | $4.30 Million | $24.70 Million | ▼ -59.7% |
| 1997 | 0.43x | $7.60 Million | $17.60 Million | ▼ -26.3% |
| 1996 | 0.59x | $8.50 Million | $14.50 Million | ▲ +18.4% |
| 1995 | 0.50x | $5.00 Million | $10.10 Million | ▼ -14.6% |
| 1994 | 0.58x | $4.00 Million | $6.90 Million | ▲ +494.2% |
| 1993 | -0.15x | $-1.00 Million | $6.80 Million | ▲ +73.9% |
| 1992 | -0.56x | $-3.10 Million | $5.50 Million | ▲ +41.3% |
| 1991 | -0.96x | $-4.90 Million | $5.10 Million | ▼ -9988.2% |
| 1990 | -0.01x | $-100.00K | $10.50 Million | — |