STAAR Surgical Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
STAAR Surgical Company cash flow-to-debt ratio. STAAR Surgical Company (STAA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.18x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $19.69 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($109.81 Million) in one year. Check STAAR Surgical Company cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of STAAR Surgical Company (1990–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of STAAR Surgical Company from 1990 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for STAAR Surgical Company across 36 annual periods. Check STAAR Surgical Company cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
STAAR Surgical Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2025)
STAAR Surgical Company cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for STAAR Surgical Company. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see STAAR Surgical Company (STAA) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.29x | $-34.23 Million | $117.44 Million | ▼ -308.0% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | $15.72 Million | $112.19 Million | ▼ -1.3% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $14.59 Million | $102.74 Million | ▼ -67.1% |
| 2022 | 0.43x | $35.72 Million | $82.71 Million | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2021 | 0.50x | $43.96 Million | $87.22 Million | ▲ +44.8% |
| 2020 | 0.35x | $20.95 Million | $60.19 Million | ▼ -35.7% |
| 2019 | 0.54x | $25.80 Million | $47.64 Million | ▲ +48.1% |
| 2018 | 0.37x | $12.77 Million | $34.91 Million | ▲ +220.4% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $2.85 Million | $25.00 Million | ▲ +199.6% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $1.05 Million | $27.54 Million | ▲ +142.5% |
| 2015 | -0.09x | $-2.16 Million | $24.11 Million | ▲ +75.4% |
| 2014 | -0.36x | $-7.95 Million | $21.81 Million | ▼ -351.0% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | $3.35 Million | $23.08 Million | ▲ +3.9% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $3.22 Million | $23.02 Million | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | $5.35 Million | $19.55 Million | ▲ +212.4% |
| 2010 | -0.24x | $-4.42 Million | $18.16 Million | ▼ -741.1% |
| 2009 | 0.04x | $1.43 Million | $37.61 Million | ▲ +116.9% |
| 2008 | -0.23x | $-8.23 Million | $36.55 Million | ▲ +63.9% |
| 2007 | -0.62x | $-11.18 Million | $17.95 Million | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2006 | -0.54x | $-8.65 Million | $16.01 Million | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2005 | -0.56x | $-6.98 Million | $12.39 Million | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2004 | -0.62x | $-8.80 Million | $14.11 Million | ▼ -77.5% |
| 2003 | -0.35x | $-4.15 Million | $11.80 Million | ▼ -999.9% |
| 2002 | 0.04x | $569.00K | $14.57 Million | ▲ +129.0% |
| 2001 | -0.13x | $-2.56 Million | $18.98 Million | ▲ +46.1% |
| 2000 | -0.25x | $-5.37 Million | $21.48 Million | ▼ -263.8% |
| 1999 | 0.15x | $4.90 Million | $32.10 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 1998 | 0.17x | $4.30 Million | $24.70 Million | ▼ -59.7% |
| 1997 | 0.43x | $7.60 Million | $17.60 Million | ▼ -26.3% |
| 1996 | 0.59x | $8.50 Million | $14.50 Million | ▲ +18.4% |
| 1995 | 0.50x | $5.00 Million | $10.10 Million | ▼ -14.6% |
| 1994 | 0.58x | $4.00 Million | $6.90 Million | ▲ +494.2% |
| 1993 | -0.15x | $-1.00 Million | $6.80 Million | ▲ +73.9% |
| 1992 | -0.56x | $-3.10 Million | $5.50 Million | ▲ +41.3% |
| 1991 | -0.96x | $-4.90 Million | $5.10 Million | ▼ -9988.2% |
| 1990 | -0.01x | $-100.00K | $10.50 Million | — |