STAAR Surgical Company (STAA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
STAAR Surgical Company (STAA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.91K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($117.44 Million) in one year. See STAA cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
STAAR Surgical Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for STAAR Surgical Company across 36 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of STAAR Surgical Company to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for STAAR Surgical Company (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for STAAR Surgical Company. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see STAA market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.29x | $-34.23 Million | $117.44 Million | ▼ -308.0% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | $15.72 Million | $112.19 Million | ▼ -1.3% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $14.59 Million | $102.74 Million | ▼ -67.1% |
| 2022 | 0.43x | $35.72 Million | $82.71 Million | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2021 | 0.50x | $43.96 Million | $87.22 Million | ▲ +44.8% |
| 2020 | 0.35x | $20.95 Million | $60.19 Million | ▼ -35.7% |
| 2019 | 0.54x | $25.80 Million | $47.64 Million | ▲ +48.1% |
| 2018 | 0.37x | $12.77 Million | $34.91 Million | ▲ +220.4% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $2.85 Million | $25.00 Million | ▲ +199.6% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $1.05 Million | $27.54 Million | ▲ +142.5% |
| 2015 | -0.09x | $-2.16 Million | $24.11 Million | ▲ +75.4% |
| 2014 | -0.36x | $-7.95 Million | $21.81 Million | ▼ -351.0% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | $3.35 Million | $23.08 Million | ▲ +3.9% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $3.22 Million | $23.02 Million | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | $5.35 Million | $19.55 Million | ▲ +212.4% |
| 2010 | -0.24x | $-4.42 Million | $18.16 Million | ▼ -741.1% |
| 2009 | 0.04x | $1.43 Million | $37.61 Million | ▲ +116.9% |
| 2008 | -0.23x | $-8.23 Million | $36.55 Million | ▲ +63.9% |
| 2007 | -0.62x | $-11.18 Million | $17.95 Million | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2006 | -0.54x | $-8.65 Million | $16.01 Million | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2005 | -0.56x | $-6.98 Million | $12.39 Million | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2004 | -0.62x | $-8.80 Million | $14.11 Million | ▼ -77.5% |
| 2003 | -0.35x | $-4.15 Million | $11.80 Million | ▼ -999.9% |
| 2002 | 0.04x | $569.00K | $14.57 Million | ▲ +129.0% |
| 2001 | -0.13x | $-2.56 Million | $18.98 Million | ▲ +46.1% |
| 2000 | -0.25x | $-5.37 Million | $21.48 Million | ▼ -263.8% |
| 1999 | 0.15x | $4.90 Million | $32.10 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 1998 | 0.17x | $4.30 Million | $24.70 Million | ▼ -59.7% |
| 1997 | 0.43x | $7.60 Million | $17.60 Million | ▼ -26.3% |
| 1996 | 0.59x | $8.50 Million | $14.50 Million | ▲ +18.4% |
| 1995 | 0.50x | $5.00 Million | $10.10 Million | ▼ -14.6% |
| 1994 | 0.58x | $4.00 Million | $6.90 Million | ▲ +494.2% |
| 1993 | -0.15x | $-1.00 Million | $6.80 Million | ▲ +73.9% |
| 1992 | -0.56x | $-3.10 Million | $5.50 Million | ▲ +41.3% |
| 1991 | -0.96x | $-4.90 Million | $5.10 Million | ▼ -9988.2% |
| 1990 | -0.01x | $-100.00K | $10.50 Million | — |