Streamline Health Solutions Inc (STRM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Streamline Health Solutions Inc (STRM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of April 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-969.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($24.77 Million) in one year. Explore Streamline Health Solutions Inc strategic investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Streamline Health Solutions Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Streamline Health Solutions Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore Streamline Health Solutions Inc asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Streamline Health Solutions Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Streamline Health Solutions Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Streamline Health Solutions Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.06x | $-1.51 Million | $23.30 Million | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2024 | -0.10x | $-2.21 Million | $22.92 Million | ▲ +64.8% |
| 2023 | -0.27x | $-7.14 Million | $26.01 Million | ▼ -117.7% |
| 2022 | -0.13x | $-3.50 Million | $27.77 Million | ▲ +81.4% |
| 2021 | -0.68x | $-5.76 Million | $8.49 Million | ▼ -132549.1% |
| 2020 | 0.00x | $-8.00K | $15.65 Million | ▼ -100.8% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $1.40 Million | $23.05 Million | ▼ -45.0% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $2.03 Million | $18.43 Million | ▲ +129.0% |
| 2017 | 0.05x | $1.01 Million | $20.95 Million | ▼ -78.6% |
| 2016 | 0.22x | $5.88 Million | $26.15 Million | ▲ +325.1% |
| 2015 | -0.10x | $-3.01 Million | $30.14 Million | ▼ -1532.2% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $212.71K | $30.49 Million | ▲ +306.3% |
| 2013 | 0.00x | $-115.13K | $34.04 Million | ▼ -102.0% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $2.90 Million | $17.14 Million | ▼ -53.1% |
| 2011 | 0.36x | $3.39 Million | $9.42 Million | ▲ +48.5% |
| 2010 | 0.24x | $2.13 Million | $8.79 Million | ▼ -49.2% |
| 2009 | 0.48x | $4.60 Million | $9.64 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2008 | 0.40x | $3.20 Million | $7.91 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 2007 | 0.38x | $2.50 Million | $6.66 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2006 | 0.34x | $2.77 Million | $8.08 Million | ▼ -33.6% |
| 2005 | 0.52x | $3.24 Million | $6.28 Million | ▲ +144.2% |
| 2004 | 0.21x | $2.16 Million | $10.21 Million | ▼ -3.7% |
| 2003 | 0.22x | $2.50 Million | $11.37 Million | ▲ +183.0% |
| 2002 | 0.08x | $823.00K | $10.60 Million | ▲ +15.5% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | $786.73K | $11.70 Million | ▲ +35.6% |
| 2000 | 0.05x | $600.00K | $12.10 Million | ▲ +105.6% |
| 1999 | -0.89x | $-10.40 Million | $11.70 Million | ▲ +55.6% |
| 1998 | -2.00x | $-10.80 Million | $5.40 Million | ▼ -51.1% |
| 1997 | -1.32x | $-4.50 Million | $3.40 Million | ▼ -410.5% |
| 1996 | -0.26x | $-700.00K | $2.70 Million | — |