Streamline Health Solutions Inc (STRM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Streamline Health Solutions Inc (STRM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of April 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-969.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($24.77 Million) in one year. See Streamline Health Solutions Inc free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Streamline Health Solutions Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Streamline Health Solutions Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore STRM shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Streamline Health Solutions Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Streamline Health Solutions Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see STRM company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.06x | $-1.51 Million | $23.30 Million | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2024 | -0.10x | $-2.21 Million | $22.92 Million | ▲ +64.8% |
| 2023 | -0.27x | $-7.14 Million | $26.01 Million | ▼ -117.7% |
| 2022 | -0.13x | $-3.50 Million | $27.77 Million | ▲ +81.4% |
| 2021 | -0.68x | $-5.76 Million | $8.49 Million | ▼ -132549.1% |
| 2020 | 0.00x | $-8.00K | $15.65 Million | ▼ -100.8% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $1.40 Million | $23.05 Million | ▼ -45.0% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $2.03 Million | $18.43 Million | ▲ +129.0% |
| 2017 | 0.05x | $1.01 Million | $20.95 Million | ▼ -78.6% |
| 2016 | 0.22x | $5.88 Million | $26.15 Million | ▲ +325.1% |
| 2015 | -0.10x | $-3.01 Million | $30.14 Million | ▼ -1532.2% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $212.71K | $30.49 Million | ▲ +306.3% |
| 2013 | 0.00x | $-115.13K | $34.04 Million | ▼ -102.0% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $2.90 Million | $17.14 Million | ▼ -53.1% |
| 2011 | 0.36x | $3.39 Million | $9.42 Million | ▲ +48.5% |
| 2010 | 0.24x | $2.13 Million | $8.79 Million | ▼ -49.2% |
| 2009 | 0.48x | $4.60 Million | $9.64 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2008 | 0.40x | $3.20 Million | $7.91 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 2007 | 0.38x | $2.50 Million | $6.66 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2006 | 0.34x | $2.77 Million | $8.08 Million | ▼ -33.6% |
| 2005 | 0.52x | $3.24 Million | $6.28 Million | ▲ +144.2% |
| 2004 | 0.21x | $2.16 Million | $10.21 Million | ▼ -3.7% |
| 2003 | 0.22x | $2.50 Million | $11.37 Million | ▲ +183.0% |
| 2002 | 0.08x | $823.00K | $10.60 Million | ▲ +15.5% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | $786.73K | $11.70 Million | ▲ +35.6% |
| 2000 | 0.05x | $600.00K | $12.10 Million | ▲ +105.6% |
| 1999 | -0.89x | $-10.40 Million | $11.70 Million | ▲ +55.6% |
| 1998 | -2.00x | $-10.80 Million | $5.40 Million | ▼ -51.1% |
| 1997 | -1.32x | $-4.50 Million | $3.40 Million | ▼ -410.5% |
| 1996 | -0.26x | $-700.00K | $2.70 Million | — |