Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $11.44 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($132.39 Million) in one year. Explore Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) long-term investment share to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Strattec Security Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Strattec Security Corporation across 31 annual periods. Also explore STRT total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Strattec Security Corporation (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Strattec Security Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Strattec Security Corporation market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.49x | $71.68 Million | $145.02 Million | ▲ +458.8% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | $12.27 Million | $138.67 Million | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | $10.10 Million | $129.91 Million | ▼ -26.8% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $10.44 Million | $98.27 Million | ▼ -70.7% |
| 2021 | 0.36x | $35.15 Million | $97.13 Million | ▲ +28.3% |
| 2020 | 0.28x | $25.42 Million | $90.10 Million | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2019 | 0.24x | $29.94 Million | $124.92 Million | ▲ +328.0% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $6.94 Million | $123.93 Million | ▼ -75.6% |
| 2017 | 0.23x | $23.14 Million | $101.00 Million | ▲ +144.4% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $8.22 Million | $87.66 Million | ▼ -75.3% |
| 2015 | 0.38x | $31.46 Million | $83.03 Million | ▲ +157.0% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $11.52 Million | $78.13 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 2013 | 0.27x | $15.66 Million | $57.62 Million | ▲ +24.0% |
| 2012 | 0.22x | $17.24 Million | $78.64 Million | ▲ +52.0% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $8.37 Million | $58.02 Million | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $10.06 Million | $69.21 Million | ▲ +218.3% |
| 2009 | -0.12x | $-6.84 Million | $55.63 Million | ▼ -248.4% |
| 2008 | 0.08x | $3.75 Million | $45.33 Million | ▼ -62.0% |
| 2007 | 0.22x | $9.79 Million | $44.91 Million | ▼ -56.6% |
| 2006 | 0.50x | $19.30 Million | $38.36 Million | ▲ +48.0% |
| 2005 | 0.34x | $15.75 Million | $46.34 Million | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2004 | 0.62x | $29.36 Million | $47.34 Million | ▲ +72.7% |
| 2003 | 0.36x | $17.61 Million | $49.00 Million | ▼ -38.9% |
| 2002 | 0.59x | $27.60 Million | $46.97 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2001 | 0.56x | $23.23 Million | $41.64 Million | ▼ -22.4% |
| 2000 | 0.72x | $34.90 Million | $48.53 Million | ▲ +20.0% |
| 1999 | 0.60x | $27.50 Million | $45.90 Million | ▼ -13.4% |
| 1998 | 0.69x | $26.00 Million | $37.60 Million | ▲ +348.9% |
| 1997 | 0.15x | $6.10 Million | $39.60 Million | ▼ -22.8% |
| 1996 | 0.20x | $6.90 Million | $34.60 Million | ▼ -44.0% |
| 1995 | 0.36x | $10.40 Million | $29.20 Million | — |