Siyata Mobile Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Siyata Mobile Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Siyata Mobile Inc (SYTA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.85x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-5.98 Million could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities ($3.24 Million) in one year. Check Siyata Mobile Inc (SYTA) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Siyata Mobile Inc (2001–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Siyata Mobile Inc from 2001 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Siyata Mobile Inc across 24 annual periods. Check SYTA cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Siyata Mobile Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2024)
Siyata Mobile Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Siyata Mobile Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Siyata Mobile Inc cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -1.38x | $-15.08 Million | $10.97 Million | ▲ +4.3% |
| 2023 | -1.44x | $-8.34 Million | $5.81 Million | ▲ +28.4% |
| 2022 | -2.01x | $-13.85 Million | $6.90 Million | ▼ -52.7% |
| 2021 | -1.31x | $-12.57 Million | $9.56 Million | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2020 | -1.02x | $-9.99 Million | $9.81 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 2019 | -0.86x | $-6.54 Million | $7.63 Million | ▼ -150.5% |
| 2018 | -0.34x | $-2.20 Million | $6.43 Million | ▲ +57.1% |
| 2017 | -0.80x | $-4.60 Million | $5.76 Million | ▼ -1.3% |
| 2016 | -0.79x | $-1.71 Million | $2.18 Million | ▲ +45.6% |
| 2015 | -1.45x | $-2.73 Million | $1.88 Million | ▲ +73.7% |
| 2014 | -5.50x | $-128.10K | $23.29K | ▼ -2759.2% |
| 2013 | -0.19x | $-165.29K | $859.00K | ▲ +33.6% |
| 2012 | -0.29x | $-259.40K | $894.49K | ▲ +40.3% |
| 2011 | -0.49x | $-181.59K | $373.89K | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2010 | -1.91x | $-212.36K | $111.08K | ▲ +92.8% |
| 2009 | -26.72x | $-706.07K | $26.42K | ▼ -41572.9% |
| 2008 | -0.06x | $-39.07K | $609.29K | ▲ +70.5% |
| 2007 | -0.22x | $-102.83K | $472.42K | ▲ +78.9% |
| 2006 | -1.03x | $-188.03K | $182.34K | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2005 | -1.37x | $-98.95K | $72.12K | ▲ +82.6% |
| 2004 | -7.90x | $-144.40K | $18.28K | ▼ -51.6% |
| 2003 | -5.21x | $-117.07K | $22.46K | ▼ -249.1% |
| 2002 | -1.49x | $-83.23K | $55.74K | ▲ +88.1% |
| 2001 | -12.55x | $-113.22K | $9.02K | — |