TransAct Technologies Incorporated (TACT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
TransAct Technologies Incorporated (TACT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-946.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($15.60 Million) in one year. See TACT FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
TransAct Technologies Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for TransAct Technologies Incorporated across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TransAct Technologies Incorporated operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for TransAct Technologies Incorporated (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for TransAct Technologies Incorporated. Check TACT cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.56x | $7.67 Million | $13.65 Million | ▲ +304.7% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | $1.86 Million | $13.40 Million | ▼ -62.0% |
| 2023 | 0.37x | $5.51 Million | $15.07 Million | ▲ +153.7% |
| 2022 | -0.68x | $-12.22 Million | $17.97 Million | ▼ -223.8% |
| 2021 | -0.21x | $-2.51 Million | $11.95 Million | ▲ +27.9% |
| 2020 | -0.29x | $-3.51 Million | $12.05 Million | ▼ -161.1% |
| 2019 | 0.48x | $4.85 Million | $10.16 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 2018 | 0.69x | $5.11 Million | $7.39 Million | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2017 | 0.75x | $5.92 Million | $7.94 Million | ▲ +28.0% |
| 2016 | 0.58x | $4.62 Million | $7.93 Million | ▼ -28.1% |
| 2015 | 0.81x | $5.55 Million | $6.84 Million | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2014 | 0.94x | $6.05 Million | $6.47 Million | ▲ +195.9% |
| 2013 | 0.32x | $2.49 Million | $7.89 Million | ▼ -53.3% |
| 2012 | 0.68x | $8.03 Million | $11.86 Million | ▲ +139.9% |
| 2011 | 0.28x | $2.10 Million | $7.43 Million | ▲ +65.3% |
| 2010 | 0.17x | $2.13 Million | $12.49 Million | ▼ -82.6% |
| 2009 | 0.98x | $8.37 Million | $8.54 Million | ▲ +1151.3% |
| 2008 | 0.08x | $701.00K | $8.95 Million | ▼ -72.9% |
| 2007 | 0.29x | $2.60 Million | $9.00 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2006 | 0.35x | $3.30 Million | $9.42 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2005 | 0.36x | $2.87 Million | $8.07 Million | ▼ -55.7% |
| 2004 | 0.80x | $8.34 Million | $10.38 Million | ▲ +609.3% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | $1.81 Million | $16.01 Million | ▼ -52.3% |
| 2002 | 0.24x | $3.68 Million | $15.48 Million | ▲ +203.8% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $1.45 Million | $18.48 Million | ▲ +176.2% |
| 2000 | 0.03x | $333.00K | $11.76 Million | ▼ -80.9% |
| 1999 | 0.15x | $2.00 Million | $13.50 Million | ▼ -57.0% |
| 1998 | 0.34x | $4.00 Million | $11.60 Million | ▼ -38.3% |
| 1997 | 0.56x | $3.80 Million | $6.80 Million | ▲ +78.8% |
| 1996 | 0.31x | $2.00 Million | $6.40 Million | — |