TransAct Technologies Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
TransAct Technologies Incorporated cash flow-to-debt ratio. TransAct Technologies Incorporated (TACT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-946.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($15.60 Million) in one year. Check TransAct Technologies Incorporated earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of TransAct Technologies Incorporated (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of TransAct Technologies Incorporated from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for TransAct Technologies Incorporated across 30 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of TransAct Technologies Incorporated to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
TransAct Technologies Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
TransAct Technologies Incorporated cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for TransAct Technologies Incorporated. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TACT cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.56x | $7.67 Million | $13.65 Million | ▲ +304.7% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | $1.86 Million | $13.40 Million | ▼ -62.0% |
| 2023 | 0.37x | $5.51 Million | $15.07 Million | ▲ +153.7% |
| 2022 | -0.68x | $-12.22 Million | $17.97 Million | ▼ -223.8% |
| 2021 | -0.21x | $-2.51 Million | $11.95 Million | ▲ +27.9% |
| 2020 | -0.29x | $-3.51 Million | $12.05 Million | ▼ -161.1% |
| 2019 | 0.48x | $4.85 Million | $10.16 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 2018 | 0.69x | $5.11 Million | $7.39 Million | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2017 | 0.75x | $5.92 Million | $7.94 Million | ▲ +28.0% |
| 2016 | 0.58x | $4.62 Million | $7.93 Million | ▼ -28.1% |
| 2015 | 0.81x | $5.55 Million | $6.84 Million | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2014 | 0.94x | $6.05 Million | $6.47 Million | ▲ +195.9% |
| 2013 | 0.32x | $2.49 Million | $7.89 Million | ▼ -53.3% |
| 2012 | 0.68x | $8.03 Million | $11.86 Million | ▲ +139.9% |
| 2011 | 0.28x | $2.10 Million | $7.43 Million | ▲ +65.3% |
| 2010 | 0.17x | $2.13 Million | $12.49 Million | ▼ -82.6% |
| 2009 | 0.98x | $8.37 Million | $8.54 Million | ▲ +1151.3% |
| 2008 | 0.08x | $701.00K | $8.95 Million | ▼ -72.9% |
| 2007 | 0.29x | $2.60 Million | $9.00 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2006 | 0.35x | $3.30 Million | $9.42 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2005 | 0.36x | $2.87 Million | $8.07 Million | ▼ -55.7% |
| 2004 | 0.80x | $8.34 Million | $10.38 Million | ▲ +609.3% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | $1.81 Million | $16.01 Million | ▼ -52.3% |
| 2002 | 0.24x | $3.68 Million | $15.48 Million | ▲ +203.8% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $1.45 Million | $18.48 Million | ▲ +176.2% |
| 2000 | 0.03x | $333.00K | $11.76 Million | ▼ -80.9% |
| 1999 | 0.15x | $2.00 Million | $13.50 Million | ▼ -57.0% |
| 1998 | 0.34x | $4.00 Million | $11.60 Million | ▼ -38.3% |
| 1997 | 0.56x | $3.80 Million | $6.80 Million | ▲ +78.8% |
| 1996 | 0.31x | $2.00 Million | $6.40 Million | — |