TransAct Technologies Incorporated (TACT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
TransAct Technologies Incorporated (TACT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $609.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($13.65 Million) in one year. See TACT FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
TransAct Technologies Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for TransAct Technologies Incorporated across 30 annual periods. Also explore TACT net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for TransAct Technologies Incorporated (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for TransAct Technologies Incorporated. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of TransAct Technologies Incorporated.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.56x | $7.67 Million | $13.65 Million | ▲ +304.7% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | $1.86 Million | $13.40 Million | ▼ -62.0% |
| 2023 | 0.37x | $5.51 Million | $15.07 Million | ▲ +153.7% |
| 2022 | -0.68x | $-12.22 Million | $17.97 Million | ▼ -223.8% |
| 2021 | -0.21x | $-2.51 Million | $11.95 Million | ▲ +27.9% |
| 2020 | -0.29x | $-3.51 Million | $12.05 Million | ▼ -161.1% |
| 2019 | 0.48x | $4.85 Million | $10.16 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 2018 | 0.69x | $5.11 Million | $7.39 Million | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2017 | 0.75x | $5.92 Million | $7.94 Million | ▲ +28.0% |
| 2016 | 0.58x | $4.62 Million | $7.93 Million | ▼ -28.1% |
| 2015 | 0.81x | $5.55 Million | $6.84 Million | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2014 | 0.94x | $6.05 Million | $6.47 Million | ▲ +195.9% |
| 2013 | 0.32x | $2.49 Million | $7.89 Million | ▼ -53.3% |
| 2012 | 0.68x | $8.03 Million | $11.86 Million | ▲ +139.9% |
| 2011 | 0.28x | $2.10 Million | $7.43 Million | ▲ +65.3% |
| 2010 | 0.17x | $2.13 Million | $12.49 Million | ▼ -82.6% |
| 2009 | 0.98x | $8.37 Million | $8.54 Million | ▲ +1151.3% |
| 2008 | 0.08x | $701.00K | $8.95 Million | ▼ -72.9% |
| 2007 | 0.29x | $2.60 Million | $9.00 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2006 | 0.35x | $3.30 Million | $9.42 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2005 | 0.36x | $2.87 Million | $8.07 Million | ▼ -55.7% |
| 2004 | 0.80x | $8.34 Million | $10.38 Million | ▲ +609.3% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | $1.81 Million | $16.01 Million | ▼ -52.3% |
| 2002 | 0.24x | $3.68 Million | $15.48 Million | ▲ +203.8% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $1.45 Million | $18.48 Million | ▲ +176.2% |
| 2000 | 0.03x | $333.00K | $11.76 Million | ▼ -80.9% |
| 1999 | 0.15x | $2.00 Million | $13.50 Million | ▼ -57.0% |
| 1998 | 0.34x | $4.00 Million | $11.60 Million | ▼ -38.3% |
| 1997 | 0.56x | $3.80 Million | $6.80 Million | ▲ +78.8% |
| 1996 | 0.31x | $2.00 Million | $6.40 Million | — |