Tat Techno Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tat Techno cash flow-to-debt ratio. Tat Techno (TATT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.95 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($52.33 Million) in one year. Check Tat Techno total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Tat Techno (1988–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Tat Techno from 1988 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Tat Techno across 38 annual periods. Check TATT cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Tat Techno Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1988–2025)
Tat Techno cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1988 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tat Techno. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TATT cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.30x | $14.97 Million | $50.34 Million | ▲ +362.8% |
| 2024 | -0.11x | $-5.82 Million | $51.39 Million | ▼ -375.6% |
| 2023 | 0.04x | $2.25 Million | $54.89 Million | ▲ +143.1% |
| 2022 | -0.10x | $-4.87 Million | $51.08 Million | ▼ -117.4% |
| 2021 | -0.04x | $-1.49 Million | $34.05 Million | ▼ -119.8% |
| 2020 | 0.22x | $7.95 Million | $35.84 Million | ▲ +89.8% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | $3.42 Million | $29.30 Million | ▲ +6.6% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $2.08 Million | $18.99 Million | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $2.50 Million | $23.42 Million | ▼ -55.0% |
| 2016 | 0.24x | $5.52 Million | $23.32 Million | ▲ +486.4% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | $733.00K | $18.16 Million | ▲ +144.3% |
| 2014 | -0.09x | $-1.46 Million | $16.00 Million | ▼ -124.7% |
| 2013 | 0.37x | $7.89 Million | $21.35 Million | ▲ +7.3% |
| 2012 | 0.34x | $7.74 Million | $22.48 Million | ▲ +1193.9% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $696.00K | $26.16 Million | ▼ -73.5% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $3.04 Million | $30.21 Million | ▲ +3511.6% |
| 2009 | 0.00x | $-79.00K | $26.80 Million | ▼ -105.4% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $1.69 Million | $31.15 Million | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2007 | 0.05x | $804.00K | $16.13 Million | ▼ -74.4% |
| 2006 | 0.19x | $5.15 Million | $26.52 Million | ▲ +19.2% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | $4.14 Million | $25.39 Million | ▼ -25.3% |
| 2004 | 0.22x | $1.91 Million | $8.74 Million | ▼ -37.0% |
| 2003 | 0.35x | $3.65 Million | $10.52 Million | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2002 | 0.52x | $4.82 Million | $9.33 Million | ▲ +65.9% |
| 2001 | 0.31x | $2.05 Million | $6.58 Million | ▼ -31.3% |
| 2000 | 0.45x | $4.82 Million | $10.63 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 1999 | 0.44x | $2.26 Million | $5.08 Million | ▲ +411.2% |
| 1998 | -0.14x | $-600.00K | $4.20 Million | ▼ -142.9% |
| 1997 | 0.33x | $1.40 Million | $4.20 Million | ▲ +413.3% |
| 1996 | -0.11x | $-500.00K | $4.70 Million | ▼ -293.6% |
| 1995 | -0.03x | $-200.00K | $7.40 Million | ▼ -107.7% |
| 1994 | 0.35x | $2.60 Million | $7.40 Million | ▲ +140.8% |
| 1993 | -0.86x | $-5.00 Million | $5.80 Million | ▼ -4927.6% |
| 1992 | 0.02x | $100.00K | $5.60 Million | ▼ -94.2% |
| 1991 | 0.31x | $800.00K | $2.60 Million | ▲ +115.4% |
| 1990 | -2.00x | $-600.00K | $300.00K | ▼ -27.7% |
| 1989 | -1.57x | $-940.00K | $600.00K | ▼ -687.5% |
| 1988 | 0.27x | $160.00K | $600.00K | — |