Tat Techno (TATT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tat Techno (TATT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $7.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($53.45 Million) in one year. See Tat Techno (TATT) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tat Techno Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1988–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tat Techno across 37 annual periods. Also explore Tat Techno (TATT) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tat Techno (1988–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tat Techno. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TATT market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.11x | $-5.82 Million | $51.39 Million | ▼ -375.6% |
| 2023 | 0.04x | $2.25 Million | $54.89 Million | ▲ +143.1% |
| 2022 | -0.10x | $-4.87 Million | $51.08 Million | ▼ -117.4% |
| 2021 | -0.04x | $-1.49 Million | $34.05 Million | ▼ -119.8% |
| 2020 | 0.22x | $7.95 Million | $35.84 Million | ▲ +89.8% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | $3.42 Million | $29.30 Million | ▲ +6.6% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $2.08 Million | $18.99 Million | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $2.50 Million | $23.42 Million | ▼ -55.0% |
| 2016 | 0.24x | $5.52 Million | $23.32 Million | ▲ +486.4% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | $733.00K | $18.16 Million | ▲ +144.3% |
| 2014 | -0.09x | $-1.46 Million | $16.00 Million | ▼ -124.7% |
| 2013 | 0.37x | $7.89 Million | $21.35 Million | ▲ +7.3% |
| 2012 | 0.34x | $7.74 Million | $22.48 Million | ▲ +1193.9% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $696.00K | $26.16 Million | ▼ -73.5% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $3.04 Million | $30.21 Million | ▲ +3511.6% |
| 2009 | 0.00x | $-79.00K | $26.80 Million | ▼ -105.4% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $1.69 Million | $31.15 Million | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2007 | 0.05x | $804.00K | $16.13 Million | ▼ -74.4% |
| 2006 | 0.19x | $5.15 Million | $26.52 Million | ▲ +19.2% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | $4.14 Million | $25.39 Million | ▼ -25.3% |
| 2004 | 0.22x | $1.91 Million | $8.74 Million | ▼ -37.0% |
| 2003 | 0.35x | $3.65 Million | $10.52 Million | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2002 | 0.52x | $4.82 Million | $9.33 Million | ▲ +65.9% |
| 2001 | 0.31x | $2.05 Million | $6.58 Million | ▼ -31.3% |
| 2000 | 0.45x | $4.82 Million | $10.63 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 1999 | 0.44x | $2.26 Million | $5.08 Million | ▲ +411.2% |
| 1998 | -0.14x | $-600.00K | $4.20 Million | ▼ -142.9% |
| 1997 | 0.33x | $1.40 Million | $4.20 Million | ▲ +413.3% |
| 1996 | -0.11x | $-500.00K | $4.70 Million | ▼ -293.6% |
| 1995 | -0.03x | $-200.00K | $7.40 Million | ▼ -107.7% |
| 1994 | 0.35x | $2.60 Million | $7.40 Million | ▲ +140.8% |
| 1993 | -0.86x | $-5.00 Million | $5.80 Million | ▼ -4927.6% |
| 1992 | 0.02x | $100.00K | $5.60 Million | ▼ -94.2% |
| 1991 | 0.31x | $800.00K | $2.60 Million | ▲ +115.4% |
| 1990 | -2.00x | $-600.00K | $300.00K | ▼ -27.7% |
| 1989 | -1.57x | $-940.00K | $600.00K | ▼ -687.5% |
| 1988 | 0.27x | $160.00K | $600.00K | — |