Gentherm Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Gentherm Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Gentherm Inc (THRM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $7.32 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($770.09 Million) in one year. Check Gentherm Inc investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Gentherm Inc (1993–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Gentherm Inc from 1993 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Gentherm Inc across 33 annual periods. Check Gentherm Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Gentherm Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2025)
Gentherm Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Gentherm Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Gentherm Inc cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.17x | $116.79 Million | $676.11 Million | ▼ -0.7% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | $109.65 Million | $630.61 Million | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2023 | 0.20x | $119.27 Million | $589.65 Million | ▲ +667.3% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $14.95 Million | $567.03 Million | ▼ -94.8% |
| 2021 | 0.51x | $143.08 Million | $281.54 Million | ▲ +100.4% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | $110.69 Million | $436.51 Million | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2019 | 0.47x | $118.80 Million | $254.74 Million | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2018 | 0.37x | $118.43 Million | $323.35 Million | ▲ +142.0% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | $49.88 Million | $329.53 Million | ▼ -46.6% |
| 2016 | 0.28x | $108.40 Million | $382.62 Million | ▼ -29.0% |
| 2015 | 0.40x | $104.71 Million | $262.51 Million | ▲ +30.9% |
| 2014 | 0.30x | $80.33 Million | $263.67 Million | ▲ +23.1% |
| 2013 | 0.25x | $61.85 Million | $249.83 Million | ▲ +49.1% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $37.21 Million | $224.03 Million | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $35.37 Million | $270.09 Million | ▼ -76.9% |
| 2010 | 0.57x | $12.39 Million | $21.89 Million | ▲ +94.2% |
| 2009 | 0.29x | $4.25 Million | $14.59 Million | ▼ -60.2% |
| 2008 | 0.73x | $5.54 Million | $7.56 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2007 | 1.07x | $14.24 Million | $13.28 Million | ▲ +105.2% |
| 2006 | 0.52x | $4.82 Million | $9.22 Million | ▲ +78.3% |
| 2005 | 0.29x | $2.52 Million | $8.60 Million | ▼ -41.5% |
| 2004 | 0.50x | $3.03 Million | $6.05 Million | ▲ +276.5% |
| 2003 | -0.28x | $-1.87 Million | $6.58 Million | ▲ +69.3% |
| 2002 | -0.92x | $-6.94 Million | $7.51 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2001 | -1.07x | $-6.68 Million | $6.25 Million | ▲ +65.9% |
| 2000 | -3.13x | $-9.37 Million | $3.00 Million | ▼ -295.1% |
| 1999 | -0.79x | $-7.49 Million | $9.47 Million | ▲ +89.9% |
| 1998 | -7.87x | $-7.23 Million | $918.00K | ▼ -38.5% |
| 1997 | -5.69x | $-6.47 Million | $1.14 Million | ▼ -341.5% |
| 1996 | -1.29x | $-8.50 Million | $6.60 Million | ▲ +62.0% |
| 1995 | -3.39x | $-6.10 Million | $1.80 Million | ▼ -201.2% |
| 1994 | -1.13x | $-2.70 Million | $2.40 Million | ▲ +72.8% |
| 1993 | -4.14x | $-2.90 Million | $700.00K | — |