Gentherm Inc (THRM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Gentherm Inc (THRM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-5.04 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($713.82 Million) in one year. Explore THRM strategic capital deployment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Gentherm Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Gentherm Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore Gentherm Inc balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Gentherm Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Gentherm Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see THRM stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.17x | $116.79 Million | $676.11 Million | ▼ -0.7% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | $109.65 Million | $630.61 Million | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2023 | 0.20x | $119.27 Million | $589.65 Million | ▲ +667.3% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $14.95 Million | $567.03 Million | ▼ -94.8% |
| 2021 | 0.51x | $143.08 Million | $281.54 Million | ▲ +100.4% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | $110.69 Million | $436.51 Million | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2019 | 0.47x | $118.80 Million | $254.74 Million | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2018 | 0.37x | $118.43 Million | $323.35 Million | ▲ +142.0% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | $49.88 Million | $329.53 Million | ▼ -46.6% |
| 2016 | 0.28x | $108.40 Million | $382.62 Million | ▼ -29.0% |
| 2015 | 0.40x | $104.71 Million | $262.51 Million | ▲ +30.9% |
| 2014 | 0.30x | $80.33 Million | $263.67 Million | ▲ +23.1% |
| 2013 | 0.25x | $61.85 Million | $249.83 Million | ▲ +49.1% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $37.21 Million | $224.03 Million | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $35.37 Million | $270.09 Million | ▼ -76.9% |
| 2010 | 0.57x | $12.39 Million | $21.89 Million | ▲ +94.2% |
| 2009 | 0.29x | $4.25 Million | $14.59 Million | ▼ -60.2% |
| 2008 | 0.73x | $5.54 Million | $7.56 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2007 | 1.07x | $14.24 Million | $13.28 Million | ▲ +105.2% |
| 2006 | 0.52x | $4.82 Million | $9.22 Million | ▲ +78.3% |
| 2005 | 0.29x | $2.52 Million | $8.60 Million | ▼ -41.5% |
| 2004 | 0.50x | $3.03 Million | $6.05 Million | ▲ +276.5% |
| 2003 | -0.28x | $-1.87 Million | $6.58 Million | ▲ +69.3% |
| 2002 | -0.92x | $-6.94 Million | $7.51 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2001 | -1.07x | $-6.68 Million | $6.25 Million | ▲ +65.9% |
| 2000 | -3.13x | $-9.37 Million | $3.00 Million | ▼ -295.1% |
| 1999 | -0.79x | $-7.49 Million | $9.47 Million | ▲ +89.9% |
| 1998 | -7.87x | $-7.23 Million | $918.00K | ▼ -38.5% |
| 1997 | -5.69x | $-6.47 Million | $1.14 Million | ▼ -341.5% |
| 1996 | -1.29x | $-8.50 Million | $6.60 Million | ▲ +62.0% |
| 1995 | -3.39x | $-6.10 Million | $1.80 Million | ▼ -201.2% |
| 1994 | -1.13x | $-2.70 Million | $2.40 Million | ▲ +72.8% |
| 1993 | -4.14x | $-2.90 Million | $700.00K | — |