Gentherm Inc (THRM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Gentherm Inc (THRM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-5.04 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($713.82 Million) in one year. See THRM free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Gentherm Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Gentherm Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore Gentherm Inc net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Gentherm Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Gentherm Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Gentherm Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.17x | $116.79 Million | $676.11 Million | ▼ -0.7% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | $109.65 Million | $630.61 Million | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2023 | 0.20x | $119.27 Million | $589.65 Million | ▲ +667.3% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $14.95 Million | $567.03 Million | ▼ -94.8% |
| 2021 | 0.51x | $143.08 Million | $281.54 Million | ▲ +100.4% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | $110.69 Million | $436.51 Million | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2019 | 0.47x | $118.80 Million | $254.74 Million | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2018 | 0.37x | $118.43 Million | $323.35 Million | ▲ +142.0% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | $49.88 Million | $329.53 Million | ▼ -46.6% |
| 2016 | 0.28x | $108.40 Million | $382.62 Million | ▼ -29.0% |
| 2015 | 0.40x | $104.71 Million | $262.51 Million | ▲ +30.9% |
| 2014 | 0.30x | $80.33 Million | $263.67 Million | ▲ +23.1% |
| 2013 | 0.25x | $61.85 Million | $249.83 Million | ▲ +49.1% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $37.21 Million | $224.03 Million | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $35.37 Million | $270.09 Million | ▼ -76.9% |
| 2010 | 0.57x | $12.39 Million | $21.89 Million | ▲ +94.2% |
| 2009 | 0.29x | $4.25 Million | $14.59 Million | ▼ -60.2% |
| 2008 | 0.73x | $5.54 Million | $7.56 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2007 | 1.07x | $14.24 Million | $13.28 Million | ▲ +105.2% |
| 2006 | 0.52x | $4.82 Million | $9.22 Million | ▲ +78.3% |
| 2005 | 0.29x | $2.52 Million | $8.60 Million | ▼ -41.5% |
| 2004 | 0.50x | $3.03 Million | $6.05 Million | ▲ +276.5% |
| 2003 | -0.28x | $-1.87 Million | $6.58 Million | ▲ +69.3% |
| 2002 | -0.92x | $-6.94 Million | $7.51 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2001 | -1.07x | $-6.68 Million | $6.25 Million | ▲ +65.9% |
| 2000 | -3.13x | $-9.37 Million | $3.00 Million | ▼ -295.1% |
| 1999 | -0.79x | $-7.49 Million | $9.47 Million | ▲ +89.9% |
| 1998 | -7.87x | $-7.23 Million | $918.00K | ▼ -38.5% |
| 1997 | -5.69x | $-6.47 Million | $1.14 Million | ▼ -341.5% |
| 1996 | -1.29x | $-8.50 Million | $6.60 Million | ▲ +62.0% |
| 1995 | -3.39x | $-6.10 Million | $1.80 Million | ▼ -201.2% |
| 1994 | -1.13x | $-2.70 Million | $2.40 Million | ▲ +72.8% |
| 1993 | -4.14x | $-2.90 Million | $700.00K | — |