Trustmark Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Trustmark Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $56.77 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($17.05 Billion) in one year. Check TRMK cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Trustmark Corporation (1990–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Trustmark Corporation from 1990 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Trustmark Corporation across 36 annual periods. Check TRMK cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Trustmark Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2025)
Trustmark Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Trustmark Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Trustmark Corporation cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | $243.90 Million | $16.80 Billion | ▲ +101.0% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $116.93 Million | $16.19 Billion | ▼ -37.4% |
| 2023 | 0.01x | $196.89 Million | $17.06 Billion | ▼ -35.7% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $296.52 Million | $16.52 Billion | ▼ -18.4% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $348.77 Million | $15.85 Billion | ▲ +398.6% |
| 2020 | 0.00x | $65.35 Million | $14.81 Billion | ▼ -55.1% |
| 2019 | 0.01x | $116.45 Million | $11.84 Billion | ▼ -51.9% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $239.20 Million | $11.70 Billion | ▲ +21.0% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $206.61 Million | $12.23 Billion | ▲ +34.8% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $148.34 Million | $11.83 Billion | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | $171.89 Million | $11.21 Billion | ▼ -21.4% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | $211.27 Million | $10.83 Billion | ▼ -32.4% |
| 2013 | 0.03x | $301.18 Million | $10.44 Billion | ▲ +119.6% |
| 2012 | 0.01x | $112.28 Million | $8.54 Billion | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $173.59 Million | $8.51 Billion | ▼ -17.1% |
| 2010 | 0.02x | $206.78 Million | $8.40 Billion | ▲ +20.2% |
| 2009 | 0.02x | $172.32 Million | $8.42 Billion | ▲ +56.7% |
| 2008 | 0.01x | $112.52 Million | $8.61 Billion | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | $83.93 Million | $8.05 Billion | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | $151.19 Million | $7.95 Billion | ▲ +71.2% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $84.71 Million | $7.62 Billion | ▼ -49.7% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $161.18 Million | $7.30 Billion | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2003 | 0.03x | $199.78 Million | $7.22 Billion | ▲ +160.2% |
| 2002 | 0.01x | $68.65 Million | $6.46 Billion | ▼ -71.6% |
| 2001 | 0.04x | $242.86 Million | $6.49 Billion | ▲ +295.0% |
| 2000 | -0.02x | $-119.99 Million | $6.26 Billion | ▼ -204.0% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $112.20 Million | $6.09 Billion | ▲ +26.6% |
| 1998 | 0.01x | $83.00 Million | $5.70 Billion | ▼ -7.1% |
| 1997 | 0.02x | $77.60 Million | $4.95 Billion | ▼ -12.8% |
| 1996 | 0.02x | $83.90 Million | $4.67 Billion | ▲ +30.4% |
| 1995 | 0.01x | $62.20 Million | $4.51 Billion | ▲ +20.2% |
| 1994 | 0.01x | $49.80 Million | $4.34 Billion | ▼ -20.1% |
| 1993 | 0.01x | $58.50 Million | $4.07 Billion | ▲ +88.3% |
| 1992 | 0.01x | $28.90 Million | $3.79 Billion | ▼ -63.2% |
| 1991 | 0.02x | $74.90 Million | $3.61 Billion | ▲ +166.0% |
| 1990 | 0.01x | $26.90 Million | $3.45 Billion | — |