Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $27.10 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($16.86 Billion) in one year. See TRMK free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Trustmark Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Trustmark Corporation across 36 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Trustmark Corporation to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Trustmark Corporation (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Trustmark Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | $243.90 Million | $16.80 Billion | ▲ +101.0% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $116.93 Million | $16.19 Billion | ▼ -37.4% |
| 2023 | 0.01x | $196.89 Million | $17.06 Billion | ▼ -35.7% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $296.52 Million | $16.52 Billion | ▼ -18.4% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $348.77 Million | $15.85 Billion | ▲ +398.6% |
| 2020 | 0.00x | $65.35 Million | $14.81 Billion | ▼ -55.1% |
| 2019 | 0.01x | $116.45 Million | $11.84 Billion | ▼ -51.9% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $239.20 Million | $11.70 Billion | ▲ +21.0% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $206.61 Million | $12.23 Billion | ▲ +34.8% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $148.34 Million | $11.83 Billion | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | $171.89 Million | $11.21 Billion | ▼ -21.4% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | $211.27 Million | $10.83 Billion | ▼ -32.4% |
| 2013 | 0.03x | $301.18 Million | $10.44 Billion | ▲ +119.6% |
| 2012 | 0.01x | $112.28 Million | $8.54 Billion | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $173.59 Million | $8.51 Billion | ▼ -17.1% |
| 2010 | 0.02x | $206.78 Million | $8.40 Billion | ▲ +20.2% |
| 2009 | 0.02x | $172.32 Million | $8.42 Billion | ▲ +56.7% |
| 2008 | 0.01x | $112.52 Million | $8.61 Billion | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | $83.93 Million | $8.05 Billion | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | $151.19 Million | $7.95 Billion | ▲ +71.2% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $84.71 Million | $7.62 Billion | ▼ -49.7% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $161.18 Million | $7.30 Billion | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2003 | 0.03x | $199.78 Million | $7.22 Billion | ▲ +160.2% |
| 2002 | 0.01x | $68.65 Million | $6.46 Billion | ▼ -71.6% |
| 2001 | 0.04x | $242.86 Million | $6.49 Billion | ▲ +295.0% |
| 2000 | -0.02x | $-119.99 Million | $6.26 Billion | ▼ -204.0% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $112.20 Million | $6.09 Billion | ▲ +26.6% |
| 1998 | 0.01x | $83.00 Million | $5.70 Billion | ▼ -7.1% |
| 1997 | 0.02x | $77.60 Million | $4.95 Billion | ▼ -12.8% |
| 1996 | 0.02x | $83.90 Million | $4.67 Billion | ▲ +30.4% |
| 1995 | 0.01x | $62.20 Million | $4.51 Billion | ▲ +20.2% |
| 1994 | 0.01x | $49.80 Million | $4.34 Billion | ▼ -20.1% |
| 1993 | 0.01x | $58.50 Million | $4.07 Billion | ▲ +88.3% |
| 1992 | 0.01x | $28.90 Million | $3.79 Billion | ▼ -63.2% |
| 1991 | 0.02x | $74.90 Million | $3.61 Billion | ▲ +166.0% |
| 1990 | 0.01x | $26.90 Million | $3.45 Billion | — |